Making your own power cards - Page 19
  1. #181
    Member
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    tintagel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Statesboro, GA
    Posts
    135
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block tintagel


    Friend+
    Oh yeah, that would work. I am not at home (in a hotel for a conference) - otherwise I would start playing with it. Also, a sylized fist might work.... dunno.

  2. #182
    Member
    Orcus on an Off-Day (Lvl 22)

    TarionzCousin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Portland, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    5,737
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    PathfinderStar TrekD&DPlanescapeCircvs MaximvsGygax Memorial Fund

    Block TarionzCousin


    Friend+
    I vote for tintagel's colored icons, even if the "standard action" icon needs to be changed.

    Nice work, people. This thread has some great stuff.

  3. #183
    Why not just make the * smaller?
    Anyone know if there are full round action in 4th ed?

  4. #184
    Quote Originally Posted by Trolls
    So, a new round of opinions!
    I guess I'm one of the few who doesn't like the bottom one...

    For me, the top ones are the best

  5. #185
    Quote Originally Posted by Trolls
    Ok, I think this next one is getting pretty close
    Since a lot of people seem to like Trolls' versions, I thought I'd throw in a few thoughts I had when I was working on the cards that I posted earlier.

    I thought that there were too many cards to lay out at once, so it would be nice to stack them overlapped and have a bit of information showing on the top. What I thought would be good info is:
    name
    action cost (standard, move, etc)
    type (burst, blast, ranged, etc)
    requirement (implement, melee weapon, ranged weapon)
    whether it causes an OA.

    I also put special effect types towards the top (acid, fire, force, etc), since I thought it might be important depending on who you're attacking. If all these things could be seen in the top inch or so of the card, they could be stacked for space and tapped only when used.

    Looking over character and monster powers, I noticed the following action costs:
    immediate (reaction)
    Dragon breath when first bloodied
    free
    Mage Hand: Drop an object the hand is holding
    standard
    Mage Hand: Conjure a floating hand.
    move
    Mage Hand: You can move the hand up to 5.
    minor
    Mage Hand: pick up or move a different object.
    Mage Hand: sustain the hand.

    I know I'm using a lot of examples from Mage Hand, but it is a good example of a power that can slow someone down while they're reading the card (at least until they learn it well). I expect Rituals to be another cost. Inherent abilities and skills could also be considered another type or part of the "free" actions. I don't know how Utility Powers would fit in this.

    Frequency includes At-Will, Encounter, Daily, and Recharge. The dice graphics look okay, but I find that they are slower to read than numbers and don't do as well when printed at small sizes.

    When players used the character sheets during combat, they slowed down *a lot* trying to find certain pieces of information. The pieces that could use some quick eye-caching features were: range/blast, to-hit and damage stats, secondard attacks.

    Other things in the back of my mind:
    colors good for color-blinded people. Have the red, green, black colors be progressively dark in grayscale.
    consistency: try to put the same information in the same place, or in the same order relative to other text.
    colors and text: If colors are used, try to back it up with text or icons. Since there are various types of color-blindness, some people may not see the blue background of a circle.

  6. #186
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Scout (Lvl 6)



    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,699
    Reviews
    Read 1 Reviews

    Block Khaalis


    Friend+
    Quote Originally Posted by emass
    I guess I'm one of the few who doesn't like the bottom one...
    For me, the top ones are the best
    Second the motion. I'd personally vote for the top row style. However, I would also suggest dropping the color code from the symbols. Do we really need another color set to add to the complexity? Also, as for "action" symbols... do we have to have it be an option between Attack type or Action symbol? Why can't we add a dot to the lower section of the card like in earlier iterations? Or possibly over the lower section of the left hand column?

    Edit: Oh and just to add - this is fantastic work. I love how these are developing. Great work.
    Attached Files Attached Files  

  7. #187
    Community Supporter COPPER SUBSCRIBER
    Novice (Lvl 1)

    WampusCat43's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Fort Thomas, KY
    Posts
    383
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block WampusCat43


    Friend+
    So, who's got a full set? I'll try 'em out tomorrow night.

  8. #188
    Member
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    tintagel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Statesboro, GA
    Posts
    135
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block tintagel


    Friend+
    I do, but it's using the Magic the Gathering template, which I am ditching for this new DDM style. But yeah, I have all of them for the existing Pregens. Check page 2 of this thread, I think.

  9. #189
    Member
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Trolls's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    142
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Trolls


    Friend+
    Next iteration:
    -New standard action symbol (looks great!)
    -Redrew exclamation mark (wasn't quite symmetrical after the resize, edges looked strange)
    -Added blur behind action symbols to make them blend in/feel more natural
    -Added Attack type (Int vs. Ref) to last notch. That leaves us with nowhere to put Channel Divinity or Pact etc. The trick is whether that or Sustain: Minor is more important. For warlocks, it's not (pact is a one time choice), but for Channel Divinity, it does determine how often you can use the power. Any thoughts?



    I know a couple of you still like the attack type rather than action type in the top bubble, but seeing these I think we're on to a winner.

    Lindiore -
    Since these are power cards, not monster cards, we don't have to worry about recharges. Also, all the most important (decision making) factors are along the top and down the side, so you can stack them.
    Oh, and all colour coded/symbol information is repeated in words on the card.

  10. #190
    Nice.

+ Log in or register to post
Page 19 of 200 FirstFirst ... 9101112131415161718192021222324252627282969119 ... LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Similar Threads

  1. [Game Aid]Card styles for MSE (Power cards, monster cards)
    By Knight Otu in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: Tuesday, 21st December, 2010, 11:40 PM
  2. Forked Thread: Making your own power cards
    By dhunton in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, 25th January, 2009, 02:16 AM
  3. Forked Thread: Making your own power cards
    By FC Jamison in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Sunday, 21st December, 2008, 04:35 PM
  4. Forked Thread: Making your own power cards
    By Netminder69 in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Wednesday, 29th October, 2008, 02:01 PM
  5. A Box for Power Cards - Forked Thread: Making your own power cards
    By Mercutio01 in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Thursday, 3rd July, 2008, 01:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •