Wound System - EN World: Your Daily RPG Magazine
126762 gamers and counting!

Go Back   EN World: Your Daily RPG Magazine > General Discussion > D&D 4th Edition Discussion
Not a member yet? REGISTER your account!

Notices

D&D 4th Edition Discussion Discuss D&D 4E rules and house rules in here.

Visit Our Sponsors
Subscribe!
EN World: Your Daily RPG Magazine
All the latest EN World official reviews, columns, and subscriber articles here. Don't have your subscription yet? It's only $3 a month and you can grab it right here!
Subscribe to RSS Follow EN World on Twitter Use our Facebook App Free iPhone App Free Android App EN World TV Subscribers Content Subscribe! Search Send me a Scoop
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12th September 2008, 08:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
77IM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 464
Wound System

So, this idea is not at all original. It came from Keith Baker. I just wrote it up in a slightly more "formal" way, and included the idea of players accepting wounds voluntarily (which I also stole, from the upcoming A Song of Ice and Fire RPG). Please let me know if these seem balanced, usable, etc.

-- 77IM




Wounds
Some stories are more interesting if the protagonists suffer grievous wounds in the course of their quest, and must cope with broken arms, internal bleeding, and dizzying blows to the head. Because of the fast-paced action-oriented nature of D&D, these rules assume that wounds are a somewhat rare occurrence. A player facing a difficult encounter can choose to become crippled rather than face defeat, and it's possible to deliberately wound someone, rather than slay them. Both options are meant to use wounds as interesting plot elements, not simulate tissue trauma in general (the hit point system already does a sufficient job of that).

Characters who are severely damaged can elect to take a wound instead of hit point damage. Wounds cause long-lasting penalties and may hamper the character's performance over the course of many adventures. Wounds are similar to diseases in many ways, including the use of a "wound track," but they are not diseases -- immunity to disease does not protect against a wound, and the Cure Disease ritual does not affect wounds.

SUFFER WOUND: Free Action
  • Negate Damage: Use this action when you take damage. You negate damage from a single source, up to your healing surge value. For example, if your healing surge value is 14, and you fall off a cliff for 19 damage, you would only suffer 5 damage for the fall.
  • Stabilize When Dying: You can also use this action when you are dying. You heal an amount equal to your healing surge value (as though you had rolled a 20 on your dying save). You must use this action before you are actually dead (you can't fail your final death save and then decide to suffer a wound).
  • Costs a Healing Surge: Suffering a wound uses up a healing surge, but you don't get the normal benefits of using a healing surge. You must have at least one healing surge available to suffer a wound.
  • Gain a Wound of the DM's Choice: You immediately gain a wound. The DM selects the type of wound based on manner in which you took damage. The level of the wound is equal to the level of the creature, trap, or hazard that inflicted the damage, or equal to the level of the encounter if it wasn't inflicted by a creature, trap, or hazard. If you suffer a wound outside of an encounter, the DM selects the level of the wound.

INFLICT WOUND: Part of an attack
  • Declare Before you Attack: You must declare your attempt to wound an opponent before making your attack roll. You must also specify what type of wound your attack will cause.
  • Damage Penalty: Your attack takes a damage penalty equal to the victim's healing surge value. Unlike most damage penalties, this can reduce the damage from your attack to 0 (but not below 0).
  • Damage Causes the Wound: If your attack deals at least 1 point of damage (after applying the penalty), your victim suffers the wound you specified, in addition to the damage. If the damage was reduced to 0, the victim doesn't suffer the wound -- they are too tough, or they were able to evade your fancy maneuver.
  • Wound Level: The wound's level is equal to your level.

Wound Effects
Any sort of wound hampers your mobility a bit, imposing a -2 penalty on all Acrobatics, Athletics and Stealth checks. Each wound has additional penalties, based on the part of the body it affects.
  • Head Wound: You suffer a -2 penalty on Perception and Insight checks, and on all attack rolls based upon Intelligence, Wisdom, and Charisma. You can only suffer one head wound at a time.
  • Arm Wound: You can no longer hold a shield in that arm, and take a -2 penalty on all attack rolls using a weapon held in that arm, and a -2 penalty on Thievery checks using that arm. You can have one arm wound per arm.
  • Leg Wound: Your speed is decreased by 2. You can have one leg wound per leg.
  • Vitals Wound: You take a -2 penalty to your Fortitude, Reflex, and Will defenses. There is no limit to the number of vitals wounds you can suffer.
Penalties from multiple wounds stack.

Curing Wounds
Wounds use a wound track, similar to the disease track. Unlike a disease, the penalties from the wound don't get any better or worse at each stage in the track. You suffer the full penalties from the wound until you are cured.

Cured <- Initial <-> Worsening -> Permanent

After each extended rest, make an Endurance check.

Stable DC = 10 + 1/2 the wound's level
Improve DC = 20 + 1/2 the wound's level

If you beat the wound's improve DC, your wound moves one step up the track. If you beat the wound's stable DC, nothing happens. If you fail to hit the wound's stable DC, you move one step down the track. Your wound starts in the initial state. When it moves into the cured state, you no longer suffer any effects from the wound. If it reaches the permanent state, you no longer make Endurance checks after extended rests.

Another character can use the Heal skill to treat a wound. This works exactly like using the Heal skill to treat disease.

There is also a ritual available, Cure Wound. This ritual is identical to Cure Disease in every way, except that it cures wounds instead of diseases. It is a separate ritual from Cure Disease (knowing one ritual does not mean you know the other -- you must learn them both separately).

Comments
  
  awesome wound system
77IM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2008, 05:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
Syrsuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lawrence, IN
Posts: 484
Can you provide a link back to Keith's original description of the idea?

I like it (especially for times when the party is low on healing) - or rather I like it better than any of the other suggestions I've seen for wound type effects and it may break my longstanding objection to wounds.

Carl
Syrsuro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2008, 11:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Organising a posse to kill Winter

Registered User
 
jbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Online
Posts: 2,114
Yeah, pretty cool, definitely a better option to take than dying, and it fits in with the idea that HP represent near misses, scratches and close shaves until being seriously hit when you drop to 0. So, what are the effects of each wound wosening and becoming permanent and do you have a table for the wound level and the wound caused... I guess I'll just just make my own. cheers for posting the idea.
jbear is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2008, 03:45 AM   #4 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 262
At higher levels these become trivial as the Heal skill goes up? Is that per plan or per side effect of the escalating skills? Granted the character would suffer the ill effects until the extended rest but a Trained Healer with a decent stats is quickly going to be able to cure these with a reasonable percentage of time.

Given the ability to heal is always going to be based on a person's body more than any doctor's skills, what about the Heal check adding a bonus to the characters endurance check to actually heal?

D
DanmarLOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2008, 11:55 AM   #5 (permalink)
Organising a posse to kill Winter

Registered User
 
jbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Online
Posts: 2,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanmarLOK View Post
At higher levels these become trivial as the Heal skill goes up? Is that per plan or per side effect of the escalating skills? Granted the character would suffer the ill effects until the extended rest but a Trained Healer with a decent stats is quickly going to be able to cure these with a reasonable percentage of time.

Given the ability to heal is always going to be based on a person's body more than any doctor's skills, what about the Heal check adding a bonus to the characters endurance check to actually heal?

D
But the wound adds the monsters level that made the wound, and as you go up level the monsters you fight would also be a higher level so the wound is harder to cure, which means even though your heal skill goes up too healing wounds shouldnt become trivial, at least thats how i understood it.
jbear is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2008, 04:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 262
Ahh, I missed that part. It takes care of the scaling skills although in an odd fashion in terms of verisimilitude. (A axe blow from a human militia < axe blow from a minotaur)

What about falling down a cliff? 1/2 height divided by 5?

All kidding aside, it does seem worthy of playtesting at the very least even with the extra bookkeeping.

Without a trained healer though, it might be impossible for a character to ever improve outside rolling a 20?

Improve = 20+1/2 creatures level.

Level 3 Whosit nails the Petey the 1st level Mage with a grievous blow and rather than dying he takes a wound. Petey isn't trained in Endurance and has a 10 constitution. His target DC is 21. The best he can do is a natural 20. Unless 20's always succeed on these he'll never heal and on average he'll need 10 days or so to get his natural 20.

Granted that in a 'normal' group there should be someone with Healing trained.

That gives us a +5 so Petey recovers roughly every 2 days on average.

If said healer also has a high wisdom we get a +9 and Petey recovers slightly less than once every day per wound.

I had thought to ask, reaslistically the more wounds a person has the harder it'll be for them to heal as their body has to split resources but that just sends the odds of recovery spiraling down rather quickly.

Honestly this is the one time I might go with Wizard's new chart and make the DC's a 5 for Stable and a 15 for Improve. That means under the care and guidence of a trained healer the character doesn't worsen which is realistic and again with the help and care of a trained healer the character has a better than average chance to recover.
DanmarLOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 11:02 AM   #7 (permalink)
Organising a posse to kill Winter

Registered User
 
jbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Online
Posts: 2,114
I guess if none of Peteys friend are healers, they can try and keep him stable while they take him back to town to see the doctor. I, personally, would allow an improve on a natural 20 whatever the situation.

As far as multiple wound recovery, maybe the DC increases by 2 for each wound. I dont know if you can make a roll for each wound or only one each day. Wounds tend to recover simultaneously, so it makes sense to make a seperate roll for each.

Petey has a broken arm, a punctured lung and serious concussion after a heated discussion with his unhappy half orc girlfriend.
Under the care of the hot half elf neighbourhood priest (reason for the initial discussion) he makes a roll for each wound once each day. with 2 extra wounds each roll as made at DC +4. He recovers quickly from the cuncussuion, his lung stabilses but his arm has gone numb and has a funny smell. Now with one extra wound (apart from the first) to recover from, he makes two recovery checks daily at CD +2...
Soon he's up and about, with a few gorey scars to tell the tale, and all is well until Petey sneaks back home to pack his suitcase and flee, when suddenly the bedroom door creaks open...
jbear is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 02:36 PM   #8 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
Crashy75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 244
Overall I like your implementation. A few thoughts.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 77IM View Post
...
SUFFER WOUND: Free Action
  • Negate Damage: Use this action when you take damage. You negate damage from a single source, up to your healing surge value. For example, if your healing surge value is 14, and you fall off a cliff for 19 damage, you would only suffer 5 damage for the fall.
  • Stabilize When Dying: You can also use this action when you are dying. You heal an amount equal to your healing surge value (as though you had rolled a 20 on your dying save). You must use this action before you are actually dead (you can't fail your final death save and then decide to suffer a wound).
  • Costs a Healing Surge: Suffering a wound uses up a healing surge, but you don't get the normal benefits of using a healing surge. You must have at least one healing surge available to suffer a wound.
  • Gain a Wound of the DM's Choice: You immediately gain a wound. The DM selects the type of wound based on manner in which you took damage. The level of the wound is equal to the level of the creature, trap, or hazard that inflicted the damage, or equal to the level of the encounter if it wasn't inflicted by a creature, trap, or hazard. If you suffer a wound outside of an encounter, the DM selects the level of the wound.
I would specify that you still take a minimum of 1 point of damage to coincide with the inflict wound below. Otherwise, a player might argue that he shouldn't receive a wound if he took no damage.

Quote:
INFLICT WOUND: Part of an attack
  • Declare Before you Attack: You must declare your attempt to wound an opponent before making your attack roll. You must also specify what type of wound your attack will cause.
  • Damage Penalty: Your attack takes a damage penalty equal to the victim's healing surge value. Unlike most damage penalties, this can reduce the damage from your attack to 0 (but not below 0).
  • Damage Causes the Wound: If your attack deals at least 1 point of damage (after applying the penalty), your victim suffers the wound you specified, in addition to the damage. If the damage was reduced to 0, the victim doesn't suffer the wound -- they are too tough, or they were able to evade your fancy maneuver.
  • Wound Level: The wound's level is equal to your level.
One concern I have is that inflicting a penalty is, in general, better than doing damage. Obviously, the tougher the opponent, the better to wound. It's hard to imagine that PC's wouldn't want to give your elites/solos some vital or arm wounds at some point. However, I know their HP can be out of this world so perhaps I'm worried over nothing. Personally, I would do one of the following:
  • #1: Make the ability to wound 1x/encounter rather than at-will.
  • #2: Create special powers that wound. This way, not all characters can inflict wounds. The rogue, ranger and fighter seem the most likely candidates (in that order). This would probably go well with #3 below.
  • #3: An interesting twist would be to allow your BBEG to take a wound just as a pc could. I'd limit this to 1x/encounter. Or you could allow all elites/solos this ability. The monsters probably shouldn't get up after they've been taken down, but perhaps it could be an automatic elite/solo ability when a creature would otherwise be reduced to 0 hp.
  • #4: Don't allow the PC's to choose what kind of wound they can inflict. The vitals wound in particular looks especially tempting.
Quote:
Wound Effects
Any sort of wound hampers your mobility a bit, imposing a -2 penalty on all Acrobatics, Athletics and Stealth checks. Each wound has additional penalties, based on the part of the body it affects.
  • Head Wound: You suffer a -2 penalty on Perception and Insight checks, and on all attack rolls based upon Intelligence, Wisdom, and Charisma. You can only suffer one head wound at a time.
  • Arm Wound: You can no longer hold a shield in that arm, and take a -2 penalty on all attack rolls using a weapon held in that arm, and a -2 penalty on Thievery checks using that arm. You can have one arm wound per arm.
  • Leg Wound: Your speed is decreased by 2. You can have one leg wound per leg.
  • Vitals Wound: You take a -2 penalty to your Fortitude, Reflex, and Will defenses. There is no limit to the number of vitals wounds you can suffer.
Penalties from multiple wounds stack.
A head wound should give a penalty to constitution attacks. (looks at the warlock). Also, shouldn't the head wound give a penalty to all knowlege-like skills? I've had a concussion and I tell ya, it does feel like the intelligence gets knocked out of you. I wouldn't want to have to take a math or history test afterward.
Also, to go with the abstract nature of D&D, perhaps arm wounds could give a -2 penalty to Str/Dex attacks (as well as thievery checks). The shield penalty seems harsh as it penalizes one combat style over others. I know it sounds weird, but I'd make this a 1x injury (one arm could be badly injured or both mildly injured.
Quote:
Curing Wounds
Wounds use a wound track, similar to the disease track. Unlike a disease, the penalties from the wound don't get any better or worse at each stage in the track. You suffer the full penalties from the wound until you are cured.

Cured <- Initial <-> Worsening -> Permanent

After each extended rest, make an Endurance check.

Stable DC = 10 + 1/2 the wound's level
Improve DC = 20 + 1/2 the wound's level

If you beat the wound's improve DC, your wound moves one step up the track. If you beat the wound's stable DC, nothing happens. If you fail to hit the wound's stable DC, you move one step down the track. Your wound starts in the initial state. When it moves into the cured state, you no longer suffer any effects from the wound. If it reaches the permanent state, you no longer make Endurance checks after extended rests.

Another character can use the Heal skill to treat a wound. This works exactly like using the Heal skill to treat disease.
Personally, I think the penalties imposed by wounds should get worse if they move in the wrong direction.
Quote:
There is also a ritual available, Cure Wound. This ritual is identical to Cure Disease in every way, except that it cures wounds instead of diseases. It is a separate ritual from Cure Disease (knowing one ritual does not mean you know the other -- you must learn them both separately).
[/QUOTE]
I don't think there should be a cure wounds ritual simply because wounds are a player choice. If a pc could choose to gain a disease instead of death the cure disease ritual would become a lot more valuable. I think a ritual of this nature defeats the purpose of the mechanic.

However, an interesting idea would be to give specific diseases/maladies in lieu of the 'permanent' affect. For example, if your arm reaches the 'permanent' tier, it becomes gangrenous (I know I saw a gangrene disease somewhere around here). This is a disease that can be treated in the normal way. If the disease is treated (via heal or ritual) then the arm could go back to 'worsening' if you don't really want permanent injuries (as the introduction of a 'cure wounds' suggests) or just make it permanent.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mourn
Well, if I was a wall, I wouldn't be expecting a dagger in my kidney, so a sneak attack would definitely take me off-guard.
Crashy75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 04:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 213
With the way monster HP are in 4e I think it is going to be too difficult to intentionally wound an enemy, you would be much better off just killing it normally.

A 40HP monster, you would need to do more than 10hp of damage to wound it (difficult but not impossible)
A 80HP monster, you would need to do 20 (much more difficult).

Damage per hit doesn't scale up as quick as hp per level, the reason being as that as you increase in level you have more encounter and daily powers than you do at lower levels, so over the course of many rounds you can do more damage.

If you can handle the book keeping then the system looks fine for PC's, but you might want to run the numbers a bit more at higher levels to check if the system is still viable to use against foes.

I could see the system being fun though - "kick in in the voonerables!"
MrBeens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 09:54 PM   #10 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 71
An 80 HP monster is roughly 6-7th level. With a daily or 2W encounter power, it is not terribly difficult to do 20+ damage in a single attack, and a Brutal Scoundrel Rogue (Dex 18/Str 16) should be able to do it routinely at 6th level: 1d4 (Dagger) +4 (Dex) +1 (Light Blade Focus) +2 (+2 Enhancement) +2d8+3 (Brutal Backstabber Sneak Attack) for 21.5 on average. A 1st level Dwarf fighter averages 22.5 damage with a Brute Strike and that's reliable.

Putting wounds on high level solos and elites will likely require critical hits, or not be possible at all (Elder Green Dragons (lvl 20 Solo) have 910 hits points, and I don't think anyone can do 227 points of damage in a single hit). Which is probably fair. High level solos are already subject to too many Daze and Stun effects.
mlangsdorf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2008, 08:13 PM   #11 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
77IM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 464
Here is an additional subsystem to address some issues with wounds. In particular, the case that wounds may become trivial to heal, which means that PCs can accept wounds more often (and multiple at a time), which means extra healing surges during combat, making the game easier.


Scars
Whenever you suffer a wound, you also get a scar. The scar isn't necessarily externally visible -- it may be internal damage, a wonky knee, or just extra fragility. Scars make it harder to heal wounds:

Improve DC = 20 + 1/2 the wound's level + your number of scars

When you gain a level, you lose a scar. You can't have fewer than 0 scars, and there is no other way to lose a scar than by gaining levels.


...
This means that the dwarf fighter with the ungodly Con and Skill Focus: Endurance can no longer gleefully accept wounds, secure in the knowledge that he only needs to roll like a 5 in order to overcome it. That will work for him the first few times but every wound takes its toll and eventually he will have much more trouble recovering.

I'm not totally sure I like this rule. It seems like it would work -- the lingering effect of scars create a sort of feedback-loop so that the high-Con dwarf reaches "wound equilibrium" with the other party members -- but the additional tracking of scars seems like a bit too much bookkeeping.

I'm considering dropping the Inflict Wound action. The goal is to make wounds uncommon, but meaningful; maybe allowing PCs to always choose a wound (and the DM chooses when monsters take wounds) would model that better. Likewise, the stabilize-upon-dying seems abusable. Every PC would always choose this over rolling their third death save. Maybe wounds should just take globally longer to heal, or inflict worse penalties (like, you become dazed until you can take a short rest, or something).

-- 77IM
77IM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2008, 11:24 PM   #12 (permalink)
is lurking

Aut Tyalie
 
Primitive Screwhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 2,793
See post #13 directly below for a better write-up of where I was going...
*Yoink*

==original==
I like this idea, but I think the OP is too complex to implement smoothly at my table.

I would be more inclined to trim it down to:

Quote:
Originally Posted by revised Wounds
<snip>
This way wounds are a valid, cinematic option for the players that has relatively long term effects without bogging down with record keeping.

Of course, I could be wrong
__________________
Aut Tyalie is Elvish for "Go Play Games"


Best of EnWorld: Stalker0's Obsideon Skill Challenge, Stalker0's Guide to the Anti-Grind

Last edited by Primitive Screwhead; 6th November 2008 at 10:35 PM..
Primitive Screwhead is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2008, 11:49 PM   #13 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
77IM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 464
Alternate (simpler?) rules

Here's an alternate set of rules. These attempt to make suffering a wound into a "desperation move." If you're going to die or you're in a super tough fight, it may be better to take the hit points now and suffer the long-term effects of the wound.

-- 77IM


Wounds

SUFFER WOUND: Not an action
  • At Any Time: You don't need to be conscious to suffer a wound. You can suffer a wound in response to an enemy's attack, or when you are about to die, or during your turn. You can't suffer a wound once you are dead, or if you are at full hit points, or if you are out of healing surges.
  • Spend a Healing Surge: You spend a healing surge and regain hit points equal to your surge value, as normal. However, you can choose to heal fewer hit points; the amount of hit points you heal factors into the wound recovery DC (below). You can't suffer a wound if you are out of healing surges.
  • Dazed: You become dazed (save ends).
  • Gain a Wound: You gain a wound, but don't suffer any of its effects until after you have taken a short rest. (Adrenaline keeps you going after you recover from being dazed.) Record the wound, and number of hit points that you healed as a result of gaining the wound.

Wound Effects
You suffer a -1 penalty per wound to all attack rolls, skill checks, ability checks, saving throws, speed, and your maximum number of healing surges. This is cumulative; if you have 3 wounds, you suffer a -3 penalty.

Wound Recovery
After an extended rest, you may make an Endurance check to recover from one of your wounds. You don't need to attempt a recovery check if you don't want to. Another character can use the Heal skill to tend your wound; use their Heal check result or your Endurance result, whichever is higher.

The DC of the wound check is based on the number of hit points you healed when acquiring the wound.

Wound Recovery DC = 10 + half the number of hit points you healed when you suffered the wound
  • Success: If you succeed on three wound recovery checks for the same wound, that wound is cured; you lose the wound and no longer suffer its penalties. These success don't need to be consecutive, but each one comes from a separate recovery check (so you need at least three extended rests to cure a wound, assuming you succeed on each recovery check).
  • Failure: If you fail on three wound recovery checks, that wound is permanent, and you can no longer make recovery checks to attempt to cure it (although it can still be cured by the Cure Wound ritual). However, you no longer suffer any penalties from this wound, except for the penalty to your maximum number of healing surges.
  • Multiple Wounds: You can only make one recovery check for one wound per extended rest. Track the successes and failures for each wound separately.


Example:
Hrothbert the 6th-level dwarf is bleeding out, felled by an elite orc shaman and his followers. The fight is going badly for his party, but they're out of healing words. Hrothbert decides to wrench himself off the ground and get back into the game! He heals his surge value (15 hit points) and stands up, dazed. His presence makes enough of a difference in the fight for the party to be victorious!

After a short rest, Hrothbert suffers the effects of his wounds: -1 to pretty much everything. The group trudges back to town so Hrothbert can start taking extended rests at the inn. After each one, he makes an Endurance check, DC 17 (1/2 of 15 = 7, +10 = 17). Over four days of resting, he fails the first check, succeeds on the next two, and then fails the fourth. On the fifth day, Hrothbert must decide whether to even attempt the recovery check. If he succeeds, he's cured of that wound forever. If he fails, he's stuck with reduced healing surges until he can get magical aid. Maybe he should forgo his recovery check tonight, and seek out someone with a decent Heal modifier to help on his final check?


...
This version of the rules does away with the disease-track and instead tracks successes (kind of like a personal mini skill challenge). I like this because it means that the fastest any character can cure themselves is 3 rests, and I think it better represents the flow of a wound: wounds never get worse over time, they either go away or become a permanent nuisance.

Also, I did some math and it turns out that 1/2 your surge value (which is 1/8 your hit points) advances at a rate that is reasonably similar to your Endurance modifier. Plus, high-HP characters are likely to have a good Endurance, and vice-versa, providing some natural balancing between the tough fighter and frail wizard (so that recovery checks are never too easy or too hard for any character).

Last edited by 77IM; 6th November 2008 at 12:04 AM..
77IM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2008, 11:54 PM   #14 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
77IM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 464
Primitive Screwhead: I really like that idea about permanent wounds reducing your healing surges instead of just getting stuck with the penalty. It seems easy to use in play and is a better decision for the players: Most characters would be crippled if they were stuck with those penalties, but -1 surge isn't an issue for most people, because the PCs rarely run out of surges (they may run low, but then they sleep). It means keeping around an "old war wound" is a viable option, especially for defenders. But keeping around 3 or 4 old war wounds may be a bad idea...

I'm going to incorporate that into my post above (I was working on it at the same time you were posting).

-- 77IM
77IM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th November 2008, 09:11 PM   #15 (permalink)
has no status.

Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 71
I think this version is pretty playable. But you should probably add some language about what is required to remove a permanent wound/scar - you allude to magical healing (a ritual?) but I'd also suggest maybe going up in level should remove scars. Being me, I'd say it should be something that happens on odd levels: you can remove one wound.
mlangsdorf is offline   Reply With Quote


Tags
system , wound

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Check out our sponsors!

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0