29th November 2008, 10:21 PM
|
#202 (permalink)
|
| Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Posts: 4,144
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadfan  I like this reasoning. First, define the OGL to NOT mean that it grants permission to use the material covered by the OGL- define the OGL to instead grant permission to use the most recent edition of D&D. Then, when a new edition comes out that isn't covered by the OGL, you can argue that the OGL has been killed, even though every single term of the OGL is just as valid now as it was two years ago.
That's complete bunk, of course, but its just plausible enough that I can see someone believing it if they really really wanted to believe. | I see it now. I think that's the idea. I didn't see that before. Of course, it's so ridiculous it didn't even cross my mind.
__________________ Iain Fyffe Original member of the Rouseketeers!
I have played 4E. And just like all other editions of D&D, it is awesome! no one quotes me in sigs - Crothian
For some reason, this doesn't fill me with rage. I must be interwebbing wrong. - Cadfan
|
|  |
And yet another word from our sponsors
