General RPG DiscussionDiscussion of all RPGs and non-system-specific topics. DM/GM/player issues, settings, etc. Rules discussion belongs in one the forums below.
The last time I checked the KQ forums Mr. Bauer looks to be moving away from supporting D&D 4e. Since the GSL would prevent him from offering both OGL and GSL material together, and since most of his audience wants support of D&D 3.5 and Pathfinder, I doubt he will be supporting D&D 4e any time soon. Well, except for the one Open Design project that was patron sponsored for 4e.
__________________ Stephen J. Miller
Co-author of Gaslight: Victorian Fantasy RPG, from Battlefield Press!
Available now at RPGnow.com
Ancient Gamer and Curmudgeon
You too can be an Ancient Gamer and Curmudgeon! Ancient Gamer Store
I hope is stays 3e or pathfinder. The GSL is very unfriendly and in the end i think would hurt him.
__________________ Remember kids whisky will not put out flaming mages ,but it will confuse the deathknight
"The Soul of D&D? It's rolling a natural 20 when you're down to 3 hit points and the cleric's on the floor and you're staring that sunnavabitch bugbear right in his bloodshot eye and holding the line just long enough to let the wizard unleash a fireball at the guards who are on their way, because they're all that stands between you, the Foozle and Glory." - WizarDru
Thank you Gary Gygax, for everything.
"Rock on, Paizo, for you rock mightily".- dragonlordofpoondari
I've been given a semi-regular feature in the magazine, and he hasn't said anything to me about making it 4E compatible. I'm pretty sure the answer is no.
__________________ Darrin Drader
Freelance Writer/Game Designer
Previously posting as Whisperfoot
I fully understand why Wolf would choose to go that route, given some of the ugly provisions of the GSL. But from a purely personal perspective, I have to say I'm disappointed. I really enjoyed the one bit of work I did for KQ, and I was really hoping to be able to do more. (Plus, I just loved the mag as a fan, not just as a writer.)
But as I said, I get why he'd choose not to.
__________________ Ari Marmell
aka
Mouseferatu
--Rodent of the Dark
Oh, I'm allowed to, absolutely. But the simple, brutal truth is, I don't want to. I find designing for 4E to be much more enjoyable, and much more to my taste, under something like 85% of circumstances, if not more. (It's the only reason I haven't been pestering Paizo for work.)
If I ever have a large gap in my schedule where I can't find any 4E work (or fiction work), I'm not saying I'll never go back to 3.5 design no matter what--but I don't think it likely, and it's not something I especially want to do.
__________________ Ari Marmell
aka
Mouseferatu
--Rodent of the Dark
Oh, I'm allowed to, absolutely. But the simple, brutal truth is, I don't want to. I find designing for 4E to be much more enjoyable, and much more to my taste, under something like 85% of circumstances, if not more. (It's the only reason I haven't been pestering Paizo for work.)
If I ever have a large gap in my schedule where I can't find any 4E work (or fiction work), I'm not saying I'll never go back to 3.5 design no matter what--but I don't think it likely, and it's not something I especially want to do.
I actually have exactly the same perspective, only in reverse. I recently withdrew a 4th edition proposal from a publisher that was tentatively going to move forward with it because I have no interest in designing for that game. At least not at this time. If the Pathfinder RPG does well enough, probably not ever. 4E leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
__________________ Darrin Drader
Freelance Writer/Game Designer
Previously posting as Whisperfoot
I actually have exactly the same perspective, only in reverse. I recently withdrew a 4th edition proposal from a publisher that was tentatively going to move forward with it because I have no interest in designing for that game. At least not at this time. If the Pathfinder RPG does well enough, probably not ever. 4E leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Is that freelancing position still open? Because I'll take it!
Is that freelancing position still open? Because I'll take it!
It wasn't a position per se, it was more of an opportunity, so I made a pitch, and they liked it. Then the GSL hit, and I took the opportunity to go deeper into the core books, and I discovered that I really, really didn't like this version of the game. The publisher understood how I felt and didn't fault me for it. I'd go into more details, but I'd rather keep the specifics between me and the publisher.
__________________ Darrin Drader
Freelance Writer/Game Designer
Previously posting as Whisperfoot
Yes, I'm working up a 4E patron project right now, called Wrath of the River King. That's the only 4E project on my calendar.
I'd be happy to offer 4E content for KQ (any new system needs a lot of support articles), and I'm enjoying designing for the new system.
But there's two reasons to hold off. First, the GSL makes it pretty much impossible to support 4E in Kobold Quarterly under that license. I find this disappointing, but it did make the decision very easy.
And second, there's been quite limited reader support for it. The 3E fans has been vocal in their support for KQ, and have subscribed in good numbers. The 4E fans .... haven't really spoken up or subscribed.
So, I'll be offering limited material useful for 4E in issue #6, without the GSL. I had hoped that the new edition would not split the gaming public, but it seems clear that a large minority of players are sticking with 3E. And many of them are KQ subscribers.
4E has rituals, use them, they're magic; Want to see the greatest thing you will ever see? then click; You can use “Earth” as a D&D setting; Origins of The Rouse; (look for it) The Rouse responds; (look for it) One can appreciate both old and new D&D.
Oh, I'm allowed to, absolutely. But the simple, brutal truth is, I don't want to. I find designing for 4E to be much more enjoyable, and much more to my taste, under something like 85% of circumstances, if not more. (It's the only reason I haven't been pestering Paizo for work.)
If I ever have a large gap in my schedule where I can't find any 4E work (or fiction work), I'm not saying I'll never go back to 3.5 design no matter what--but I don't think it likely, and it's not something I especially want to do.
Well, you are the one who said (if I'm remembering correct) that the thought of running combat made in v.3.5 after playing 4e made you want to throw up, so your answer didn't surprise me at all.
__________________ Wolfspider
Founder of BADD - Bothered About Disposable Dragons
"Provide evidence of this claim, or retract it because it's a dishonest statement." -- Mourn, laying down the law
"The sins of the previous edition don't excuse the sins of the next." -- Kamikaze Midget, giving words to my thoughts
Well, you are the one who said (if I'm remembering correct) that the thought of running combat made in v.3.5 after playing 4e made you want to throw up, so your answer didn't surprise me at all.
Um, I don't believe I ever said anything quite like that.
I certainly did say that I wouldn't want to go back to 3.5 combat, but the idea doesn't make me nauseous at all. It's just unappealing.
__________________ Ari Marmell
aka
Mouseferatu
--Rodent of the Dark
Oh, I'm allowed to, absolutely. But the simple, brutal truth is, I don't want to. I find designing for 4E to be much more enjoyable, and much more to my taste, under something like 85% of circumstances, if not more. (It's the only reason I haven't been pestering Paizo for work.)
If I ever have a large gap in my schedule where I can't find any 4E work (or fiction work), I'm not saying I'll never go back to 3.5 design no matter what--but I don't think it likely, and it's not something I especially want to do.
Honestly, I don't know. Obviously, the old Lion's Den stuff has to come down (or at least change) when the D20 License ends. Beyond that? C.A. and I haven't fully decided what's next for LDP.
__________________ Ari Marmell
aka
Mouseferatu
--Rodent of the Dark