Go Back   EN World D&D / RPG News > D&D 3rd Edition and Older > D&D 3rd Edition Rules

D&D 3rd Edition Rules This forum is for pre-4E D&D Rules questions and queries about character design/tweaking.

 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24th April 2009, 10:12 PM   #21 (permalink)
Registered User
 
SolitonMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 205
SolitonMan Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Send a message via AIM to SolitonMan Send a message via Yahoo to SolitonMan
Page 284 of the DMG in the description of mithral : "Heavy armors are treated as medium, and medium armors are treated as light, but light armors are still treated as light." Only seems complicated if you're going spend too much time parsing words and thinking about it. I never even considered it an issue until I saw people discussing it on the boards. Always seemed obvious that mithral breastplate is light armor, and mithral full plate is medium armor.
__________________
Nothing is true. Everything is permitted. Anything is possible.

"Let's look Death in the face and say, 'Whatever, man!'" - Hugo 'Hurley' Reyes
SolitonMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th April 2009, 11:31 PM   #22 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Jhaelen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,689
Jhaelen Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolitonMan View Post
Always seemed obvious that mithral breastplate is light armor, and mithral full plate is medium armor.
Yep, because it IS obvious. For some reason in this thread I only see the posts of people agreeing about this...
Jhaelen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009, 12:59 AM   #23 (permalink)
Registered User
 
sgaff24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
sgaff24 Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
While I agree with pretty much everyone here on this topic let me play devils advocate for a second.

Proficiency is not just the ability to wear and move in the armor. I think it also is the ability to put it on and to maintain it. I have no experience with armor but full-plate looks really hard to put on correctly, isn't that why knights usually have squires to help them put on armor? Another thing to consider is repariing all of the dents that get put into a piece of armor after every battle. This post might be out of the scope of the topic but it kind of makes sense. Why do I need to have the light armor proficiency to be able to wear a chain shirt, don't I just put it over my head and put my arms through the sleeves? Is part of the proficiency feat knowing how to take care of the shirt so it does not rust with a week a hard work and sweat? I have seen what sweat can do to steel.

I don't know just some ramblings I thought of while reading this.
sgaff24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009, 01:23 AM   #24 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Theroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,516
Theroc Kobold Slinger (Lvl 1)
Send a message via MSN to Theroc
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgaff24 View Post
While I agree with pretty much everyone here on this topic let me play devils advocate for a second.

Proficiency is not just the ability to wear and move in the armor. I think it also is the ability to put it on and to maintain it. I have no experience with armor but full-plate looks really hard to put on correctly, isn't that why knights usually have squires to help them put on armor? Another thing to consider is repariing all of the dents that get put into a piece of armor after every battle. This post might be out of the scope of the topic but it kind of makes sense. Why do I need to have the light armor proficiency to be able to wear a chain shirt, don't I just put it over my head and put my arms through the sleeves? Is part of the proficiency feat knowing how to take care of the shirt so it does not rust with a week a hard work and sweat? I have seen what sweat can do to steel.

I don't know just some ramblings I thought of while reading this.
If proficiency wasn't just wearing it properly, then wearing non-proficient armor would place wear and tear on the armor, and the RAW would likely have mentioned SOMETHING about non-combat related penalties besides attack/armor check penalties.
__________________


Source Materials I am able to access:


Accessible at almost any time:
http://www.d20srd.org/index.htm
Complete Arcane
Complete Scoundrel
Complete Mage
Complete Divine
Libre Mortis
Heroes of Horror
Drow of the Underdark
Monster Manual 3.5E
Monster Manual 2
DMG/PHB
Psionics Handbook
Expanded Psionics Handbook
Spell Compendium
Tome of Magic

These I can access rarely:
Complete Adventurer
Complete Warrior
Complete Psionic
Races of Stone
Draconomicon
Complete Champion
A few assorted Monstrous Manuals... I can't recall which ones.

I MAY be able to access the Forgotten Realms and Eberron Campaign settings.
Theroc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009, 06:12 AM   #25 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 69
risner Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Wilder View Post
In 3.5, a PC with Medium Armor Proficiency is considered proficient with mithral full plate. It's a common houserule to go the other way, though.
The RAW is unspecific enough to conclude what it means. The RAW can mean it does grant proficiency (if proficiency is read to be a limitation) or to not grant proficiency (if you interpret it to not be a limitation but rather a requirement.)

In short, there is nothing in the DMG/PHB to cover this question. It is entirely a DM call. If you wish for hints, the FAQ suggested a DM rule that it grants proficiency.
risner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009, 08:44 PM   #26 (permalink)
Geek Credit Score: 840
 
Jeff Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Daly City, California
Posts: 2,602
Jeff Wilder has disabled Experience Points
Quote:
Originally Posted by risner View Post
In short, there is nothing in the DMG/PHB to cover this question. It is entirely a DM call. If you wish for hints, the FAQ suggested a DM rule that it grants proficiency.
There are many, many other "hints" that it works like that (see upthread). (Functionally. The way it actually works is not that there's any proficiency granted, it's just that the armor functions as a category lighter for terms of proficiency.)

For what it's worth, I personally don't think it should count for the purpose of proficiency -- and Steve summed up my rationale, though I also think it just makes mithral Too Good -- so I'm not fond of the 3.5 rule, and I'm glad Pathfinder's explicitly going the other way.
__________________
Jeff Wilder, San Francisco Bay Area
If your sig is longer than your posts, your sig is too
long
. Nobody reads it, they just get annoyed by it.

And if you bore me, you lose your soul to me. - Belly
Jeff Wilder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009, 09:29 PM   #27 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,021
Starbuck_II Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Wilder View Post
There are many, many other "hints" that it works like that (see upthread). (Functionally. The way it actually works is not that there's any proficiency granted, it's just that the armor functions as a category lighter for terms of proficiency.)

For what it's worth, I personally don't think it should count for the purpose of proficiency -- and Steve summed up my rationale, though I also think it just makes mithral Too Good -- so I'm not fond of the 3.5 rule, and I'm glad Pathfinder's explicitly going the other way.
Is the Gamma version out?

Because in Beta, Celestial Armor still makes it light armor. Same as Full plate of Speed (becomes meduim). Evlen Chain is there (light armor).

Seems like Pathfinder didn't change a thing. Unless I missed something...
__________________
"If you can't believe in yourself, believe in me who believes in you."

and

"Go beyond the impossible, and kick reason to the curb"
Kamina, from Gurren Lagann
Starbuck_II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009, 10:15 PM   #28 (permalink)
Geek Credit Score: 840
 
Jeff Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Daly City, California
Posts: 2,602
Jeff Wilder has disabled Experience Points
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbuck_II View Post
Seems like Pathfinder didn't change a thing. Unless I missed something...
You missed a post Jason B. made wherein he stated that the final version of Pathfinder would explicitly spell out the "doesn't count for proficiency" thing.
__________________
Jeff Wilder, San Francisco Bay Area
If your sig is longer than your posts, your sig is too
long
. Nobody reads it, they just get annoyed by it.

And if you bore me, you lose your soul to me. - Belly
Jeff Wilder is offline   Reply With Quote


Bookmarks

Tags
armor, mithral, proficiency

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


And yet another word from our sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors... Again
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 AM.


Site Contents © 2008 ENWorld
PHP Ajax Multimedia Web Framework © 2008 Digital Media Graphix
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

"Vault Data" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.1.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.