Forum

[roguerouge]

Originally Posted by Meghan

Dude, you quoted me from a different site-- a site which is for the podcast you don't want to listen to. You are taking my comments which refer to that episode.

I'm fine with you not wanting to listen- podcasts aren't for everyone and mine isn't for every podcast listener.

But you can't take what I say about an episode and bring it here and say I'm not supporting my evidence.

I followed your link from here.

I guess I'll never know why you feel Changeling the Lost is bad, why Animalcast is amateur, or why Epic Role Playing is in a worse class from the rest. You only tell me that they are.

Because all you will write is:

Originally Posted by roguerouge

* You write: "the one who won, Changeling the Lost, had some of the writing I've ever seen in a book." Okay. Why? Can you give me some examples? Can you compare and contrast with other selections? Do you have any evidence other than that you say so? Let's see what your link says: "Changeling: The Lost: Idiot, Full of , and . Rating: 0" I see. So, still no examples.

* You write: "Animalcast has a lot wrong with it and just isn't nearly the quality of many other podcasts- audio or content. A true critical, objective analysis would not have placed it in the top of all submissions." Again, can you give examples? Will you provide evidence to back up your assertions? Is that really too much to ask?

* You write: "And then another book which we were just confounded by as a nomination- Epic Role Playing- wasn't in the same class as the other nominees. It seemed like a good start, but very amateurish." How so? Examples? Any piece of evidence beyond your unsupported opinion?

So, yes, there's still no evidence, just unsupported opinions for the real impact of your argument: that someone else should have been nominated. And since I've given you several opportunities to make your case on these issues—and you still haven't—I'll quote a VIP ENWorlder: "We're done here."