Recent News | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Visit Our Sponsors | | | | Subscribe! | | | | EN World: Your Daily RPG Magazine | | All the latest EN World
official reviews, columns, and subscriber articles here.
Don't have your subscription yet? It's only $3 a month and you can grab
it right
here! |
1st March 2009, 09:56 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| |
is readying his bear army
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
| Generics: Create-An-Attack-Power Here's my idea for a create a power system. Basically you take one of the power skeletons and add/subtract attributes whose points values sum up to a certain amount depending or the type of power.
There are 4 power skeletons. 1 for each attack type. Each attack gains a power source keyword (Martial, Divine,...) and an accesory keyword (Weapon, Implement).
Melee
Standard Action, Melee Weapon
Target: One Creature
Attack: Primary Attribute Modifier (PAM) vs AC
Hit: 1W + PAM damage
Ranged
Standard Action, Ranged Weapon
Target: One Creature
Attack: Primary Attribute Modifier (PAM) vs AC
Hit: 1W + PAM damage
Close
Standard Action, Close Burst 1
Target: Each creature in burst
Attack: Primary Attribute Modifier (PAM) vs AC
Hit: 1W + PAM damage
Area
Standard Action, Area burst 1 within 10 squares
Target: Each creature is burst
Attack: Primary Attribute Modifier (PAM) vs Reflex
Hit: 1d6 + PAM damage
2) Each power type has a different power modifier sum. Power modifiers may be taken more than once and the effects are cummulative.
At-will powers: 1
Encounter powers: 2 in heroic, 5 in paragon, 7 in epic
Daily power: 4 in heroic, 7 in paragon, 9 in epic
Sample Power Modifers
-2: No PAM damage on Hit
-1: Add damage type (fire, necrotic, poison)
-1: Remove Weapon or Implement Keyword
0: Attack targets Fortitude or Will instead of Reflex
0: Ranged 5 instead of Ranged weapon
0: Hit deal 1d6 damage instead of 1W
0: Add damage type (cold, electric, thunder)
1: Blast or Wall instead of burst
1: Hit also pushes the target 1 square
1: Hit also knocks the target prone
1: Hit deals an additional 1W
1: Hit or Miss also causes minor ailment (dazed, slowed, grants combat advantage) until the end of your next turn
1: Hit or Miss causes onging damage 5
1: Hit or Miss grants target -2 penalty to one defense or attack rolls until end of your next turn
1: Hit or Miss grants target -SAM penalty to one defense or attack rolls until end of your next turn
1: Increase damage dice one size
1: Increase burst or area size by 2
1: Increase Range by 5 squares
1: Ailment lasts until save ends instead or end of turn
1: Hit deals Secondary Attribute damage
1: Add damage type (radiant, acid, psychic)
1: Attack is Realible
1: +2 to the attack roll
1: Attack deal half damage on Miss
2: Attack targets Reflex instead of AC
2: Hit or Miss also causes major ailment (stunned, immobilized, blinded) until the end of your next turn
2: Additional 1W attack after primary attack
Of course it is up to the DM the allow the attack for balance or sense purposes (Martial attacks dealing fire damage etc).
__________________ My beard is hairy. |
| |
2nd March 2009, 02:57 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| |
has no status.
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 441
| It's an interesting idea but it certainly needs a lot of work to be able to be used in a game. For example you could have an at-will that gives the target -SAM to AC for a turn - which would be incredibly useful especially at higher levels where SAMs can be +6 or even higher.
I actually had an idea similar to yours once, that had to do with establishing a "damage equivalent" for each effect of a power and then balancing the "Expected damage" against other powers of similar type and level. I never actually finished it up though, but I might as part of the "homebrewing guide" that I'm working on. |
| |
2nd March 2009, 08:01 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| |
Your DM Knows Kung-Fu
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 2,854
| I think you've got a nice start! This is something I've been trying to figure out since I got the 4e books, how to deconstruct the power creation system.
Let's give your system a run-through with a couple powers and see what happens... Scenario #1: Deep Cut (Rogue Attack 5)
Melee power skeleton, 4 pts
(2) Attack targets Reflex (Fortitude) instead of AC
(1) Hit deals an additional 1[W]
(1) Hit or Miss causes ongoing damage 5 (roughly)
Checks out! Scenario #2: Renewing Smite (Paladin Attack 13)
Melee power skeleton, 5 points
(1) Hit deals additional 1[W]
(1) Heal ally 10+Wis It seems like healing 10+Wis for an ally is comparable to "Hit or miss causes 5 ongoing damage", so I'll count it for 1 point
According to your system, Renewing Smite is underpowered any way you slice it. Scenario #3: Death Rend (Ranger 27)
Melee power skeleton, 7 points
(1) Hit deals additional 1[W]
(2) Additional 1[W] attack after primary attack
(1) Hit deals additional 1[W]
(1) I'll say that causing additional damage if both attacks hit is worth 1
(2) Attack causes major ailment (stunned) until end of your next turn
Checks out!  |
| |
2nd March 2009, 04:13 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| |
Arcadian Knight
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 3,348
| Yup just got the urge to go through the powers and cost them out starting with Sure Strike...
I think that checks out too, hehehe.
Last edited by Garthanos; 2nd March 2009 at 04:35 PM..
|
| |
2nd March 2009, 09:41 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| |
Your DM Knows Kung-Fu
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 2,854
| Three more, from each tier of the fighter. Scenario #4: Crack the Shell (Fighter 5)
Melee power skeleton, 4 points
(1) Reliable
(1) Hit deals assidional 1[W]
(1) Target takes ongoing 5 damage
(1) Target takes -2 penalty to one defense (AC)
Checks out! Scenario #5: Exacting Strike (Fighter 17)
Melee power skeleton, 5 points
(3) +2 to the attack roll (total bonus of +6)
(1) Hit deals additional 1[W]
Seems slightly underpowered. Scenario #6: No Mercy (Fighter 29)
Melee power skeleton, 9 points
(1) Reliable
(6) Hit deals additional 1[W] (total of +6[W])
Seems underpowered.
Maybe daily power points for paragon and epic should be reduced one? (ie. Daily Power: 4 heroic, 6 paragon, 8 epic) |
| |
2nd March 2009, 10:31 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| |
is readying his bear army
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
| The system breaks down when to stack too many of the same bonus a lot and notthing else. Certain 1 point power modifiers get weird when you stack them a lot.
Storm of Destruction (fgtr daily 29) has +1W eight times, a bonus attack, and deal half on miss to a total of 11. Reign of Terror (daily 25) is 7.
Don't even get started on the wizard ones.
I need a rule for stacking modifiers.
__________________ My beard is hairy. |
| |
3rd March 2009, 01:18 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| |
The Salamancer
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Western Michigan
Posts: 772
| There's no way to indicate level, either - a level 1 daily and a level 9 daily under this system both have 4 points, despite the power disparity they should have.
__________________ Will Thibault is a winged, feathered serpent rarely found anywhere except in warm, jungle-like regions or flying through the ether. Due to his intelligence and powers he is regarded with awe by the inhabitants of his homelands and is considered to be divine. |
| |
4th March 2009, 11:38 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| |
is readying his bear army
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
| THe power disparity between 1 and 8 is often low. Each power is not pbalanced to each other enough to make the avergae between the level workable. For example most heroic encounters are 2-4 dice with 2-4 bonus effects. They mostly average to 2 points of so.
__________________ My beard is hairy. |
| |
6th March 2009, 12:45 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| |
has no status.
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1
| This is a intriguing thread, and a potential great resource for DMs like me who like to produce homebrew.
It is somehow a functionnal first throw, and has a lot of potential. I'd like to encourage you to polish that little gem of a system further.
Thanks sharing your ideas, this is the reason people like me lurk around the homebrew boards. |
| |
6th March 2009, 07:33 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| |
binding binding binding all the live long day
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,874
| It certainly seems to get things in the right ballpark. I doubt ANY point system is going to entirely fit the whole range of powers in the game, but it is a handy way to check your gut feeling on what is or isn't balanced.
As for low level vs high level, actually if you think about it increasing the level of a power is more of a penalty than it is a benefit. I don't think it really makes sense to factor it in in any way at all. High level powers indeed are more 'powerful', in general, but what level you assign a power to is more about fitting it into the overall set of existing powers than it is a precise statement of how good the power is. There are plenty of examples of 1st level powers that continue to be useful all the way up to 30th level and really aren't especially weaker in the hands of such a character than some of the epic tier powers. |
| |
6th March 2009, 07:47 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| |
Arcadian Knight
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 3,348
| I was just pointing out that the Rangers hunters quarry made the rest of his powers suprisingly more dangerous than they looked... in other wards the context of the class... makes all his stuff more biting. ;-) |
| |
7th March 2009, 01:11 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
| |
has no status.
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 441
| One interesting thing to think about when making a system like this is to decide whether you want to (a) try to create a system that accurately matches the existing powers or (b) try to create a system that creates powers as balanced as possible. For example in the existing system a -SAM to AC is worth the same as a -2 to AC, and based on what I've seen of the powers, that accurately reflects how powers are designed. But SAMs can be significantly higher than 2 - especially in the higher tiers. And multiple attacks also tend to be undervalued by this system, because at high levels you get lots of static modifiers to damage so even a relatively weak secondary can become another opportunity to apply these powers. But of course even in the existing powers, multiple attack powers are often agreed to be superior to single attack powers. So how should the systm reflect this? |
| |
7th March 2009, 03:14 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| |
has no status. How true.
Swedish Murder Machine
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Menominee, MI
Posts: 1,532
| There's some really clever stuff here. I'm gonna have to keep this as a yardstick for any homebrew stuff I work up.
As far as stacking modifiers, could you give some kind of credit based on the tier? For example, at paragon tier, maybe you can choose one modifier and get two points of it for free? 4 points at epic. Just a thought.
__________________ Plotting my next online game. |
| |
7th March 2009, 10:51 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| |
is readying his bear army
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,339
| Well my intent was to make standard powers that are balance to the tier, not to the existing powers.
One new idea was to makes 3 groups of power modifiers.
Group 1 stacks normally because the modifiers stay about the same strength at all levels. Llike ongoing damage 5.
Group 2 stacks normally up to a point, Then the modifier's values drops. This dice and range increases, and bonus artacks.
Group 3 is the opposite of Group 2. The modifier's values imcrease. This is for the ones like, +1W and bonus to attacks.
__________________ My beard is hairy. |
| |
8th March 2009, 04:19 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| |
Arcadian Knight
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 3,348
| This tool goes in to my utility set... |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Check out our sponsors! |
| | | | | | | |