"Busywork" in RPG's... - Page 3





+ Log in or register to post
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 49
  1. #21
    Registered User
    The Great Druid (Lvl 17)

    Lanefan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    5,216
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore Lanefan
    Quote Originally Posted by buzz
    Calculating XP is pretty easy, IMO. I can't do it in my head like my Monday DM, but it's never taken me more than a few minutes.
    Our DM (using 3.0) has had to resort to a computer program, which has sped the process up considerably...our party's levels range from 7 to 10...before, when calculating by hand, we'd often have to ask at the end of one session for ExP to be done by next session, so as not to blow up half the session on ExP calaulations (this'd be for several encounters over a session or three).

    Lanefan

 

  • #22
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    buzz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    6,769
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I Defended The Walls!

    ø Ignore buzz
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanefan
    Our DM (using 3.0) has had to resort to a computer program, which has sped the process up considerably...our party's levels range from 7 to 10...before, when calculating by hand, we'd often have to ask at the end of one session for ExP to be done by next session, so as not to blow up half the session on ExP calaulations (this'd be for several encounters over a session or three).
    We usually give the DM time to do official XP between sessions, too. I'm just saying, I don't think the process is that complicated, and with all the XP calculators available, it effectively takes no time. At the very least, I think it's pretty far down the totem pole of busywork in 3e, IME. YMMV.

    I think Mark wins the thread with NPC creation. The main reason I stopped my CotSQ game after chapter one was the massive amount of time spent converting the NPCs/monsters to 3.5 and formating stat blocks. If this thread points to anything that WotC needs to remedy about 3.x, it's that.
    ENWorld Chicago Gameday: Getting people together to game since 2001.

  • #23
    Registered User
    Myrmidon (Lvl 10)



    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    3,001
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore Joshua Randall
    I still don't think N/PC generation can be called busywork. It's essential to the game, and therefor not something that could be skipped or dropped in the interest of speed. (Unless you want to go stat-less or dice-less, but then you're no longer playing D&D, at least as people commonly think of it.)

    I agree that magic item identification, treasure division, and shopping expeditions are all busywork. When I DM, I try to get the players to do this stuff between sessions. They don't, but I keep trying.

    Spell preparation is a tricky case. It has elements of busywork, yet it's essential for several core classes. And if you remove those classes, you fundamentally alter the game. But the sheer number of spells available makes spell preparation a daunting task.

    = = =

    Here's another one: shapechanging magic or abilities, from alter self to wildshape to polymorph. Recalculating everything is tremendous busywork that is often irrelevant, particulary if the form was selected for non-combat purposes.

  • #24
    Registered User
    Novice (Lvl 1)



    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    272
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore Brimshack
    I love generating characters. In fact I probably enjoy it more than the average game. For me that is definitely NOT busy work.

    I do find keeping track of equipment rather a pain.

  • #25
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    buzz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    6,769
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I Defended The Walls!

    ø Ignore buzz
    Quote Originally Posted by Joshua Randall
    I still don't think N/PC generation can be called busywork. It's essential to the game, and therefor not something that could be skipped or dropped in the interest of speed.
    The problem on the NPC side is that there's currently only one process, and it's the same one used for creating PCs. Ergo, you're generating a lot of data that's simply not really relevant for a character that may only get used for one adventure. Losing or abbreviating that extraneous data doesn't affect gameplay, ergo, the process could be simplified. All that matters is that the end result is a suitable challenge (or suitable color) for the scenario.

    Spycraft 2.0 and Iron Heroes both have presented solutions for this, and neither take veers towards unwanted simplification.
    ENWorld Chicago Gameday: Getting people together to game since 2001.

  • #26
    Kickstarting TimeWatch!
    The Grand Druid (Lvl 20)

    Piratecat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    26,650
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore Piratecat
    Quote Originally Posted by buzz
    Calculating XP is pretty easy, IMO. I can't do it in my head like my Monday DM, but it's never taken me more than a few minutes.
    You're a better man than I. I hated it so much, I largely removed xp from my game.

    Interesting, NPC generation isn't nearly as much busywork for me nowadays as it used to be. Even though my group is 20th-22nd lvl, NPC gen takes about a fifth the time that it used to. I think that's because I no longer write down every miniscule detail. More powerful NPCs means that combat bonuses can come from a variety of sources (inherent bonuses, high stats, luck, permanent magical effects, all sorts of things) so I can craft a good challenge without feeling like I have to enumerate where every skill point or attack bonus comes from. It saves a ton of time.

    Conversely, I love character creation. I find it really fun.
    - Piratecat, EN World Admin. Now Kickstarting TimeWatch, a time travel game - please go check it out!

  • #27
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    buzz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    6,769
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I Defended The Walls!

    ø Ignore buzz
    Quote Originally Posted by Piratecat
    I think that's because I no longer write down every miniscule detail. More powerful NPCs means that combat bonuses can come from a variety of sources (inherent bonuses, high stats, luck, permanent magical effects, all sorts of things) so I can craft a good challenge without feeling like I have to enumerate where every skill point or attack bonus comes from. It saves a ton of time.
    Monte Cook outlined a sorta similar way to wing NPCs in a Dungeoncraft article a few months back.

    Thing is, this kind of process isn't what the rules say. It only comes with experience and a little math-fu. The simple fact that you felt it necessary and beneficial to do this says to me, "D&D could be made better by giving DMs a faster way to make NPCs."

    The current chargen process is great if you're a player; there's lots of bits to fiddle with and plan out to bring your PC to life. If you're a DM, it's simply more work than should be necessary, IMO.
    ENWorld Chicago Gameday: Getting people together to game since 2001.

  • #28
    Moderator
    Superhero (Lvl 15)

    Stalker0's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    8,029
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore Stalker0
    The fly rules are bloated and difficult to run. Unless you have perfect fly, its a whole lot of numbers and mini work to run the scenario correctly.

  • #29
    Registered User
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    The_Gneech's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Shadizar, city of wickedness
    Posts
    2,398
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    ø Ignore The_Gneech
    Quote Originally Posted by buzz
    Monte Cook outlined a sorta similar way to wing NPCs in a Dungeoncraft article a few months back.

    Thing is, this kind of process isn't what the rules say. It only comes with experience and a little math-fu. The simple fact that you felt it necessary and beneficial to do this says to me, "D&D could be made better by giving DMs a faster way to make NPCs."

    The current chargen process is great if you're a player; there's lots of bits to fiddle with and plan out to bring your PC to life. If you're a DM, it's simply more work than should be necessary, IMO.
    Strangely enough, this is one of the reasons I love the HERO System. For all its math and wonky formulae for creating new powers, when the rubber hits the road all you need to think about are "the parts you need to think about" so to speak. If you want a character to be ferocious but maneuverable in combat, you just give them n levels in combat and the Acrobatics skill and you're done, without having to think, "Oh, well, he'll need to have X amount of fighter to have enough BAB, Y amount of rogue in order to tumble effectively, which means that skills P, Q, and R can only have thus-and-so ranks and oh yeah, that'll nerf his Will save, won't it?" HERO characters aren't the complicated lattices that D&D characters are. For the average adventure I could build the BBEG for HERO in a matter of minutes compared to the time it takes me in D&D. E-Tools has helped in that regard, but we all know the fate of that now, don't we?

    OTOH, the reason I play D&D (besides my players not being intimidated by it the way they are by HERO for whatever reason) is that there's so much pre-written stuff for me. Dungeon is a godsend. If/when I ever want to run something that doesn't use the 3.5 ruleset straight from the box (and thus isn't supported by E-Tools), I'm going to have a lot of heavy deciding to do.

    -The Gneech
    gneech.com -- My writing, comics, and art, including NeverNever, The Suburban Jungle, and the Brigid & Greg Fictionlets.

    Sword & Sorcery Saga -- S&S Roleplaying based on Star Wars Saga Edition

    Uncanny Midnight Tales -- Pulp mystery/horror based on Star Wars Saga Edition

    "Not everybody likes the same sort of games.
    Everybody ought to play the sort of games they like.
    It's not a stupid idea to sometimes try something you're not sure if you like or not.
    Just because somebody likes or dislikes something you feel differently about doesn't make them (or you) stupid or a jerk.
    Except Julie Andrews. If you dislike Julie Andrews, you're a jerk. And Golden Retriever puppies." --Barsoomcore

    "There is a handsome and mysterious stranger in your future. He will try to kill you and take your stuff." --Sejs

    C'mon, 5E!

  • #30
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    buzz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    6,769
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    I Defended The Walls!

    ø Ignore buzz
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Gneech
    Strangely enough, this is one of the reasons I love the HERO System. For all its math and wonky formulae for creating new powers, when the rubber hits the road all you need to think about are "the parts you need to think about" so to speak.
    I'm a big HERO fan. That said, it's still sort of fudging to only stat out the bits you think will matter. I mean, there's no system that lets you spit out an NPC that will be a good challenge for a group of 350pt PCs. You're still kind of winging it and using your GM-fu.

    That said, it is nice to just be able to throw some points around, instead of leveling up and piecing classes together. It also helps that Hero Designer is one of the best chargen apps in existence.
    ENWorld Chicago Gameday: Getting people together to game since 2001.

  • + Log in or register to post
    Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Forked: "Math and Grind" or "Why Rechan is Right" (From: "4e One-trick ponies")
      By RyvenCedrylle in forum D&D and Pathfinder Rules & Discussion
      Replies: 73
      Last Post: Saturday, 5th October, 2013, 03:38 AM
    2. Combining "d20 Past" with "Urban Arcana" to make "d20 Fantasy"
      By Jack Daniel in forum D&D and Pathfinder Rules & Discussion
      Replies: 5
      Last Post: Tuesday, 3rd May, 2005, 06:22 AM
    3. "The learning game" "El juego de aprender" "Lære leken" IC
      By Tor L'Tha in forum Playing the Game
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: Tuesday, 14th December, 2004, 07:26 PM
    4. Replies: 0
      Last Post: Monday, 29th November, 2004, 07:19 PM
    5. "The learning game" "El juego de aprender" "Lære leken"
      By Tor L'Tha in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming Discussion
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: Monday, 29th November, 2004, 07:01 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •