Okay
Settembrini, I see your point to a certain extent, but I just don't see it as purposefully lying. You do see it that way, I understand how you are coming to that, I'll just have to agree to disagree with you.
However, I feel (
IMO) that the majority of their problem here is a lack of transparency. I read some of those posts from Zach from the links a little further up-thread. It was said there that maybe they need a PR person, but instead went for just a submissions manager. Maybe that was a mistake. I think they could really use some PR help.
The reprinting of those e-mails is probably a sore point also. If the people involved with the ENNies felt that Zachs releasing of things discussed in closed meetings was upsetting, then posting private e-mails is probably
very upsetting to them. I see that as a breach of privacy, they probably do also. If not actually required (I don't know if there are laws covering this or not), I think it's at least standard ettiquette to have permission to release private e-mails.
__________________
Mark
"El Mahdi" Armstrong -
Semper Operor Verus ". . . after all, that is why we're here. Kill the last bad guy and then there's cake." - Major General Jack O'Neal "Don't Just Do It, Just Do It Right!"
"Right, without Reason, is unmitigated Foolishness."
"If you make a mistake, Acknowledge It, then make it Right."
OGL Forever!
And yet another word from our sponsors
