Quote:
Originally Posted by Settembrini  Well, at least the provided evidence shows that the CM-popular kids-clique-Judges & their Dinner-buddies have agreed upon lying to you the interested fan & customer on at least two occasions to cover up errors in the process.
You might not care for these process-mistakes, but if they really were minor, there would not have been a problem with being frank about it, no?
EDIT: Just to be clear, I´m talking about the pdf-download issue and the Monte Cook submission. Actually with the other pdf download issue regarding last year´s "avoided" law suit, it´s three times of agreement to ly to the public to cover up errors. |
"Agreement to Lie" means conspiracy and collusion, and I see absolutely no evidence of that. Please point out or list this evidence because I either don't see it, or it hasn't been revealed in this thread.
Did they make mistakes? Yes.
Did they have a lack of transparency about them? Yes
Have they come clean about them during the course of this thread? Yes
Do I feel that they acted improprietously? After hearing there explanations and comparing it with what Zach wrote in his resignation and the above link to his posts, 100% NO.
Did they purposely discuss and then decide to not reveal those mistakes? I just don't see it, and don't see anywhere in this thread where that was said. If you were there during these discussions, and have the evidence to back it up, I'm sure everyone would be willing to listen to you. Until then . . .
__________________
Mark
"El Mahdi" Armstrong -
Semper Operor Verus ". . . after all, that is why we're here. Kill the last bad guy and then there's cake." - Major General Jack O'Neal "Don't Just Do It, Just Do It Right!"
"Right, without Reason, is unmitigated Foolishness."
"If you make a mistake, Acknowledge It, then make it Right."
OGL Forever!
And yet another word from our sponsors
