Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xsjado That paragraph reads like a definition of hyperbole. |
We must be using conflicting definitions of the word.
AFAIK, it means an exaggeration. I'm not exaggerating here. My experiences are not unique; I've seen many of the same complaints. Anecdotal? Yes. Hyperbole? No.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xsjado I'm going to re-iterate that it was a clear case of price gouging so you don't jump down my throat again. |
I wasn't aware of jumping down your throat a first time. If I came of as such, I apologize it wasn't my intention. I'm vehement about the subject but I'm not trying to be rude.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xsjado Regardless of the print quality it is still going to be better than what you would get by printing at home which was the original comparison. |
Strongly disagree. We're using a self-printed copy of the PrRC at our game now and it looks and feels great.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xsjado Changing the goal posts just turns your point into a straw man. |
It's not a straw man, I'm not intentionally steering the argument to a subject I feel I can win. To add additional weight to my argument, I stated that if the print quality of
KotS was any indication of the level of quality we can expect from future products, digital media may be a better solution. I would pay more money for a better quality book. If the quality of the books are lacking, I would print it myself if I could buy a PDF from
WotC.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xsjado As we've seen from the leaked copies, they are full colour and that requires a higher quality print process and paper than we saw in the preview module. |
Perhaps I don't understand what you mean by "full color,” I have
KotS, it appears to be full color. The ink smudges horribly and the paper is too thin.
And yet another word from our sponsors
