General RPG DiscussionDiscussion of all RPGs and non-system-specific topics. DM/GM/player issues, settings, etc. Rules discussion belongs in one the forums below.
Gamers Online Now: 684
107 members and 577 guests
Most users ever online was 4,029, 8th April 2009 at 05:04 PM.
Ok this is my very first adventure review. To be totally honest I am a bit unsure how to review a adventure with out spoiling to much, while still giving you enough information to purchase it if you... [Read More]
The fantasy role-playing game Dragon Warriors has a healthy following and the Lands of Legend have been around for many years; as such there are a lot of stories to tell from around this vast... [Read More]
This is the seocnd issue of Ordo Draconis, a fan-made ezine (fanzine) for the recently re-released Dragon Warriors RPG. Spanning over twice the pagecount of Issue 1 (released in September 2009), it... [Read More]
The campaign world doesn't need codified physics laws for everything that takes place, because there is magic. What it does need is an explanation for things that happen that the world's inhabitants can relate to, even if that means simply magic or " by the will of the gods". The imaginary people of a fantasy world need to be grounded in some form of "reality" that has meaning to them even if its very different from our own.
I agree, and most of the powers that have been discussed here show how some people are providing that "reality" to them. Some others just want to dismiss the "interpretation" of the power and say "hogwash" it must be magic because X, Y, Z, etc...
The fact that some are still able to provide a "realistic" interpretation to those powers that are not inherently magical for their campaign, seems to show that it can be done. If some refuse to see it as anything but magic is not a problem with the system, it is a problem with narrow interpretation.
Well, why not Mr. Smartypants? Do you have a better explanation, or rationalization, as the case may be?
Your explanation does not model well what actually happens in the rules as well as the jokey explanation. The DM isn't deciding; the reaction of the creatures isn't dependent upon their nature and the situation. These two factors alone make the jokey explanation match better with actual rules/gameplay than one that adds (essentially) additional restrictions in order to make sense within the rules paradigm.
RC
__________________ [A]ny good dungeon will have undiscovered treasures in areas that have been explored by the players, simply because it is impossible to expect that they will find every one of them.
- Module B1, Page 24
RCFG - My free mostly-OGC OGL game! RCFG is intended to be a fusion between OS & NS playstyles, giving the advantages of SRD-based gaming coupled with quick character and adventure generation and an Old School feel. BETA PLAYTEST NOW AVAILABLE! First Review!
Every class has abilities that are most easily explained by saying " a wizard did it". "Narrative control" would not be an acceptable explanation to an onlooker who witnessed such a power in action.
But that's not what he would see, either.
He would see one of the various ways to "flavor" the "Come and Get It" ability:
- 2 Goblins sit on a tree. The Fighter runs forward, kicks the tree stump, the goblins fall, catching their fall with an elegant move, that brings them right where the fighter is now standing again.
- 5 Zombies surround the party. One seems to be eying for the Wizard, but the Fighter calls out: "Come here, you lifeless pieces of flesh! I will take you down, and if it's the last thing I gonna do!" The Zombie are distracted by the noise and forgets about the Wizard, but are even more determined to get this clearly living and promising thing amongst them - the fighter.
- The Archmage and his bodyguard are standing close to the Fighter. The last spell seemed to have hit him harder then expected. Certain of his victory, the Archmage moves closer. "You are pathetic. You might have had enough power to hurt my youngest students, but you are no match for a real wizard", he says, as he prepares a spell.Only through the body guards quick reaction as the Fighter moves his sword can the archmage avoid his decapitation, but both take some part of the blow. "I haven't even started yet!" screams the fighter.
If the Swordmage had a "Come and Get it" like power, it would look very different. For example, he might swing a lasso from magical energy, or create a whirlwind.
In the first scenario, the in-game-world onlooker doesn't see anything magical. The end result of whatever it sees is that a few enemies end up surrounding the Fighter and he swings at them. But the method by which they got there are entirely mundane. They stumbled into his direction, the fighter tricked them, whatever. He, of course, doesn't see "narrative control" exercised, since he is part of the narrative that is being controlled.
Thoughts of the Arch Chancellor - My weblog on EN World - containing game related material, like: house rules, design theories, reviews, play reports, adventure ideas
Secret Member of <Think we would just hide our secret with a spoiler tag, eh?>
The fact that some are still able to provide a "realistic" interpretation to those powers that are not inherently magical for their campaign, seems to show that it can be done. If some refuse to see it as anything but magic is not a problem with the system, it is a problem with narrow interpretation.
Excepting, of course, that the other possibility is that the "realistic" interpretation to those powers is not, in fact, a realistic interpretation given the nature of the powers in question.
If Power 1 has qualities A, B, C, and D, and I can provide a realistic interpretation provided I ignore quality D, or quality C (so that I have provided a realistic interpretation of a power with qualities A, B, and C and/or for a power with qualities A, B, and D), I still have not provided a realistic interpretation for Power 1.
And that, AFAICT, is what Mallus and others have done. By selectively ignoring qualities of powers, they claim to have provided a realistic explanation of them. It is not a character flaw or a failure of imagination to note that they have not done so. It is, OTOH, wishful thinking to believe that they have done so.
RC
__________________ [A]ny good dungeon will have undiscovered treasures in areas that have been explored by the players, simply because it is impossible to expect that they will find every one of them.
- Module B1, Page 24
RCFG - My free mostly-OGC OGL game! RCFG is intended to be a fusion between OS & NS playstyles, giving the advantages of SRD-based gaming coupled with quick character and adventure generation and an Old School feel. BETA PLAYTEST NOW AVAILABLE! First Review!
The DM isn't deciding; the reaction of the creatures isn't dependent upon their nature and the situation.
This statement is exactly right. But I don't see how it contradicts my point.
Your position seems to imply there's a correct way to decide what the target creatures, one that get hashed by the use of powers like CaGI. I disagree. Also, as DM I like the challenge of having to explain, on the spot, why an NPC did something (as a result of a player 'taking control' for a moment). I get a kick out of that.
The way I look it, when a fighter uses CaGI, it becomes the target's nature to approach. That's what happens. It's then incumbent on the DM (and player) to provide whatever additional explanation/narration they deem necessary to make that event make sense (in the context of the game world).
__________________ "You should probably put your bandit hat on now. Personally, I- I don't have one, but I modified this tube sock." - Ash, Fantastic Mr. Fox.
This is a perfect description. If I could, I'd give you more XP.
Thanks Wulf.
(on an unrelated note, when's Trailblazer coming out? My group's gearing up to finish our long-running 3.5e campaign and TB looks like it would really help. It's either that or convert everything to M&M2e/W&W)
__________________ "You should probably put your bandit hat on now. Personally, I- I don't have one, but I modified this tube sock." - Ash, Fantastic Mr. Fox.
This statement is exactly right. But I don't see how it contradicts my point.
Well....
Quote:
The way I look it, when a fighter uses CaGI, it becomes the target's nature to approach. That's what happens.
So, the ability changes the nature of its target?
And, it is only usable by a select few?
And, it is not magic?
RC
__________________ [A]ny good dungeon will have undiscovered treasures in areas that have been explored by the players, simply because it is impossible to expect that they will find every one of them.
- Module B1, Page 24
RCFG - My free mostly-OGC OGL game! RCFG is intended to be a fusion between OS & NS playstyles, giving the advantages of SRD-based gaming coupled with quick character and adventure generation and an Old School feel. BETA PLAYTEST NOW AVAILABLE! First Review!
Does this 'Come and get it' thing require a saving throw roll vs. a defence? Or is it automatic? Is there a duration? Do they get a saving throw every round or something?
I'm not wanting to derail the discussion about whether it's magic, at all; it's just that I um, don't know how it works.
In previous editions, a fighter could taunt an opponent and the DM could decide to have the opponent close in. This is what Come and Get It does. The difference is that in 4e, using that power, the player gets to decide if the opponent closes in, albeit only once per day (or encounter, I forget...).
Say it with me... it's not magic, it's direct control over the narrative.
I have to disagree. One way balance was achieved in 4e was giving everybody spells. Label them however you want powers are spells or we can redefine previous spells as powers.
I understand what you mean by controlling the narrative, but this 'controlling the narrative' can be distilled to a type of spell effect.
Yes the flavor of the power text is clearly NOT magic. From a mechanical perspective it works no different than a spell effect that draws an opponent towards you.
So, I'm DMing a 3.5 game about 2 years ago. The fighter uses his spiked chain to hit an orc two squares away. The Orc is now bleeding and almost dead. (The spiked chain has changed the nature of the target.) A spiked chain is usable only by a select few. It is not magic.
Thoughts of the Arch Chancellor - My weblog on EN World - containing game related material, like: house rules, design theories, reviews, play reports, adventure ideas
Secret Member of <Think we would just hide our secret with a spoiler tag, eh?>
Does this 'Come and get it' thing require a saving throw roll vs. a defence? Or is it automatic? Is there a duration? Do they get a saving throw every round or something?
I'm not wanting to derail the discussion about whether it's magic, at all; it's just that I um, don't know how it works.
Come And Get It moves everyone within a short range next to you, provided they can get there. There's no roll. Once there, you get to attack them. They can act normally on their turn.
__________________ "If people bring so much courage to this world the world has to kill them to break them, so of course it kills them. The world breaks every one and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially. If you are none of these you can be sure it will kill you too but there will be no special hurry."
-- Ernest Hemingway, "A Farewell to Arms" Burning Empires:Boldaq Keep on the Shadowfell
Come And Get It moves everyone within a short range next to you, provided they can get there. There's no roll. Once there, you get to attack them. They can act normally on their turn.
OK, thanks. I did read the three core books when they came out. But yeah, that was a while ago.
I'm not wanting to derail the discussion about whether it's magic, at all; it's just that I um, don't know how it works.
Dude, this thread is a derailment of a derailment. I think the last post on topic was made 10 pages ago by a guy with the screen name "Not Me."
Anyways, here are important parts of the power:
Come and Get It You call your opponents toward you and deliver a blow they will never forget.
Effect: You pull each target 2 squares to a space adjacent to you. You cannot pull a target that cannot end adjacent to you. You then make a close attack targeting each adjacent enemy.
Attack: Strength vs. AC
Hit: 1[W] + Strength modifier damage.
Note that the target, if capable, come for the fighter, no attact roll needed for that. The only attack roll needed is for that actual hitting part. And, for what it's worth, the power requires a weapon.
Gamers Online Now: 684
Linear Mode
