Living Enworld Judge
Explorer
Meh, forum's having trouble with big post edits. So I'll wait on editing it.
Yep, though at this point I guess I don't care much about that addendum any more--I mean, it's not like I was going to vote against the proposal, but it has dropped below the level of GM credits that could motivate me to spend that much time and effort. Still, I know there are people who like to do this (for me it's like pulling hairs...and maybe splashing salt on it afterwards), so I'm glad they'll be getting something if they do it (that's why I wouldn't vote against--it's painful to vote against something that gives people something when you want them to have more because your vote against might mean they get nothing at all).Manzanita said:I wouldn't be opposed to having more than 1 DM credit awarded for a particularly useful summary post. We're not looking for 'story hours' of course. We're looking for consise material that will help future DMs and players.
Rystil Arden said:Here's an interesting question--I recall the idea for judge review, but what about GM review of summaries of their own adventures by other people? What if someone summarises an adventure extremely poorly and/or inaccurately because they are not the GM and the GM is aware of this? Will the summary be removed so that it won't be misleading?