Temple of Elemental Evil, revised and expanded

[God]

Here goes.
For the past six months or so I’ve been running a 3.5 update of The Temple of Elemental Evil, with the characters currently about half through the second dungeon level of the Temple proper.
I wasn’t very impressed with any of the 3.0/3.5 revisions of ToEE currently floating around the web, so I’ve been revising/expanding the original module as I go, usually just a few steps ahead of the PCs.
I’ve been keeping fairly detailed notes (room descriptions, stat blocks) in a Word .doc as I go and have been considering cleaning it up for anyone else who is interested.
If there’s interest, let me know. If there is, I’d like some feedback from others who are familiar with the adventure as I continue updating the module, and revising the current update.
Here are a few of the major issues/ideas I’ve been grappling with in the course of the conversion, and some reasons why I embarked on this crazy endeavor in the first place:

1) The current conversions available here on ENWorld and elsewhere are 3.0, and not particularly inspired, having opted for a straight across conversion in most cases that leaves a lot to be desired. So, for example, PCs are still fighting unclassed bugbears in the bowels of the dungeon, then coming across a 50,000 gp magic sword in the next. The assumed experience/level progression in 1e (the big bad wizards and clerics near the end of the module are only level 9, followed by an encounter with a demon princess...) doesn’t jive with 3.5. In fact, I fully expect my current group to be level 15-16 by the time they reach the endgame -- they were 3rd level when entered the Moathouse dungeon, and 5th or 6th when they entered the actual Temple. So as I’ve updated the adventure I’ve been keeping a running log of XP and loot, bumping up most monsters/NPCs to better match expected PC levels.

2) Just as the 1e level progression doesn’t hold up well in 3.5, the adventure (great as it is) feels outdated in its design principles. Although it’s not really feasible (or desirable) to turn ToEE into anything other than a dungeon crawl, room after room featuring identical bugbears gets old, quick. So in a number of cases I’ve strayed a bit from the published module (revising, rather than converting), subbing out monsters for more mixed groups. There’s also a lot of the “save or die” (or just, die) kind of elements that I’m personally not fond of, so I’ve gotten rid of some of that, as well.

3) Verisimilitude is distinctly lacking in some areas. The Temple itself, for example, includes quite a few large (or larger) monsters, but features a single unlocked means of access -- one that not only is too small for most of them but also leads through a wizard’s supposedly secret quarters. I’ve tried to avoid modifying the maps whenever possible, but in that case, at least, was forced to add an additional means of egress on the first dungeon level. Similarly, there’s the issue of NPC A.I., so to speak -- or the complete lack thereof. It appears to be assumed that dungeon denizens will sit blithely in their own rooms as the party one by one destroys their neighbors, never investigating or mounting any kind of counter-offensive. In some cases this is fine -- the various Temple factions are often warring among themselves -- but in others is too implausible. So I’ve been building in contingencies and modifying tactics accordingly.

4) I’ve tried to expand on the action in Hommlet an Nulb, adding sidequests here and there, many based on encounters from the (quite good) ToEE computer game from a few years back. This added quite a few more opportunities for roleplaying before hitting the dungeon crawly meat of the Temple, as well as the XP needed so the group wasn’t totally overwhelmed on entry.

5) Finally, I’ve been trying to work in some of the Greyhawk lore that has come after the original module was written, especially as it concerns The Elder Elemental Eye/The Big T.

Anyway, post is getting long so I’ll wrap up. Any interest? Any feedback? If so, I’ll post some more specific examples of what I’ve been doing.

[freyar]

Yeah, I'd love to see this. I guess this wouldn't fit the requirements for posting the conversion in the library (since it's not a straight conversion), but I've been pondering how to make sense of ToEE, too, so it'd be great to know someone else's take.

[bigznak]

yeah this is one of my favorite old adventures so anything you have done would be awesome to see.

Thanks ahead of time.

[Kafkonia]

I'd like to see what you've done. I'm using HackMaster's riff on ToEE for my campaign, and I'd like to see if I can glean any ideas from what you've done (although the thematic flavour is quite different between elements and existentialism.)

[God]

Ok, seems like there's at least some interest here and over at the WotC boards, so I'll be following up soon with some more posts on a thread I started there:
http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=802012

[Vague Jayhawk]

I will soon be running my own conversion of TOEE for my players and I would absolutely love to see what you have done with it. I noticed the same problems that you did and have been attempting to think of solutions for them. I want my players to have as much fun with this as I did when I went through it 15 or so years ago. I would greatly appreciate anything that you have to share.

Edit: I followed your link to Wizards and you have got a real good start there. As long as you keep posting you have a loyal reader.

[TheYeti1775]

If you want to send a copy my way, I would love it.

Have great memories of TOEE, it was the first D&D module I was introduced to. And also the first one I ran on my own.

[DrQuiz]

Hey I did a similar thing for the Return to TOEE. I thought a lot the encounters were hokey and out of date. So I revamped encounters using Metacreator "no plug intended." This made it go a bit faster. I also added other raiding parties to the dungeon with their own agenda. Mainly the Scarlet Brotherhood for the THarzidum, Ithillid raiding parties, Drow for the LLoth angle, Iuz's minioins etc. The Main Tharzidum baddies I upgraded to 3.5. and cut out the whole Imrix Prince of fire just too ridiculous and hard to play. The maps stayed intact.

[Reveille]

I'd love to see it done!

[dragonlordofpoondari]

count me in too!

[BOZ]

if you'd find it useful, we converted Imix to 3.5 for Dragon #347 last year.

[HandofMystra]

ditto. I would like to run some classic modules but am too new (as player and DM) to know what to substitute in for monsters. When I heard room after room of bugbears, I thought, Oh just give them class levels to make them different. I imagine that you can do better than that.

[KYvampyre]

I'm getting ready to start a new campaign using ToEE and I'd love to see your conversion work if you have the time to send it to me.

Thanks in advance.

[Thurbane]

I'd love to see a 3.5 conversion of ToEE - I have many great memories of playing the original.