Go Back   EN World D&D / RPG News

View Single Post
Old 9th October 2008, 04:58 AM   #23 (permalink)
howandwhy99
Community Supporter
 
howandwhy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,561
Blog Entries: 93
howandwhy99 Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triskaidekafile View Post
In the greater world? Laughed at in normal society? Seriously, what are you talking about? And how is it relevant?

Yes it clears up that you think there's a one true way to play RPGs. That's fine. I don't feel that way. Nor am I going to.
So long as the OP (or anyone else for that matter) and their group are having fun, I don't care if they're rubbing blue mud in their hair and calling it gaming.
Will I personally consider that role playing? No. But that's academic.
Really tired of this whole notion of BadWrongFun that seems to have creeped onto the boards of late.
Again, I am not calling anyone's preferences badwrongfun. They are simply asking for something that RPGs cannot deliver. Doing those things in an acting game can be enjoyable. Neither am I saying there is only one way to play RPGs. I am saying that role-playing is understood as being different than acting and often more clearly outside of the RPG hobby at the moment than within. This looks like one of those moments of confusion. You may not care about being confused, reality outside the hobby, or the common consensus of terms, but it actually does help when people have problems. Like when someone rubs mud in their hair, calls it soup, and cries when the mud manufacturer say its' mud is not fit for consumption.
__________________
Apparently Reagan never played RPGs ...but he liked to watch.
Spoiler:
Participants in the Pentagon simulations were sometimes of very high rank, including members of Congress and White House insiders as well as senior military officers. The identity of many of the participants remains secret even today. It is a tradition in US simulations (and those run by many other nations) that participants are guaranteed anonymity. The main reason for this is that occasionally they may take on a role or express an opinion that is at odds with their professional or public stance (for example portraying a fundamentalist terrorist or advocating hawkish military action), and thus could harm their reputation or career if their in-game persona became widely known.
(cut)
...former US president Ronald Reagan was a keen visitor to simulations conducted in the 1980s, but as an observer only. An official explained: "No president should ever disclose his hand, not even in a war game". Para,6
howandwhy99 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

And yet another word from our sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors... Again
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Site Contents © 2008 ENWorld
PHP Ajax Multimedia Web Framework © 2008 Digital Media Graphix
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

"Vault Data" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.1.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.