General RPG DiscussionDiscussion of all RPGs and non-system-specific topics. DM/GM/player issues, settings, etc. Rules discussion belongs in one the forums below.
I may have been misreading but isn't it what the Lawyers and Scott's boss' can do with Scott's and Co.'s suggestions?
To clarify, I meant you as in the whole of WotC. Just a hunch, but I suspect that if it were entirely up to Scott (and Slavicsek, and the other people within the hierarchy who are brave enough to come forward and put a public face on the corporation), we'd probably still have the OGL for 4th edition.
__________________ Darrin Drader
Freelance Writer/Game Designer
Previously posting as Whisperfoot
To clarify, I meant you as in the whole of WotC. Just a hunch, but I suspect that if it were entirely up to Scott (and Slavicsek, and the other people within the hierarchy who are brave enough to come forward and put a public face on the corporation), we'd probably still have the OGL for 4th edition.
Cool
*bounces off back to the Hive*
__________________ Ginnel
"Someone on the internet is wrong!"
Shabe on sharing loot
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shabe
Of course you may be talking about all of the above in character where all the characters in the party count every single coin and keep track of it individually and all know the exact price of items, all can divide big numbers in their heads and all carry around a handy set of dice with them for when the roll off occurs, then of course you are fine, else well done you've taken some of the r out or rpg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ginnel
If you want to create something different do it.
All elves are fat and prone to flatulence and their nickname is Gary.
Bang I've just changed my world do the same with yours.
The "poll's level of confidence" is a technical issue important to statisticians, but of questionable relevance to how we here should view the results in this context. Our level of confidence in the poll is relevant, but not technically defined.
Folks, our polls are not scientific. They are a toy. Please don't argue about them like this.
Look, my initial post was trying to correct a very bad misapprehension (that 900 votes in a poll is a low number), in the field for which I'm a professional teacher. Are you saying as a mod that that's prohibited? Because I can't tell if you're talking as moderator or participant.
__________________ ADVANCED DUNGEONS &DRAGONS is first and foremost a game for the fun and enjoyment of those who seek to use imagination and creativity. This is not to say that where it does not interfere with the flow of the game that the highest degree of realism hasn‘t been attempted, but neither is a serious approach to play discouraged. (1E DMG p. 9)
Here's the reason: protracted hijacking with continuing arguments and edition rivalry between 4E and Paizo.
With that caveat, if someone decided to start a new thread about the revision to the GSL, it will stay open so long as everyone can stay focused on the topic at hand. There won't be any warnings in the new thread. Attempts to hijack it into an edition war will result in an extended vacation from the boards while the guilty parties can repeatedly access the rules and think about how they can avoid a further hiatus.
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/238508-wizards-coast-revise-d-d-4th-edition-4e-gaming-system-license-system-reference-document.html
Linear Mode
And yet another word from our sponsors
