Proposal: Battlerage Vigor

DarwinofMind · 4th July 2009, 05:29 AM

With the new Errata I feel there is no longer a reason to ban this class feature.

So I'm reproposing it's inclusion

garyh · 4th July 2009, 06:05 AM

The "update" looks okay by me.

Yes to the new Battlerager Vigor.

EvolutionKB · 4th July 2009, 07:14 AM

I like the change as well, even if I'm not interested in that feature.

Ozymandias79 · 4th July 2009, 09:22 AM

YES from me too

covaithe · 4th July 2009, 01:04 PM

Mal Malenkirk · 4th July 2009, 08:57 PM

Frankly, it still seems potentially too strong to me but I am no longer 100% certain of it.

Since THP no longer stack, since you need to use a lot of invigorating powers to really score a bundle of THP and that these powers are typically not otherwise the strongest... I think it just might be all right. I hope, anyway, and I'd be curious to see it in play.

DarwinofMind · 5th July 2009, 12:44 AM

Looking again at the erratad version I think it's still more powerful than the other fighter options, and the fighter is clearly a powerful class. So it's definattly powerful but I just don't get the game breaking feel that I got it before.

It's probably still somewhat munchkin, but I don't think that's a reason to forbid something, before it was clearly game breaking, and now it's not so I think it's good for inclusion.

JoeNotCharles · 6th July 2009, 08:15 AM

Finally had time to read this update. I like it - no more stacking thp, and you have to hit to get it rather than be hit. so monsters aren't encouraged to attack elsewhere as much. YES