View Single Post
Old 30th April 2008, 08:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
InzeladunMaster
Registered User
 
InzeladunMaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 899
InzeladunMaster Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thormagni
So, recognizing that some of my gaming buddies have backed away from rpgs, I'm interested in the group's overall feelings about the 4th edition of D&D.
Temporarily, mind you. I am very ambivalent toward 4E.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thormagni
Personally, I am fairly ambivalent. On the one hand, I am intrigued by some of the changes, like making it possible for 1st level characters to have an exciting fight, and for spell casters to continue to be useful after an hour of adventuring. The idea of giving every player something interesting to do throughout the night's game is certainly encouraging.
All of these were promises made for 3E, too. I feel like players have this already if they want it. Some players just like to sit around and do little. I am not sure solving everything through mechanics is the best plan. But still, promises promises. I have heard this before.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thormagni
And hard-coding the idea of role-playing by setting up systems for social, ah, combat also sounds pretty interesting (and is certainly something I have railed about before, at length.)
This could be interesting - or cumbersome.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thormagni
On the other hand, I am less than enthralled with the complete switch to a "map and figures" game. And what I have heard about the fairly rigidly set "roles" is discouraging (What would be the purpose of a role-playing heavy but combat light character in a game which seems to define everyone by their combat specialty?)
I have to admit I am very turned off by the "role" concept. It seems too "computer RPG" for me. It also forces "well-balanced" groups, instead of interesting groups that might have to overcome their weaknesses.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thormagni
And a big negative for me is the sheer amount of 3.5 material I have accumulated. I guess on a book-by-book basis I probably had as many 2nd edition books, but those were flimsy, black-and-white softbound books. Not the well-illustrated, full-color hardbacks that are my 3.5 collection. That is a lot of money and shelfspace invested just to see them go obsolete.
I am in in complete agreement here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thormagni
I guess the big deciding factor for me is the group. If anyone is interested in playing 4th edition, I will play it. But if no one shows any interest, I'm not sure I will even pick it up (yeah, I know. I don't believe myself when I say this either.)
I am not all that interested. I really like the Savage Worlds system I am working on right now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thormagni
Does anyone want to try the new edition or have thoughts one way or another?
I will try anything, of course, but the money and shelf-space issue... Ugh. I certainly don't want to buy anything I won't like or use, so I really will have to try it before I buy it.
__________________
A Sample of My Art
My Pen & Paper Credits
Short Stories
My Interview with Sword & Sorcery.org

"Why, you speak treason!" --Olivia de Havilland.
"Fluently." --Errol Flynn.
InzeladunMaster is offline   Reply With Quote