Quote:
Originally Posted by Dannyalcatraz They're neoclassical- meaning generally they favor a hands off approach to economic policy. IOW, not truly politicized. That kind of theoretical approach would also not impact the empirical sales data that pops up in the majority of RW studies...
This makes me laugh- historically, Chilean, Iraqi and Russian economic practices have virtually ZERO to do with free market capitalism in the Chicago School style. |
I'm sure you have your opinions, but what you're saying doesn't line up with what I read anywhere else.
Chicago School categorized as Neoliberal --
Chicago school of economics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
Chicago School involved in Washington Concensus --
Washington Consensus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Chicago Boys, 25 Chilean ministers trained under Milton Friedman --
Chicago Boys - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia