D&D 4th Edition RulesAsk questions about 4th-Edition rules and the like in here. General discussion about 4E or any other game belongs in General RPG Discussion, above.
Prerequisite: 11th level, artificer, healing infusion class feature
Benefit: When your resistive formula grants temporary hit points to you or an ally, that character can grant an equal number of temporary hit points to one ally within 5 squares of him or her.
Eberron Player's Guide, Page 45
Healing Infusion: Resistive Formula (Artificer Feature) Encounter (Special) * Arcane Minor Action Close burst 5 Target: You or one ally in burst Effect: The target gains a +1 power bonus to AC until the end of the encounter, and you expend an infusion crafted with your Healing Infusion class feature. The target can end the bonus as a free action to gain temporary hit points equal to its healing surge value + your Constitution modifier.
Level 11: Burst 10 and add twice your CON mod.
Level 21: Burst 15 and add 3 times your CON mod. Special: You can use two Healing Infusion powers per encounter, but only one per round. At 16th level, you can use three Healing Infusion powers per encounter, but only one per round.
Is it just me, or is this...utterly ridiculous? It grants 2 party members more than HS Value in temporary hit points. You can do this twice per encounter. What were they thinking?
They also didn't have temp hp go away after 5 minutes (ie, if people avoid short resting). And made the battlerager. I think they've got a blind spot for temp hp.
They also didn't have temp hp go away after 5 minutes (ie, if people avoid short resting). And made the battlerager. I think they've got a blind spot for temp hp.
Do any?
The PHB says:
Quote:
Last until You Rest: Your temporary hit points last until they’re reduced to 0 by damage or until you take a rest.
Any temp HP that only lasted 5 min wouldnt be as good as the base temp HP presented in the PHB.
The PHB does say that you have to "rest" during a short rest, but it doesn't say you have to stop and do absolutely nothing. The text is vague enough that you could probably take a short rest while walking through a dungeon as long as you aren't hustling. Given that, just about the only thing players can reliably do to prevent a short rest is find another fight before 5 minutes are up, but a) I find that unlikely and b) the missing encounter powers are a pretty fair trade for keeping their temp. hit points and c) you can almost always add a five minute long hallway.
On the other hand, if the party tries to let some people take a short rest while others keep their temps, what are they going to do? Jog around to keep from resting? I would say something like, "Your jog is very invigorating and strangely... resting. You've taken a short rest and your temps are gone." If they try to spar to keep on their toes, then hitting each other used up the temps.
Now, Enhanced Resistive Formula is awesome, but it takes some forethought and planning to keep those temps from going to waste.
ETA: It's awesome with a ranger beast companion. Check out how big their surge value is by paragon!
__________________ "In Life's name and for Its sake, I advise you I am here on the business of the Powers That Be! Your actions toward me, and through me, toward Them, will determine the continuation or revocation of your present status. Be warned by me and desist!" --Wizards at War, Diane Duane
Is it just me, or is this...utterly ridiculous? It grants 2 party members more than HS Value in temporary hit points. You can do this twice per encounter. What were they thinking?
Unlike "real" healing, temporary hit points still don't stack; so while this is quite attractive, there's limits to its use. Also, compared to other healing powers, this power heals a relatively small amount, and its risky in the sense that it costs healing surges even when the temporary hitpoints come to nothing. For that matter, it costs a feat to be able to do this in the first place. Then, whereas most healers can very efficiently heal a party in one (or several) short rests, this artificer build is very bad at that, granting almost no bonuses to such healing.
This looks quite good, but I certainly don't think it looks "utterly ridiculous". I mean, other leaders get other very solid damage-reducing/healing abilities, so this seems par for the course. Even with this, I expect the artificer is still a ways behind the cleric in terms of healing.
__________________
4e balanced random loot system
- Think item wishlists are devilspawn?
- Dislike the impact of a few bad item picks by the DM on the party?
- Or find it ludicrous that PC's constantly just "happen" to find magic items tailored to their needs?
Try: A simpler treasure system for (mostly) random loot.
3.5 death&dying variant
- Tired of players that won't cure their mortally wounded allies 'cause "he's only at -2"?
- Tired of a dying mechanic which uses anachronistic d10's?
- Tired of a dying mechanic which never kicks into action for high level characters, which tend to go from alive and kicking to instant death before anyone can intervene?
- Tired of horribly complex house rules?
Try: Death & Dying - a better (and simple!) system
A lot of it depends on the campaign and how many fights you're likely to see in one day. One of the strong points of the artificer healing is that you can move surges around, so it's no longer about one person's surges running out. You can very, very freely spend surges as a group.
So a fun thing you can do... say you have a 12th level group with a warden with 112 hp and a wizard with 68 hp. After a short rest you use a single resistive formula on the warden, giving him 38 temp hp... and giving the wizard 38 temp hp. More than the wizard's bloodied value, and equivalent to a surge + 3d6 from a tactical warlord. Hardly poor value.
Then the warden and wizard do calisthenics, not resting, while you do a short rest to get the formula back. Cost: 1 surge from anyone, and _someone_ will have an extra surge, gain: 76 hp of ablative that will likely turn the next combat into a relative cakewalk. If you've got one or two more allies, repeat before resting and use the barbarian's surge value to give the rogue ridiculous temp hp, or whatever.
Just rule that if one person rests, the entire group is considered to rest (calisthenics are insufficient to avoid a short rest). Even without the feat, an artificer could "pre-buff" a party to 125% normal hp (using temporary hp) by resting several times, but I'd consider that cheese and not what the designers intended. I'd allow an artificer with this feat to "pre-buff" up to 4 party members, but I'd also consider his infusions expended for the next encounter.
As long as the players don't try to exploit the rules, I think the ability is fine. It's a lot of temps, but temps are tricky to work with. Any that don't get used by the end of an encounter are wasted.
I actually think the feat could encourage some interesting tactics, like buffing the Warden with a Resistive at the beginning of the encounter so that he can assist allies (by granting temps) in case the artificer becomes dazed/stunned and cannot heal.
Just rule that if one person rests, the entire group is considered to rest
One possible solution, though not one that matters for games like Living Forgotten Realms.
Quote:
but I'd consider that cheese and not what the designers intended.
Maybe. Much like I'm sure they didn't intend for pre-errata battleragers to be able to hit a target multiple times with invigorating powers then go into the next combat with a crazy amount of stacked temp hp.
Quote:
As long as the players don't try to exploit the rules, I think the ability is fine. It's a lot of temps, but temps are tricky to work with. Any that don't get used by the end of an encounter are wasted.
True, you probably want to focus on defenders and people who burn temp hp to power abilities like Bloodclaw, if you're not allowed to just put it on everyone ahead of time.
FWIW, I agree with keterys and have already houseruled my game so that temp HPs, like every other effect, only last 5 minutes.
That's certainly sounds reasonable to me. There's quite a few temp.hp sources that this affects, and most of em seem more reasonable for the change. FWIW, my earlier combat about the balance of Resistive formula assumed usage during combat.
I think it's lame to "force" short rests, and there's something wrong with mechanics that encourage DM to do so. I mean, a short rest is supposed to be a good thing... right?
__________________
4e balanced random loot system
- Think item wishlists are devilspawn?
- Dislike the impact of a few bad item picks by the DM on the party?
- Or find it ludicrous that PC's constantly just "happen" to find magic items tailored to their needs?
Try: A simpler treasure system for (mostly) random loot.
3.5 death&dying variant
- Tired of players that won't cure their mortally wounded allies 'cause "he's only at -2"?
- Tired of a dying mechanic which uses anachronistic d10's?
- Tired of a dying mechanic which never kicks into action for high level characters, which tend to go from alive and kicking to instant death before anyone can intervene?
- Tired of horribly complex house rules?
Try: Death & Dying - a better (and simple!) system
That's certainly sounds reasonable to me. There's quite a few temp.hp sources that this affects, and most of em seem more reasonable for the change. FWIW, my earlier combat about the balance of Resistive formula assumed usage during combat.
I think it's lame to "force" short rests, and there's something wrong with mechanics that encourage DM to do so. I mean, a short rest is supposed to be a good thing... right?
Just say that the temp hp goes away after 5 minutes or after a short rest. That way you aren't forcing anybody to take a short rest.
We had this short rest thing going on in the last campaign I was in. Our DM had infected us all with a disease, and every time you took a rest, you had to make your endurance check to progress on the disease track. The Avenger in the party didn't take a rest all day. While we rested, he searched bodies, rooms, whatever, and the DM let it slide. Those of us with a less. . .metagamey outlook, took our rests as usual. My Illusionist died of a disease during a short rest.
I guess I think it is kind of cheesy metagaming madness that would posess you to *not* take a rest when everyone else is. Doing jumping jacks while everyone else is winding down from the battle? Really? As such, I think this feat is just right, use it when you think it will be useful and you can get your investment's worth. I certainly don't feel it is OP.
If you read it a VERY narrow and specific way and ignore basically every single implication in the text, then what the feat actually does is takes the temp hp from one person and grant them to another. This puts it much more in line with many other feats as in "crappy"
__________________ Garthanos- fantastic awesome guy of June/09
Sporemine- fantastic awesome guy of July/09
Michaelsomething- fantastic awesome guy of August/09
Thaumaturge- fantastic awesome guy of September/09
Zinovia- fantastic awesome guy of October/09
Wow, not only do I think that is the wrong interpretation because its *wrong*, but I think that since the default power already does that, the feat can't work that way.
The feat says you can grant an equal number of temp HP to another ally, not half, or a portion, but an equal number. Meaning that you use the power as is, and another nearby ally gets an equal number of temp HP.
Second, since the Artificers gets these powers by having surges donated to him, he is already swapping temp HP's around. If you decided that this power worked by moving temp HP between players, then the feat does absolutely nothing. Not crappy, useless.
Your disease experience reminds me of the movie Crank.
Clearly, someone should have explained to him that all the crazy stuff he was doing instead of resting was cheesy or cheating
Or, the DM should have taken the hint and fixed the mechanic, if that wasn't what he wanted. Which wouldn't have been that hard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbrrd
Just say that the temp hp goes away after 5 minutes or after a short rest. That way you aren't forcing anybody to take a short rest.
Yeah, that's a good idea. +added to my shortlist of houserules to consider ;-).
<rant directed at various misguided game effect designers, not you guys>The whole game is set up to encourage players to think tactically within the framework of the effects that are ongoing and available. If you don't want player choice to impact an effect... well... *drumroll* don't make the effect dependent on player choice. It disrupts the game!</rant>
__________________
4e balanced random loot system
- Think item wishlists are devilspawn?
- Dislike the impact of a few bad item picks by the DM on the party?
- Or find it ludicrous that PC's constantly just "happen" to find magic items tailored to their needs?
Try: A simpler treasure system for (mostly) random loot.
3.5 death&dying variant
- Tired of players that won't cure their mortally wounded allies 'cause "he's only at -2"?
- Tired of a dying mechanic which uses anachronistic d10's?
- Tired of a dying mechanic which never kicks into action for high level characters, which tend to go from alive and kicking to instant death before anyone can intervene?
- Tired of horribly complex house rules?
Try: Death & Dying - a better (and simple!) system
Or, the DM should have taken the hint and fixed the mechanic, if that wasn't what he wanted. Which wouldn't have been that hard.
Oh, agreed. My sarcasm was perhaps not clear enough Having a disease, especially one that can outright kill you, potentially better or worsen every time you take a short rest is ludicrous.
I could totally see a curse or effect that would steal your encounter powers triggering on short rests, but that's within the bounds of the short rest framework.
Linear Mode
And yet another word from our sponsors
