Go Back   EN World D&D / RPG News

View Single Post
Old 28th October 2008, 07:12 PM   #8 (permalink)
Psion
Power Behind the Throne
 
Psion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 17,498
Blog Entries: 10
Psion Hobgoblin Soldier (Lvl 3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry View Post
Single-classing is DEFINITELY stressed over multiclassing. Some can't stand this part, seeing 3E multiclassing as having solved a very important part of 2E's limitations on visualizing a unique character.
To me, that's not a move to being 1e like. It might have matched its intent, but not actual play.

1e and 2e multiclassing and dual-classing were very beneficial. You split XPs between classes, which meant that you had the abilities of 2 or 3 classes at a slightly lower level, but had all the abilities of each of those classes.

Really, 3e's mechanic wherein levels were the root resource instead of classes, made single class characters more common from my perspective.

Quote:
Saving throw "duration roll" targets are static numbers again, instead of variable DCs.
In the face of the fact that the entire structure of saving throws has changed to an entirely new "target DC to cause the effect"/"make save to remove" paradigm, I think the net result is much less 1e.

Quote:
Weird weapons like Gyrspikes, Two-bladed swords, Orc double-axes, etc. are relegated to later books.
And yet, the 1e PHB gives me lovely little oddities like spetums and ranseurs, and bohemian ear-spoons.


Quote:
As Mouseferatu noted, measurements are back in inches, pretty much. Characters in 1E moved at a speed of 12 inches in a full round -- sounds familiar to me.
The mere mention of squares says to me that 4e is much more 3e than 1e. The "5 feet means 1 square thing" came into core rules in 3e. (It might have been in combat & tactics in 2e, but that's not core nor really "old school"... yet.) In 1e there's a reason you used the term inches: because you used a ruler to determine how far you moved or the radius of your spell effect on a surface that was not necessarily gridded.

Other things that seem pretty blatantly "not 1e" to me in 4e. And admittedly, some of these it inherited from 3e:
  • Obsessive balance of options: 4e strives obsessively for the goal of making every race and class equivalent. Things didn't work that way in 1e. Some classes were managed/limited by "brass ring" mechanics (e.g., to be a paladin or ranger, you had to have rolled well enough in your stats), roleplaying restrictions, racial class restrictions or level caps, and limiting combinations of powerful classes with likewise powerful races or multiclassing.
  • Point buy stats the default: is there much else to say? That's old school champions or GURPS, maybe.
  • Spheres/circular areas of effect are round: This relates to the inches thing I was speaking about above.
  • Healing surges: We're not contrasting with 3e anymore; wands of cure light wands were not in 1e. After a knock-down drag-out fight, you pretty much could expect to rest the night. Unless you were brave enough to press on.
  • Majorly different class and race collection: There were no dragonborn, no tieflings (that's SO 2e), no warlords in 1e. There were gnomes in 1e. And eladrin would be called grey elves, and you'd be lucky if your DM let you play one (but you would want to.)
  • Way too consistent: Okay, a lot of these points hinge against 3e, but the fact that 4e inherits so much from 3e is a major part of my point here. To wit, for things like surprise, noticing secret doors, checking for traps, you didn't have a nice, unified skill system to hinge off of. You had a variety of little subsystems that uses a variety of different dice in 1e.
  • Different reality: Finally, the creatures and cosmology saw a major shift from 1e. Deities were redefined and mashed together, the great wheel nowhere to be seen, and succubi on the devils' payroll.
  • Save. Or. Die. Any lock could have a poison in it, any potion you sampled could kill you.
  • An attack is an attack. (Well, at least until OA it was.) There was no menu of different attack options.
  • Vancian magic. Not only is an attack an attack, it's not a spell daily.
  • (Tangible) Alignment and Paladins: In 4e, "unaligned" is an alignment, some of the original alignments have gone missing, and most alignment based magic is gone. This is in stark contrast to 1e, wherein a paladin lost their powers by behavior slips and deviating from you alignment meant paying a few XP to the piper.

To me these are a few of the major elements that make 4e not even remotely 1e/"old school" in feel to me.
__________________
"This game requires no gameboard because the action takes place in your imagination..." - Cover of Dungeons & Dragons Basic Rules Set 1.

Storyteller 92% | Tactician 83% | Butt-Kicker 67% | Power Gamer 67% | Specialist 67% | Method Actor 67% | Casual Gamer 17%

The rules should serve the game, not vice-versa.
Use the rules, but don't let the rules use you!

Last edited by Psion; 29th October 2008 at 12:11 AM.. Reason: Added some...
Psion is offline   Reply With Quote
 

And yet another word from our sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors... Again
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Site Contents © 2008 ENWorld
PHP Ajax Multimedia Web Framework © 2008 Digital Media Graphix
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

"Vault Data" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.1.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.