Go Back   EN World D&D / RPG News > D&D 4th Edition Discussion > D&D 4th Edition Rules

D&D 4th Edition Rules Ask questions about 4th-Edition rules and the like in here. General discussion about 4E or any other game belongs in General RPG Discussion, above.

 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15th March 2009, 09:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Artoomis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,039
Artoomis Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Ignore cover for melee??

There are a few feats or powers (and maybe items?) to ignore all but total cover and concealment for ranged attacks, but what about melee attacks? Is there anything?

Thanks for your help!
__________________
Forward! We've got them right where they want us!
Yes, there can be more than one right answer to a rules question! It can be an exercise in futility to attempt to apply a great deal of precision to an imprecise set of rules.
Artoomis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2009, 10:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
RPG Tinkerer
 
keterys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 4,526
keterys Gnoll Huntmaster (Lvl 5)
Cover for melee is actually very rare. Concealment, of course, is pretty common... Blind Fight in epic basically removes most concealment for melee purposes, but I'm not sure about anything ealier.
keterys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2009, 10:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Artoomis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,039
Artoomis Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by keterys View Post
Cover for melee is actually very rare. Concealment, of course, is pretty common... Blind Fight in epic basically removes most concealment for melee purposes, but I'm not sure about anything ealier.
Blind-Fight is good, but not what I had in mind.

Cover for reach weapons can be fairly common. I'd like something like Hunter's Aim be avialable for melee weapons.
__________________
Forward! We've got them right where they want us!
Yes, there can be more than one right answer to a rules question! It can be an exercise in futility to attempt to apply a great deal of precision to an imprecise set of rules.
Artoomis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2009, 05:53 AM   #4 (permalink)
with all due respect
 
Mort_Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,366
Mort_Q Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Hawk's Talon, Ranger 7

Not much else.
Mort_Q is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2009, 07:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Artoomis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,039
Artoomis Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mort_Q View Post
Hawk's Talon, Ranger 7

Not much else.
Thanks, I missed that one. It does not quite work for me, but it (or Hunter's Aim) can be a model for a new feat, perhaps.

Unless there is something in PHB2, I'll need to get my DM to let me take me a custom feat. It's part of what I used to do with this character in 3.5e, and we are trying to capture the "feel" of those characters in converting them over, as much as we can, anyway. I had much fun it telling the DM that cover did not apply to my attacks - and doing it over and over...

Of course I'll need to limit it to only the -2 for cover/concealment. That seems obvious given the other examples out there for ranged attacks. I just hope I don't end up needing two feats to get it - one to multiclass to get the prerequisite for the feat I want.
__________________
Forward! We've got them right where they want us!
Yes, there can be more than one right answer to a rules question! It can be an exercise in futility to attempt to apply a great deal of precision to an imprecise set of rules.

Last edited by Artoomis; 16th March 2009 at 07:12 AM..
Artoomis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2009, 12:13 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Bagpuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wirral, UK
Posts: 3,880
Bagpuss Goblin Sharpshooter (Lvl 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artoomis View Post
There are a few feats or powers (and maybe items?) to ignore all but total cover and concealment for ranged attacks, but what about melee attacks?
Hunter’s Aim works equally well for melee but only works with cover and concealment, not superior cover and only for Rangers obviously. I'd probably just work from Point Blank Shot, and have an equivalent Paragon Tier feat but for Melee.
__________________

My RPG Stuff - Free D20 Modern GM's Screen available.
Wolfgang Baur I cheated your room.
Bagpuss is offline   Reply With Quote


Bookmarks

Tags
cover, ignore, melee??

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


And yet another word from our sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors
Visit Our Sponsors... Again
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:30 AM.


Site Contents © 2008 ENWorld
PHP Ajax Multimedia Web Framework © 2008 Digital Media Graphix
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

"Vault Data" powered by VaultWiki v2.5.1.
Copyright © 2008 - 2009, Cracked Egg Studios.