EN World D&D / RPG News - View Single Post

Corjay · 30th July 2008, 06:36 PM

You know, the person who brought up the point about Dancey's theory was you. I didn't bring it up, and I never challenged it, and I never said it was your theory. What I challenged was your statement that the OGL was successful. I say again "Just because the networking concept was the basis is not proof that it worked. The concept can still be solid, while its execution is extremely flawed." To translate, just because the networking worked out doesn't mean the OGL was successful. The OGL can successfully accomplish networking without successfully accomplishing bolstering WOTC's bottom line. Conversely, WOTC's bottom line can be bolstered through securing their property as done in the GSL while still accomplishing Dancey's networking theory. Though, admittedly, as I pointed out a couple of times above, subsection 6.1 causes a kink in profits, a kink caused by putting a little damper on the networking aspect, and thus needs a rewrite in that portion.

Clear enough?

30th July 2008, 06:36 PM	#17 (permalink)
Corjay Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Ask Posts: 349	You know, the person who brought up the point about Dancey's theory was you. I didn't bring it up, and I never challenged it, and I never said it was your theory. What I challenged was your statement that the OGL was successful. I say again "Just because the networking concept was the basis is not proof that it worked. The concept can still be solid, while its execution is extremely flawed." To translate, just because the networking worked out doesn't mean the OGL was successful. The OGL can successfully accomplish networking without successfully accomplishing bolstering WOTC's bottom line. Conversely, WOTC's bottom line can be bolstered through securing their property as done in the GSL while still accomplishing Dancey's networking theory. Though, admittedly, as I pointed out a couple of times above, subsection 6.1 causes a kink in profits, a kink caused by putting a little damper on the networking aspect, and thus needs a rewrite in that portion. Clear enough? Last edited by Corjay; 30th July 2008 at 06:45 PM..