Area of Effect/Size Printable Templates? - Page 7





+ Log in or register to post
Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 96
  1. #61
    I currenly do my grids / templates on a grid where each box is 59 pixels across and the lines are one pixel themselves. One or two were done by merging 4 squares into one, but those are larger than I like working with.

 

  • #62
    These were done on 96x96 pixels to the inch grids
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails pro evil.GIF   pro evil hardgrid.GIF   pro evil hardgrid 2.GIF   pro law hardgrid.GIF   pro chaos hardgrid.GIF  

    Last edited by frankthedm; Monday, 26th March, 2007 at 07:39 PM.

  • #63
    Awesome! Thanks!
    Are you a player looking to join a D&D game in the Toronto area? Send me an email at fenris_wolff@hotmail.com

  • #64
    Quote Originally Posted by carborundum
    I'm inclined to say the first one. The vertical axis mirrors the horizontal one, unlike #3, and the transitions seem fair.
    Seems fair? Fair often takes a back seat to rules. Have we forgotton how the counting squares rather than measuring steals area from a 20' radius? That theft does have to be replicated in 3d to achieve a proper result. If it seems "fair" too much area has been given.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Hardgrid softgrid fireball.GIF  
    Last edited by frankthedm; Tuesday, 27th March, 2007 at 10:37 PM.

  • #65
    Here is an example of grid based radii 5' to 40' across. Also included is what the rounded radii look like in comparison.


  • #66
    Registered User
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Nail's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA PCs now: Genasi Warlord 5 Human BRV Fighter 5
    Posts
    8,000
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Ignore Nail
    Huh.

    I never noticed how much area you lose from a radius by using the "count the squares" method.

    Huh.

    BTW: I used the Steel Squire templates last night in game -- I even modified my bad guy a bit so that I could use them all! (20'r., 10'r., 30' diagonal cone, 30' straight cone) Great fun, and definitely worth it.
    - Nail

    Last edited by Nail: Today....just a few minutes ago

  • #67
    Registered User
    Gallant (Lvl 3)

    carborundum's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    857
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Ignore carborundum
    Quote Originally Posted by frankthedm
    Seems fair? Fair often takes a back seat to rules. Have we forgotten how the counting squares rather than measuring steals area from a 20' radius? That theft does have to be replicated in 3d to achieve a proper result. If it seems "fair" too much area has been given.
    Ah, I forgot the spurious mathematical justification! Humble apologies!

    A quick 4/3*PI*r^3 (with r=4 square-lengths) gives us a volume of 268 cubes.
    Counting cubes in the templates gives 208 cubes, 168 cubes and either 228 or 232 cubes (depending on the corners).


    Initial evidence would point to the third one being the most reasonable.

    However...

    When using a 20' radius template and counting squares, we are told to use 40 squares, while the real area is about 50. One could argue that 80% coverage is therefore demanded by the rules, and choose the template giving the closest to (268*0.8) 214 cubes. Number one!

    I await your critique of this spurious justification with a quivering bladder.

  • #68
    Quote Originally Posted by carborundum
    Ah, I forgot the spurious mathematical justification! Humble apologies!

    A quick 4/3*PI*r^3 (with r=4 square-lengths) gives us a volume of 268 cubes.
    Counting cubes in the templates gives 208 cubes, 168 cubes and either 228 or 232 cubes (depending on the corners).


    Initial evidence would point to the third one being the most reasonable.

    However...

    When using a 20' radius template and counting squares, we are told to use 40 squares, while the real area is about 50. One could argue that 80% coverage is therefore demanded by the rules, and choose the template giving the closest to (268*0.8) 214 cubes. Number one!

    I await your critique of this spurious justification with a quivering bladder.
    Thanks for the math. It is not my strong point.



    One seems about right. As I said before the rules are not kind to area effects. One does not get measure area to determine what is effected. One has to count squares. We already have a three for two rule when going diagonally in 2D. For 3D, we have to first figure out what standard of square counting to use. The amount that cliped may wind up increasing once a third dimension is introduced. Once that standard is made, the it has to be followed, regardless of how badly it clips the area.

    >>>>>>>>>>>

    Lets say going from the two corners farest apart in the cube costs 2 squares, which of the three in this post match that best?

  • #69
    Registered User
    Gallant (Lvl 3)

    carborundum's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    857
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Ignore carborundum
    Did you mean how does the three for two work out numbers-wise in diagonal steps?
    If you take a 2x2, Mr. Pythagoras says the diagonal is 2.8 (square root of 8). Three for two isn't that harsh really.
    For a 2x2x2 cube, the longest diagonal has one side 2 long and one 2.8. This works out at about 3.5 (3.46) - what would you call that? A cost of seven for four diagonal 3D hops, I guess.


    Sorry, not quite sure what you mean with the "two furthest" thing, Mr. Frank. I'm glad you liked the argument though

  • #70
    Registered User
    Gallant (Lvl 3)



    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Posts
    4,509
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Ignore Pyrex
    Quote Originally Posted by frankthedm
    Thanks for the math. It is not my strong point.



    One seems about right.
    One certianly seems to be the most intuitive 3d representation of the 2d template even if it's not the most accurate model of a 20' radius in 5' cubes.

  • + Log in or register to post
    Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Area of Effect Templates
      By mgbeach in forum D&D and Pathfinder Rules & Discussion
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: Monday, 3rd May, 2010, 03:24 AM
    2. Area of Effect Templates
      By el-remmen in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming Discussion
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: Wednesday, 28th March, 2007, 06:25 PM
    3. Spell area of effect templates
      By zoroaster100 in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming Discussion
      Replies: 8
      Last Post: Sunday, 8th August, 2004, 08:10 PM
    4. Area of effect templates
      By kramis in forum D&D and Pathfinder Rules & Discussion
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: Saturday, 16th March, 2002, 08:36 AM
    5. Spell area of effect templates!
      By Hedgemage in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming Discussion
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: Sunday, 10th March, 2002, 02:50 AM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •