7th November 2008, 02:21 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
| Arch Chancellor
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Oldenburg, Germany
Posts: 12,843
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallarn  Maybe they trust gamers to invent their own details on top of what they give us? Maybe they want to encourage DM's to make the game their own, by giving them the bare bones of a monster (with description that I find tantalising and full of ideas, but YMMV) and letting them run with it?
I apologise if this sounds snarky, but I am getting quite fed up of seeing people take time to post to a thread just to say "This sucks", effectively. I fully appreciate that 4e isn't to everyone's taste, but if you didn't like something, can you at least be a bit more precise about what you didn't like, and how you'd make it better? | Constructive Criticism is a way of the past. We don't want that anymore, it's too much work.
__________________ Mustrum "Gummibärchen helfen auch" Ridcully Thoughts of the Arch Chancellor - My weblog on EN World - containing game related material, like: house rules, design theories, reviews, play reports, adventure ideas
Secret Member of <Think we would just hide our secret with a spoiler tag, eh?>
|
|  |
And yet another word from our sponsors
