Quote:
Originally Posted by Goumindong Man what?
The mark is an effect, like slow, like immobilized etc. |
The only reason the creature knows that it is affected by a condition is the following rule:
Quote:
|
Whenever you affect a creature with a power, that creature knows exactly what you’ve done to it and what conditions you’ve imposed.
|
This is not automatic without this rule to tell people how this works.
So, we have this rule that tells the creature not only that it is marked, but it also tells the creature exactly what was done to it.
So my point is, if you use this rule to inform the creature that is marked, you must also inform the creature "exactly what you've done to it".
If you use a different rule to inform the creature that it is marked, please quote the rule.
My question boiled down to: How do you inform the creature that it is marked without using this rule? If you do use this rule, how do justify using it to inform of the mark WITHOUT informing of all aspects of the mark when the rule states otherwise?
Your POV sidesteps this rule for some aspects of CC (the free attack), but not all aspects of CC (the mark), without stating HOW you sidestep it.
Basically, you are chosing when and how to ignore aspects of this rule and I want to know what your justification is for doing so.
If on the other hand you are not using this rule and you claim that CC is not a power, then how does the creature even know it is marked because the mark portion of CC is also not a power? Which rule are you using to inform the creature of the mark?