Feat: Incredible Resiliency

Velmont · Apr 16, 2007

Just an idea like that:

Requirement: Toughness, Base Fort: +2

Evil to put Toughness as a requirement, but make senses, and also would make toughness a bit less useless. But how many people would like to spend 2 feat to get 3+your level hp?

Bront · Apr 16, 2007

I know one currently semi-shapeless elf...

Manzanita · Apr 17, 2007

I think it would be reasonable to require toughness as a prereq. I don't think there needs to be any other prereqs if that were the case. I currently play a dwarven defender wanna-be with toughness & improved toughness. Of course, if improved toughness had been around when he took the toughness feat, he'd proably have taken a different tack...

Erekose13 · Apr 17, 2007

Bront said:
I know one currently semi-shapeless elf...

Got that right!

I like the pre-req's Velmont has suggested.

Knight Otu · Apr 18, 2007

Erekose13 said:
Got that right!

I like the pre-req's Velmont has suggested.

I concur. There is a reason that this type of prerequisite isn't usually used, namely the oddities that have already been pointed out.

Bront · Apr 19, 2007

Updated the feat.

Manzanita · Apr 19, 2007

This is cool. I Yes vote again.

GnomeWorks · Apr 20, 2007

Wouldn't it be easier to just say that you get an additional hit point per hit die?

Bront · Apr 21, 2007

Technicaly, though saying it this way means that someone with a con of 6 could potentialy not get the benifit of the feat at a given level if he rolls low enough.

Also, I was trying to make it different for anti-plagerism reasons.

GnomeWorks · Apr 21, 2007

Bront said:
Technicaly, though saying it this way means that someone with a con of 6 could potentialy not get the benifit of the feat at a given level if he rolls low enough.

That was really the only difference I could see, hence why I asked.