Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrin Drader  I find this comment interesting. How exactly is it poor reasoning and logic that would lead me to the possibilities I posted? They are perfectly logical conclusions, and I suspect they carry with them more than just a bit of truth. |
They are logical conclusions if you ignore the sales of
4e.
4e is doing well. Exceedingly well, according to Mr. Bill Slavicsek. Considering the fast sell-out of the biggest first print ever, and that they are all-ready in their 3rd print, it might just be true. Considering the fact that the core books were ranked higher than ever on several best-seller lists, which are based on actual buys by customers, it might just be true.
Of course, due to your intense dislike of
4e, you actually rather believe that they failed and that it is all a cover up.
Which is more likely. That the employees and bosses of a public company lie about figures, about the size of their print runs, and somehow manage to trick several reputable bestseller lists into "giving" their books a good spot high up on the list, or that you are wrong, and that
4e, despite that you don't like it, does quite well.
Cheers
__________________
355 hours played
Gnoguh, human fighter/cleric (kensei->adamantine soldier)
Carric, elf cleric/ranger (radiant servant->saint)
Torn, tiefling wizard/cleric (divine oracle->sages of ages)
Truxas, human feylock/bard (feytouched->feyliege)
Tagron, human rogue (daggermaster->deadly trickster)
21th level Musings of an Epic Virgin 
And yet another word from our sponsors
