Quote:
Originally Posted by Windjammer  I could be reading this wrong, but this comes off as a veiled insult.
And whence the preoccupation to detect/impugn "motifs" to the asking of questions instead of wishing to see them answered? |
Joe is a lawyer.
Joe asked an employee of
WotC, whose been helpful and friendly to the ENWorld community, to make legally inadvisable statements in a public forum.
What do you make of this?
(And it's 'motives', not 'motifs'. Impugning a person's motifs is something done in art, music, or literary criticism
.)
And yet another word from our sponsors
