PHBII: Dragon Shaman

Patlin

Explorer

• Nov 10, 2006

• #1

Another Base class from the PHBII -- Do we want them, and should we limit their region of origin to Argonessan?

 

log in or register to remove this ad

R

Rystil Arden

First Post

• Nov 10, 2006

• #2

These guys are one of the only base classes that I think are almost too weird for my home campaign, but they actually do make sense in Eberron from a very narrow region. I'd accept them and limit them, as you've suggested.

 

stonegod

Spawn of Khyber/LEB Judge

• Nov 10, 2006

• #3

Keith Baker has some suggestions on where dragon shamans might come from, and I don't disagree. Kobolds, for example, make a clear example of non-Argonessen dragon shamans. However, I agree that a general Khovaire citizen would not become a DS.

 

Erekose13

Explorer

• Nov 18, 2006

• #4

Many of the peoples that Keith mentions in that article work well, though the cult of Sovereigns feel a little off to me. The point about alignment is valid though as dragons are not restricted to alignment in Eberron, neither should dragon shamans (or half-dragons).

 

Patlin

Explorer

• Nov 27, 2006

• #5

I'm OK with limitting to Argonessan and kobolds.

 

Erekose13

Explorer

• Dec 2, 2006

• #6

Same here, Yes

 

stonegod

Spawn of Khyber/LEB Judge

• Dec 2, 2006

• #7

W/ the Argonnessen and kobolds, YES

 

stonegod

Spawn of Khyber/LEB Judge

• Dec 20, 2006

• #8

I think the kobold extension should also apply to the lizardfolk of Q'barra.

 

Bront

The man with the probe

• Dec 21, 2006

• #9

I'm all for leaving it a bit more open, but I can understand wanting some restrictions.

I haven't found anything objectionable about the DS yet.

 

stonegod

Spawn of Khyber/LEB Judge

• Dec 21, 2006

• #10

Is that a vote?