This product is 56 pages long and free. Cover, credits, intro and ToC take up 4 pages. I counted 17 pages of adds many of them for other Rite... [Read More]
Evocative City Sites Lorn's Entrepot (Abandoned Warehouse) by Rite Publishing. I was given this product for the purposes of this review. This product is 47 pages long. Cover, Credits, two pages of... [Read More]
Feats 101 by Rite Publishing. I was given this product for the purposes of this review. I have not yet played using these feats my review is based on reading the feats and checking a few against... [Read More]
The Plane Below: Secrets of the Elemental Chaos is a 4e D&D product describing some of the different planes in the 4e Cosmology. The book is a typical hard bound book that Wizards of the Coast... [Read More]
Hi,
I don't mean to be difficult or obtuse but I am having trouble wrapping my head around the "No Retailer Links" rule.
Specifically, this means no links to online retailers like the IPR, RPGShop and the like?
Does it include RPGNow, DTRPG, and other e-product retailers?
If the above is the case it will greatly diminish the press releases I can make. I will, of course, abide by the rule but first I wish to clearly understand it.
Yup. You can link to your website, though (which will obviously refer people wherever you want to refer them to), and if your product(s) are sold in EN World's store, you can link directly to that if you wish.
Yup. You can link to your website, though (which will obviously refer people wherever you want to refer them to), and if your product(s) are sold in EN World's store, you can link directly to that if you wish.
Many thanks for the quick reply! I will make note and adjust my press release appropriately. I assume you will keep us up to date on the EnWorld Store?
Thanks again,
Bill
Edit for Clarification: EnWorld Store: the coming of or planning of PDF sales.
Many thanks for the quick reply! I will make note and adjust my press release appropriately. I assume you will keep us up to date on the EnWorld Store?
I was referring to http://enworld.rpgshop.com/ (the affiliate store). There may be some more exciting announcements later this week, though!
Hey, thanks for asking for the clarification. I missed the new sticky COMPLETELY. Morrus, having two stickies that say "New Rules" makes it real easy to ignore both of them thinking I've already seen the "new rule" on this board.
__________________ Joe Mucchiello, Head Honcho at Throwing Dice Games
Priority One: Fatherhood.
Priority Two: Sanity.
Down on the list: seemingly real close to releasing a notebook essential. It's in layout! Has been for months now. (Just nod politely so I won't cry about this.)
"I've never heard of the term Flavor lawyer..." -- Scribble
I know this is in reference to press releases, but... does this include sig links? As you can see, my sig points to three off store vendors. Let me know if that needs to be changed.
I know this is in reference to press releases, but... does this include sig links? As you can see, my sig points to three off store vendors. Let me know if that needs to be changed.
While we are clarifying, obviously we cannot have links to off site pdf vendors, but can we reference them by name?
Just so I don't step on any toes
For the moment, I'll say no (not in a press release, news item or sig), although I may come back and revise that at some future date. This doesn't apply to general conversation on the boards, of course, where you can say whatever you like.
Okay, done. The sig links now point to our own website, where links can be found to the various e-retailer sites. I think this is okay Let me know it it isn't.
Hey, thanks for asking for the clarification. I missed the new sticky COMPLETELY. Morrus, having two stickies that say "New Rules" makes it real easy to ignore both of them thinking I've already seen the "new rule" on this board.
Yeah, I missed that as well. I see that the announcement is for publishers only. What about those non-publishing folks throughout the site that point to various products when asked about them?
I posted this elsewhere but I'll repost here for consideration:
I think a wiser course of action would be, at the very least, to allow publishers who are paying members to continue to post non-EnWorld links in their press releases and signatures. The incentive for publishers such as myself who have not yet purchased a membership (I don't use EnWorld to email, PM, or the like) just dropped down from "I think about signing up now and then" to absolute zero, and this current policy will likely see a large number of publishers not renewing membership considering the value that EnWorld has for them has dramatically dropped.