Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Banks  I believe (but I'm not going to assert as true) that the BG folks have established what they consider to be an objective, scientific approach to analysis of games in order to determine what makes them good or bad games. I do not believe that Meghan, Josh, or Zeke feel that their game analysis is opinion for this reason, and that judges should likewise establish this objective set of critera going forward.
Cheers,
Cam |
I can believe that. What they should be doing with their set of criteria, is try to patent it, or package it in a way so that they can use it for other fields of publishing, for they would make billions.
If it is true that they have found a way to do away with opinions when it comes to judging a game, and have a pure and scientific method, there's some sort of Nobel prize waiting in their future, for they have done what all of humanity up until now have failed to achieve!
I'm very interested in seeing their method!
/M
__________________
iAltdorf. An interactive map of the capital of the Empire in WFRP!
Download today! Can be used in any fantasy campaign!
http://altdorfer.blogspot.com - Check out the Altdorf Correspondent! A WFRP blog about life in the Imperial capital.
"All editions of D&D are awesome." - Fifth Element (EN World Forums, 2008)
”The tendency to confuse personal taste with objective quality is nearly universal.” - Robin D. Laws – Robin’s Laws of Good Gamemastering (Steve Jackson Games, 2002)
And yet another word from our sponsors
