| The conversation is over. Everyone's stepping back.
You come in here, having participated zilch in this discussion, acting all high and mighty, arrogantly demanding an apology, respect, and "a more friendly tone" for someone else. I tell you what, when you can prove yourself morally superior enough not to pick other people's fights, nay, not to pick any fights at all, I'll step back a moment. I think that's a fair trade. — The rest of everyone else on this site who have viewed the exchange have proven themselves morally superior enough not to get into it.
Until you came in here sporting a crankfest, this discussion was back on track. The only apology any of us here need is yours for fanning the flames after it was all over, but I don't care if you do or don't. Just stop your moaning about me and let this discussion return to its previous state.
EDIT: removed "half" rant.
__________________
My current view of the OGL: Though accomplishing exactly what it was meant to do, it is flawed for not providing WOTC more latitude.
My current view of the GSL: section 2 and subsections 6.1, 11.1, and 11.3 need to be completely rewritten to protect the licensee from abuse, but the rest of the GSL is commendable and provides loss leader dynamics superior to the OGL, as the point to being a loss leader is pointing the community toward the loss leader.
Last edited by Corjay; 17th September 2008 at 10:00 PM..
| 
And yet another word from our sponsors
