Go Back   EN World D&D / RPG News

View Single Post
Old 20th October 2008, 06:31 PM   #50 (permalink)
Raven Crowking
Registered User
 
Raven Crowking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 8,780
Raven Crowking Gnoll Huntmaster (Lvl 5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voadam View Post
I wish the underlying goal of avoiding copy and paste publishing were eliminated and all the resulting limitations that resulted from trying to accomplish it.

Indeed. It is telling that the 3.x SRD was intended to increase what is essentially "cut & paste" publishing under the belief that this would actually increase WotC's profits in the long term.

The most recent writer's digest actually has an article on how giving away materials for free can help a business increase its sales over the long term. This is one of the reasons that you get free electronic books and audio podcasts of novels.....the readers tend to want hardcopy books as well.

I know a lot of folks who have made use of the SRD (including myself, both the WotC version and the Hypertext SRD). In each of these cases, the person also bought physical copies of the books.

While I am sure that the 3.5 SRD in particular cost WotC money, I think that this is more because WotC failed to convince a certain segment of the gaming population that either (1) they needed to convert, or (2) their 3.0 books didn't effectively function as hardcopy for 3.5, or (3) both.

IMHO, that Conan, Iron Heroes, or Arcana Unearthed uses largely the same "engine" as 3.x is a good thing. It means that I can steal from those games to make my D&D game stronger. It means that I can buy & adapt D&D modules and run them in other systems. All roads lead to D&D, and it is the quality of WotC products that largely determines which WotC products I am willing to buy.

The absence of an SRD/game crossover hurts the value I receive from buying a 4e product.

If the official game is a game I want to play, there is no doubt that being "official" is going to boost that game to the top of the heap. If, OTOH, WotC is losing significant money to "non-official" games, perhaps that is because those games are offering something WotC is not? The same holds true for suppliments, etc. "Official" is automatically better unless there is an overwhelming reason why it is not, and if that overwhelming reason exists, then it would only be an asset to WotC to find out what it is.

The genie is already out of the bottle, from 3e. The market is already fragmented. An OGL 4e would ameliorate that fragmentation to the highest possible degree. Continuing down this road will only increase fragmentation over time.

IMHO, of course.


RC
__________________
[A]ny good dungeon will have undiscovered treasures in areas that have been explored by the players, simply because it is impossible to expect that they will find every one of them.

- Module B1, Page 24


Check out My Website!!

RCFG - My free mostly-OGC OGL game!
RCFG is intended to be a fusion between OS & NS playstyles, giving the advantages of SRD-based gaming coupled with quick character and adventure generation and an Old School feel.

First Review!

Private Email
ravencrowking at hotmail dot com

dbishop at danieljbishop dot ca
Raven Crowking is online now   Reply With Quote
 

And yet another word from our sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors... Again
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:48 PM.


Site Contents © 2008 ENWorld
PHP Ajax Multimedia Web Framework © 2008 Digital Media Graphix
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

"Vault Data" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.1.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.