General RPG DiscussionDiscussion of all RPGs and non-system-specific topics. DM/GM/player issues, settings, etc. Rules discussion belongs in one the forums below.
I don't understand the hate-on for that pointy nose on the Green Dragon. People don't complain about the Blue Dragon's huge nose horn (which looks a bit weird if you're not used to it), so why are they all up on Green Dragons?
The blue has a rhino-like horn that fits its look. The green has a flimsy nose-spike that doesn't really fit. Granted, it looks better in some depictions, not so much in others.
This month's Dragon features a Bestiary article entitled "Legendary Evils." I didn't make the connection until now, but this article must be in the vein of "Dangers of the Demonweb." I wonder which monsters from this set will get full 4e stats.
__________________ Veronica: Where's your brother?
Dick: I think he took Ghost World up to his room. They're probably up there making love. Or playing Dungeons and Dragons. Or both, at the same time. They're both, like, 12th-level dorks. I'm just sayin'
Monsters are things that won't wind up being used as players.
Narrow definition but that's what I'm rolling with.
So...you're disagreeing with Mr. Lee because you're using a different definition of "monster" than he is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeGKushner
Edit: And the reason I say that is because Humans are also a Monster Manual creature. As are Elves, Eladrin, etc... If the only defintion of monster is that it's in the Monster Manual, you're left with EVERYTHING being a monster.
Okay, how about a "monster" being defined as a creature not detailed in a PHB? Now we're back on track.
__________________ Iain Fyffe
Original member of the Rouseketeers!
I have played 4E. And just like all other editions of D&D, it is awesome!
no one quotes me in sigs - Crothian
For some reason, this doesn't fill me with rage. I must be interwebbing wrong. - Cadfan
Linear Mode
And yet another word from our sponsors
