Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadfan  I like this reasoning. First, define the OGL to NOT mean that it grants permission to use the material covered by the OGL- define the OGL to instead grant permission to use the most recent edition of D&D. Then, when a new edition comes out that isn't covered by the OGL, you can argue that the OGL has been killed, even though every single term of the OGL is just as valid now as it was two years ago.
That's complete bunk, of course, but its just plausible enough that I can see someone believing it if they really really wanted to believe. |
This is the important part in commerce. What people believe or want to believe. Btw remember the effect 3.5 had to
OGL publishers?
OGL can be the elixir of happiness, if people do not want to take it, it will not make them happy.
And yet another word from our sponsors
