General RPG DiscussionDiscussion of all RPGs and non-system-specific topics. DM/GM/player issues, settings, etc. Rules discussion belongs in one the forums below.
It's about verisimilitude, Danny. The avoidance of modern terms tricks the audience into thinking that, at least on some level, the imaginary world is real.
The way actual medievals would have perceived the word psionics is irrelevant. They don't play in our games. We care about the way the players, or readers if it's a published product, perceive the terms. It's the connotations that are important here, not the referent.
Using Expedition to the Barrier Peaks as an example:
ID Badge - bad
Talisman possessed of the power to open certain portals - good
Proper use of language is a big deal in secondary world creation. Ask Tolkien if you don't believe me.
__________________ The female tiefling's horns are not 'handlebars'.
I want magic to work like it does in Conan stories. Is that too much to ask?
No problem.
Only martial classes are available to PCs, who can only use magic via rituals. Develop your own set of rituals with Conan-esque flavor. Villians can use Conan-esque magic via DM fiat.
It's about verisimilitude, Danny. The avoidance of modern terms tricks the audience into thinking that, at least on some level, the imaginary world is real.
The way actual medievals would have perceived the word psionics is irrelevant. They don't play in our games. We care about the way the players, or readers if it's a published product, perceive the terms. It's the connotations that are important here, not the referent.
Proper use of language is a big deal in secondary world creation. Ask Tolkien if you don't believe me.
"Verisimilitude" is defined in the MW Dictionary as the quality or state of being "verisimilar"...which is defined as:
Quote:
Verisimilar:
1 : having the appearance of truth : probable
2 : depicting realism (as in art or literature)
Don't get me wrong- I understand what you're saying about language and the willing suspension of disbelief.
I just don't suffer that in regards to "psionics," and reject the idea that how actual people in an era analogous to the typical fantasy setting would have used a word is irrelevant.
Within the context of a quasi-medieval world, any term that could have existed in that time- again, like "television"- is fair game IMHO, and satisfies the quality of verisimilitude, assuming that it is used in a way as a person of that era would have used it. This would indeed be "proper use of language," despite our having a different, modern understanding of the word.
So, "television" as having "far-seeing" or as an alternate term for a device like a telescope (which, BTW, was also called the perspicillum, conspicillum, specillum, and penicillium before telescope "won the battle") is fine, using it for the watching of entertainment on crystal balls in every house would be disruptive.
Similarly, a word like "Atom" has several meanings & modern connotations, but is quite an old term, and would have been used by an Alchemist or Natural Scientist. It might be disruptive, but it still has verisimilitude.
Now, the more divergent a fantasy world gets from our own past, the stronger the argument about verisimilitude gets...but only up to a point.
Middle Earth? While it has sciences of some kind- advanced metallurgy enough to make fine steels, medieval style fortresses, etc.- it also seems to lack some of the tech we'd find in a more closely analogous 15th-16th century world...like sophisticated lenses to make telescopes, clockwork automatons or gunpowder. Part of that can probably be attributed to Sauron's effect on the world.
It's about verisimilitude, Danny. The avoidance of modern terms tricks the audience into thinking that, at least on some level, the imaginary world is real.
The way actual medievals would have perceived the word psionics is irrelevant. They don't play in our games. We care about the way the players, or readers if it's a published product, perceive the terms. It's the connotations that are important here, not the referent.
And I maintain that it's use is typically used as a cop out. People don't hate psionics because it "wrecks their verisimilitude," they say it does that because they hate psionics.
__________________ Psionics are too sci-fi, not like the traditional method of spell casting that has existed only in D&D, involves research, laboratory work, and formulas, and was cribbed directly from a series of science fiction novels. I mean, come on, calling forth the power to alter the world from your own center of will? That's not magical in the slightest! Not at all like my wizard's spell "Telepathy!"
I feel that 'atom' is fine, provided it's used in the original Greek sense of the indivisible. 'Atomic power', not so fine.
We'll have to agree to disagree about 'television'. I think it's jarring because the term is so strongly associated with the modern world, representing an almost ubiquitous technology, something most of us spend hours using every day.
'Psionics' is also a particularly bad term to use in a quasi-medieval setting because it was specifically created to sound modern. To make the magical seem non-magical. You're fighting against Campbell's propaganda, and it's strong propaganda, to make the powers of the mind seem like something technological, comprehensible, part of the modern world. He's trying to make what is really magic seem like it's engineering.
I think another term than psionics should be used, at least by the game world's inhabitants, and probably by the game rules. Because of Campbell's PR job, 'psionics' is almost the worst possible term a GM can use if he's trying to simulate a medieval type of world.
If he isn't, if he's going for something more Vancian, a setting that could be the far future of our world, then it's probably fine.
__________________ The female tiefling's horns are not 'handlebars'.
We'll have to agree to disagree about 'television'. I think it's jarring because the term is so strongly associated with the modern world, representing an almost ubiquitous technology, something most of us spend hours using every day.
I probably wouldn't use "television" except in rare circumstances- I was trying to find a word that has a modern meaning but old linguistic roots that could have been differently used in a previous era.
"Torch" was another one, showing that evolution in meaning (at least in English English speaking countries).
Quote:
'Psionics' is also a particularly bad term to use in a quasi-medieval setting because it was specifically created to sound modern.
I think another term than psionics should be used, at least by the game world's inhabitants, and probably by the game rules.
While I agree to a certain extent, the term itself is often just an excuse- many psioniphobes would reject the system if you called it "Turkish Delight."
The default world in D&D isn't Middle-Earth, it's Dying Earth. It's the far future. Magic and science mix. Gamers who want to turn D&D into Middle-Earth, with its much tighter set of sources and use of language, have some work to do.
The default D&D world is a pastiche of a variety of fantasy and mythological sources.
Dying Earth is one of those, where D&D got most of it's (pre 4e) magic system.
Middle Earth is another one of those, where D&D got a lot of it's PC races, a few monsters, and at least a few influences for a character class or two.
Mythologies from around the world added a variety of monsters, other novels contributed other ideas. Old 70's Kung Fu movies added the Monk (as it was in D&D long before martial arts anime hit American shores), and yes some sci-fi elements were added in from some sources of fantasy novels set in the far future. Within the main body of D&D works, only Expedition to the Barrier Peaks really muddled science and fantasy. Some D&D worlds, like Forgotten Realms, explicitly state in their that modern electronics don't work there (however psionics do work, albeit they are rare).
Of those sources, your typical gamer is going to be most familiar with Middle Earth, and it's a lot of people's idea of a typical "fantasy world" that isn't a D&D setting, and as you can depict Middle Earth decently well with most editions of D&D by simply removing some parts that don't fit I'm not going to think ill of gamers that don't immediately understand the original inspiration for many parts of D&D. This is especially true since a lot of those sources are novels which have faded into relative obscurity in the past few decades.
Doug, putting aside "psion" for a minute- but keeping our discussion of it in mind for context- let me ask this question:
Given that "psychic" has modern connotations of hucksters, con artists & 900 numbers, or that "mentalist" has modern connotations of a stage magician, what term would you suggest for the overall umbrella term under which we'd group the classes from the XPH and CompPsi?
what term would you suggest for the overall umbrella term under which we'd group the classes from the XPH and CompPsi?
Damn, now I have to do some work instead of just criticising.
How about 'natural magic', 'thought magic', 'internal magic', 'psyche', 'psychomancy' or the somewhat Tolkienesque 'unseen craft' or 'unseen art'.
I believe in the Middle Ages natural magic was contrasted with demonic magic, powers that derived from the Devil. Of course it's not the case that in D&D non-psionic powers are all demonic but it could be that this is either what psionicists believe, or maybe it's anti-wizard propaganda.
In terms of effects I think the magic in LotR is a good fit for psionics, it's more about precognitive visions and mind reading (ie psychic powers) than Vancian fireballs and prismatic sprays. My understanding is that Tolkien in LotR tends to avoid using the word 'magic' to describe powers that do seem magical, so his writing should be a good source of ideas for alternative terminology.
__________________ The female tiefling's horns are not 'handlebars'.
Last edited by Doug McCrae; 26th June 2009 at 08:35 PM..
Damn, now I have to do some work instead of just criticising.
How about 'natural magic', 'thought magic', 'internal magic', 'psyche', 'psychomancy' or the somewhat Tolkienesque 'unseen craft' or 'unseen art'.
Examining each in turn:
Natural magic: I get where you're coming from. However, since "Natural Science" was a blanket term for science & religious studies, this term would probably be (mis)understood in the same way. Not good for a special subsystem.
Thought magic: Not bad, but since both divine and arcane systems already have thought magics, and psi has abilities that aren't directly thought related, this would only be confusing.
Internal magic: Similar problems to Thought magic. Some powers, even iconic ones like telekinesis, don't really fit the label.
Psyche: better, but incomplete. It needs a suffix like -onics, -ology, -mancy or -sophy to make it descriptive of a system. (see below)
Psychomancy: This could work.
Unseen craft/Unseen art: Those are both terms for witchcraft or wizardry in general- not a good one for a subsystem.
To continue in this more constructive vein, how about:
Automancy- a power deriving exclusively from the will of the manifester?
For me, i can have both – magic is essentially scientific, but is so complex that while the basics are rather elementary few even come close to real mastery. These people then seem mysterious...
Psychokinesis is the umbrella term for various related specialty abilities, which may include:
* Telekinesis; movement of matter (micro and macro; move, lift, agitate, vibrate, spin, bend, break, or impact)
* Speed up or slow down the naturally occurring vibrations of atoms in matter to alter temperature, possibly to the point of ignition if combustible (also known as pyrokinesis and cryokinesis respectively).
* Self levitation (rising in the air unsupported, flying)
* Object deformation (including metal softening and bending).
* Influencing events (in time).
* Biological healing.
* Teleportation (disappearing and reappearing elsewhere).
* Phasing (ability) through matter.
* Transmutation of matter.
* Shape-shifting.
* Energy shield (force field).
* Control of magnetism.
* Control of photons (light waves/particles).
* Thoughtform projection (a physically perceived person, animal, creature, object, ghostly entity, etc., created in the mind and projected into three-dimensional space and observable by others; for thought images allegedly placed on film, see Thoughtography).
* Body swap
Psychokinetic sounds science-y, I suppose...
Mind mage works for me.
__________________ Cocoa and chocolate should not be considered a substitute for medications or your doctor’s advice.
Last edited by Herobizkit; 27th June 2009 at 11:49 PM..
You know, making an angry face at the use of the word "psionics" seems off when there's an arcane spell called Telekinesis.
__________________ Psionics are too sci-fi, not like the traditional method of spell casting that has existed only in D&D, involves research, laboratory work, and formulas, and was cribbed directly from a series of science fiction novels. I mean, come on, calling forth the power to alter the world from your own center of will? That's not magical in the slightest! Not at all like my wizard's spell "Telepathy!"
Doug, putting aside "psion" for a minute- but keeping our discussion of it in mind for context- let me ask this question:
Given that "psychic" has modern connotations of hucksters, con artists & 900 numbers, or that "mentalist" has modern connotations of a stage magician, what term would you suggest for the overall umbrella term under which we'd group the classes from the XPH and CompPsi?
One of the (later, I think) elements of Dark Sun that I always liked was that psionics was often called "the Way" or something like that. Psionics were referred to as mindbenders, although that defines a certain focus on telepathy.
This already has a defined meaning RL that also happens to work very nicely in the game; it is about seeking the arcane secrets buried in divine scriptures.
__________________ Carl Cramér
Member of the Netbook of Feats review board.
Linear Mode
And yet another word from our sponsors
