Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dickenscider If the PHB (for example) was published under the OGL, then that content will remain governed by the OGL. |
It wasn't released under the
OGL.
Quote:
I still think that discerning the application of one license over the other (fantasy vs non-fantasy) is going to be a potentially big problem. This of course depends entirely on the wording of each. I'm really beginning to pick up on a pattern with WOTC releasing statements that confuse more than illuminate. I'm also getting a little fed up with it. But...whatever...
|
I'm fairly sure they won't actually care about the fantasy/modern fluff/flavour - it'll simply be to do with the compatibility statement/access to branding. You'd choose whichever you felt best for you product. But without seeing the licencse, that's just an educated guess. I very much doubt the word "fantasy" will appear in either license.