Go Back   EN World D&D / RPG News

View Single Post
Old 20th April 2009, 06:07 AM   #9 (permalink)
joethelawyer
Registered User
 
joethelawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Posts: 663
Blog Entries: 7
joethelawyer Gnoll Huntmaster (Lvl 5)
Send a message via ICQ to joethelawyer Send a message via AIM to joethelawyer Send a message via MSN to joethelawyer Send a message via Yahoo to joethelawyer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Remathilis View Post
Let me try my skills at mindreading...

You're looking for a system where XP is flat (not dependent on PC level, like UA), but not determined by CR.

For example, a rust monster is CR 3, which determines his XP value in the default system and the UA system (one is dynamic, the other static) but what you want is...

5 HD Aberration = (50 XP x5) = 250 XP
SA: Rust 200 XP
SQ: Scent (100 XP), Darkvision (50 XP)
--------------------------------------
Total: 600 XP

Thost totals are determined by a list that would look something like...

HD Value
Aberration 50 XP/HD
Anaimal 15 XP/HD
Construct 75 XP/HD
...

SA
Breath Weapon, damaging: 20 XP/die of damage
Breath Weapon, debilitating: 500 XP
Frightening Aura: 400 XP
...

SQ
Incorporeal: 1,000 XP
Low Light Vision: 25 XP
DR, Silver: 10 XP/5 points
DR, Good: 40 XP/5 Points
SR: 10 XP per point of SR over 10.
...

You want it balanced to 3.5/Pathfinder's XP tables, but not to an encounters/level system like 3.5 uses.

Sorry, doesn't exist. Upper Krust's CR guide might help, but I don't think anyone's broken down the monsters like this since 2e...

Was I close?
YES!!!! You're Jedi Mind-Reading Skills have grown STRONG!

The ultimate answer I was trying to get at is---if I used a Pathfinder slow XP based game, where I awarded xp for both gold and magic items, how much XP is each monster worth, if I wanted to keep xp progression equivalent or close to how it was with AD&D?

Here is something I put together in a spreadsheet to help me get the basics down, and organize my thoughts. Feel free to add to it or use it.

I wanted to know, using a baseline common to all systems, how many kills does it take under each system to level? So I averaged all the 10 classes xp tables together to get an average AD&D XP needed for each level. I compared that to the Pathfinder slow XP chart, as well as 3.0/3.5's base xp table, on sheet 1 of the Excel Spreadsheet.

The next sheet breaks out, using orc XP as the common denominator, how many orc kills does it take to level under AD&D using AD&D orc xp as compared to Pathfinder slow progression using AD&D orc xp.

Next to that, as per the 3.5 DMG, is the 1/2 CR orc xp, to calculate under Pathfinder slow and the 3.0/3.5 XP tables, how many orcs does it take to level up each level? I could only do these to level 8, because beyond that level you dont get xp for such low CR monsters in 3.0/3.5. In AD&D even at 20th level you got 15 xp for an orc kill. As a total percentage of your xp at that level it was miniscule, since AD&D's xp needed for higher levels were massively more than what's needed in 3.0/3.5.

Lastly, since AD&D used GP and magic items kept as XP, I figured a good way to truly compare the systems on an "orc killed" basis is to deduct the XP gained from non-combat XP from the equation, to see how many orcs are truly needed to level in each system. That number is modifiable if you just change the percentage. I remember readig somewhere that in AD&D 20% of the xp gained came from combat, 80% from gp, magic items, and miscellaneous. That figure felt accurate from my memory of that game.

What I determined by doing this spreadsheet is that I basically could use the Pathfinder slow xp progression tables, and use the AD&D monster manual xp awards, in order to keep PF level progression close to AD&D. Pathfinder slow is harder than AD&D in the early levels, meaning it takes more orc kills to level, and easier than AD&D at later levels. Even that can be taken care of by using the percentage difference as a multiplier to the AD&D monster manual xp awards.

The only factors to take into consideration would be how certain monsters are much tougher in 3.5 relative to PC levels than they were under AD&D. In that case, since there is not a system like you outlined above (AD&D's system, basically ) to determine XP on a monster-by-monster basis for 3.5, I will just have to wing it, and add bonus xp where needed.

What do you think?
Attached Files
File Type: xls xp.xls (36.5 KB, 16 views)
__________________
~Joe
If you like what I said, throw me some XP. I was a goblin sharpshooter for far too long.

Now Blogging at http://wondrousimaginings.blogspot.com/

joetheattorney@yahoo.com
clarencedarrow70 on AIM
Clarencedarrow70@hotmail.com on MSN

Erik Mona: "Woah. Surely you're not _that_ Joe!"
joethelawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
 

And yet another word from our sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors... Again
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 PM.


Site Contents © 2008 ENWorld
PHP Ajax Multimedia Web Framework © 2008 Digital Media Graphix
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

"Vault Data" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.1.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.