| |
11th August 2008, 10:28 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 155
| WotC Announces Forthcoming Revised GSL http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/welcome
New FAQ and SRD will be posted when the revised GSL is available.
No ETA at this point. It will be available very soon.
__________________ Linae Foster
Free Range Gamer |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:30 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,730
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lurkinglidda | Good news, thanks for the heads up Linae. |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:35 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Familiar Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,917
| It seems that the Public Relations department has finaly convinced Legal that any benefits that the GSL may provide are being overwhelmed by negative publicity. That, plus I think the staff manning the booth a Gen Con demanded this announcement before they had to deal with the issue all con long (Disclaimer: just my observation and in no way is based on any knowlege of the actual company politics).
__________________ Brain: Come Pinky! We must prepare for tomorrow night.
Pinky: Why? What are we going to do tomorrow night?
Brain: The same thing we do every night....TRY TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD! |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:40 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 155
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown Jenkin It seems that the Public Relations department has finaly convinced Legal that any benefits that the GSL may provide are being overwhelmed by negative publicity. That, plus I think the staff manning the booth a Gen Con demanded this announcement before they had to deal with the issue all con long (Disclaimer: just my observation and in no way is based on any knowlege of the actual company politics). | Actually, Scott and yours truly pushed for this possible CLM. We intended to have everything buttoned up by GenCon. Realizing that was not going to happen I requested we put up the announcement.
__________________ Linae Foster
Free Range Gamer |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:41 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 125
| GREAT NEWS! I hope some of the more vocal 3PPs can now jump on board and support 4E (i.e. Necromancer Games). This is a good day indeed . . . |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:41 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | blargney the minute's son
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 6,108
| Interesting! What general direction are the changes going? Is the hope for them to be easier for 3rd parties to access?
__________________ Red Hot Swing
"In Inspired Sarlona, nightmares have you!" -Klaus |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:41 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | The Gnome King
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: PHB2
Posts: 11,036
| Quote:
“We recognize the important role third party publishing support plays in the success of the 4th Edition of Dungeons & Dragons. We have listened to the community and our valued colleagues and have taken their concerns and recommendations to heart. Our commitment to the health of the industry and hobby gaming lifestyle is reflected in the revisions to the Game System License.”
--Linae Foster D&D Licensing Manager
While the delivery date is not yet firmly established, the revised documents will be available in the very near future.
The new fan site policy, to be made public at a later date, will be posted upon completion.
| Cautiously optimistic here. I want my Folio of Fiends from Necromancer, I want my 4E Freeport Companion, I want more great products that make my group able to play 4E (with WotC books) in a way that works better for us. |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:43 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 150
| For better or worse, Wotc is starting to resemble TSR more and more. |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:47 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Familiar Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,917
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lurkinglidda Actually, Scott and yours truly pushed for this possible CLM. We intended to have everything buttoned up by GenCon. Realizing that was not going to happen I requested we put up the announcement. | Well if you guys pushed for it hopefully this is good news and not a further tightening of the contract.
__________________ Brain: Come Pinky! We must prepare for tomorrow night.
Pinky: Why? What are we going to do tomorrow night?
Brain: The same thing we do every night....TRY TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD! |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:51 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Community Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Coshocton, OH USA
Posts: 4,955
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lurkinglidda Actually, Scott and yours truly pushed for this possible CLM. We intended to have everything buttoned up by GenCon. Realizing that was not going to happen I requested we put up the announcement. |
Linae, glad to hear the news! As one of the bigger 3PPP to sign the GSL I'd love to see a cure period in place, preferably one of 30 days length or greater. It would help me breath easier knowing that if I make a boneheaded mistake that I didn't catch, I would have some time to correct that mistake before being in breach of the license.
I'm very glad to hear this and look forward to additional details.
joe b. |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:52 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 155
| Quote:
Originally Posted by blargney the second What general direction are the changes going? | Is "opener" a word? Quote: |
Is the hope for them to be easier for 3rd parties to access?
| That's the hope. 
__________________ Linae Foster
Free Range Gamer |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:52 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | non sequitur
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: East Peoria, IL
Posts: 718
| Excellent news! I've got high hopes for this.
__________________ --Terwox Books used last session DM'ing: 4E PHB, MM. Playing: Wraith: the Oblivion
Murmuur smiled sadly. "We are forever lost, Ahma. Do you not yet understand?" Dream-Not-Dream: Iterating. A new SH for a new take on a very strange game. Updated 6-14-08. |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:53 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,608
| Here's hoping that the revised license deals with the reprinting of monster stat blocks in 3rd party adventures. I totally understand why WOTC didn't want to make this possible, but its just so darn useful that I don't think I'd ever have much interest in buying an adventure that didn't have the relevant stat blocks right on the page.
Other than that, I'm probably going to ignore the issue and block everyone involved in more drama. |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:55 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 295
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lurkinglidda Actually, Scott and yours truly pushed for this possible CLM. We intended to have everything buttoned up by GenCon. Realizing that was not going to happen I requested we put up the announcement. | Any chance that 3pps can create a single product line for both the OGL and the GSL? If so, then I would be more interested.
Wyrmshadows
__________________ "... I seek not death. It may be the blackness averred by the Nemedian skeptics, or Crom's realm of ice and cloud, or the snowy plains and vaunted halls of Valhalla. I do not know, nor do I care. Let me live while I live, let me know the riches of red meat and stinging wine on the palate, the hot embrace of white arms, the mad exultation of battle when the blue blades flame and crimson, and I am content. Let teachers and priests and philosophers brood over questions of reality and illusion. I know this: if life is illusion, then I am no less an illusion, and being thus, the illusion is real to me. I live, I burn with life, I love, I slay, and I am content." - Conan |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:58 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 5,169
| Good for WotC. It's nice when people, or corporate entities, learn from their mistakes and adapt. |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:58 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | The EN World kitten
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: eastern United States
Posts: 6,754
| Very interesting! I didn't think WotC would actually do it.
I think the most important change to make, however, is to nix the policy regarding WotC's ability to revise the GSL at will and third-parties must comply with whatever the newest version is. So long as that's in there, any other changes, no matter how beneficial, could vanish at any time.
Beyond that, it'd be nice to see the removal of restrictions on publishing OGL content, of the "pay WotC's legal fees" clause, and of the various bindings that survive the termination of the license.
__________________ Need an informed review of a product? No problem! Check out my RPGnow Staff Reviews! |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:58 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Familiar Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,917
| Don't think they will do it but I would like to see companies still be able to sell old OGL products from the same line as converted products so that we don't lose lots of valuable products forever.
__________________ Brain: Come Pinky! We must prepare for tomorrow night.
Pinky: Why? What are we going to do tomorrow night?
Brain: The same thing we do every night....TRY TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD! |
| |
11th August 2008, 10:58 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 427
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown Jenkin It seems that the Public Relations department has finaly convinced Legal that any benefits that the GSL may provide are being overwhelmed by negative publicity. That, plus I think the staff manning the booth a Gen Con demanded this announcement before they had to deal with the issue all con long (Disclaimer: just my observation and in no way is based on any knowlege of the actual company politics). | 2nd post and we have a thread winner!
But let's wait and see just what changes get made:
1) At will termination clause?
2) Absolute termination of content when termination occurs?
3) Can't use OGL and GSL?
Let's wait and see. I think that this move to adjust the language, we'll see how much of an actual change there is, is indicative of how well 4e is _not_ doing. Seems 4e, at the least, wouldn't mind some help from 3PP. If 4e were kicking and taking no prisoners, I doubt we'd see this development. Its finger in the dike time! |
| |
11th August 2008, 11:01 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | King of the Crosstrade
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Fortune's Wheel, Lady's Ward, Sigil
Posts: 4,274
| One can only wonder though if they've already soured the pot by first delaying and then putting out the initial -horrible- GSL? Whatever this ends up being, it might be too little, far too late.
[gleeful speculation and rumor-mongering]
And speculate as you like if it might be a late attempt to head off OGL alternatives to 4e, especially if sales thus far for 4e have been good but not up to what Hasbro expected given the investment in the edition change and its associated digital products.
[/gleeful speculation and rumor-mongering] |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | And yet another word from our sponsors | | | | | | | | | | Visit Our Sponsors | | | | Community Supporter Subscriptions | LATEST EXCLUSIVE CONTENT FOR SUBSCRIBERS | Visit Our Sponsors... Again | | | | |