4E Living 4th Edition Discussion Thread - Page 17
  1. #161
    Member
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Graf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    undisclosed
    Posts
    3,994
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Graf


    Friend+
    Quote Originally Posted by Ata
    I'd like to note that checking correct power update is going to be harder for judges if there's not a "utility powers" entry...IMO
    There is a utility power section down at the bottom.

    The point is that there are really TWO SHEETS.
    1.Is for playing.
    1 is for checking the math and powers.

    For playing purposes it doesn't matter where your daily/encounter powers come from (item, power, race, whatever) you just need to know their frequency/bonus to-hit/effects.

    For checking purposes? You need to know where it came from.

    Squeezing those two into one sheet is a really bad idea. You wind up with something that does nothing well, and annoys everyone.
    Quote Originally Posted by [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=3387"
    Erekose13[/url]] think in general the Character Sheet on Wizards.com can serve as the basis on where to draw the line.
    This is a classic example of a terribly designed sheet. WotC knows this. They made up a better sheet (the horizontal sheet) and are trying to sell it to you for 20$. Whatever we do I don't think we should use their sheet except to show what not to do.

    During normal play do I need to see that I'm using my +2 int modifier for my AC along with my leather armor? No. No I don't.
    What is MISC? How can I tell? If I can't tell what the damn bonus is for why are you telling me about it? "Well... he's got a +2 from something.... let me go search around on the sheet to see what it could be..."






    While
    ... we may need an "other" column
    ... we may (should?) have a template (help! I can't do templates...)

    I don't think we should have feats and powers and classes shoved into "other" and then have each and every character sheet use its own notation and force judges to wade through a dozen different versions of the same info. I realize that Cov said he though I 'wasn't far' so this may not be suggested but...

    the goal of the math section should NOT be "easy for players to fill in". It should be "EASY TO CHECK".

    I agree that '--' is a PINA and should be dropped in favor of blank spaces. I think I was worried it'd freak out if there was a blank space.
    Last edited by Graf; Tuesday, 26th August, 2008 at 02:19 AM.

  2. #162
    Member
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Graf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    undisclosed
    Posts
    3,994
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Graf


    Friend+
    Not to rant about something nobody cares about... but look at the WotC passive skills section... wtf is that? 10+skill and then there's another box on the left called score...

    I suppose the "score" section is suppose to include your racial bonuses.... but you include that in the frikking role anyway....

    That level of abject, incomprehensible ineptitude has to be deliberate...

  3. #163
    Member
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Graf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    undisclosed
    Posts
    3,994
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Graf


    Friend+
    Quote Originally Posted by covaithe View Post
    In Quagmire's sheet, there are more than 60 table cells dedicated to feats, and only two of them aren't empty.
    I do see your point in that it seems "wasteful" but I think this is one of those times when you have to think about the setting in a year or two....

    There are a lot of tichy little feat bonuses floating around and by level 3 every character has at least 3 feats...
    You have people training skills with feats, you have people multiclassing, you have skill focus, you have feats that give weird bonuses (quickdraw? +2 init).

    That's a lot for one column.

    While your sample 1st level character doesn't have a lot of feat related bonuses I think that cramming those feats in to a big column along with class features and powers is not a hot idea.


    The math for DnD is complex... I don't love that (though it's easier than 3.5) but I don't think the solution is to try to hide it way.

    The human eye can scan through blank space extremely efficiently; if we write a template that lets you just fill in stuff you have and is otherwise blank I think it'd be the best of both worlds.

    Like text that appears when you edit but not post...?
    Last edited by Graf; Tuesday, 26th August, 2008 at 07:24 AM.

  4. #164
    Member
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Graf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    undisclosed
    Posts
    3,994
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Graf


    Friend+
    So the Transitive Isles setting is probably 95~98% done.

    The writing is... poor.... but, honestly, I can't really keep going through and fixing grammar, poor word choice, etc. It's a hacked together version of virtually everybody's ideas so far (with some overriding guidelines to keep it somewhat concise and playable).

    But if people don't like it now it's not like better spelling and grammar are going to somehow redeem it.

    So I think the next stage is that the rest of the facilitators decide on it's "done-ness" and then we vote.

  5. #165
    Member
    Defender (Lvl 8)



    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    4,971
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block covaithe


    Friend+
    I agree that Transitive Isles is done. I'd say if we get one or two more facilitators to say yes, go ahead and start the vote.


    About feats. Eh. I looked through some of the 13th level characters in KK2, trying to figure out how their feats would affect our tables. I still think that relatively few feats provide flat bonuses that fit nicely in tables. The majority of them are situational, or give weird little bonuses that will be annoying to notate no matter how we organize the sheets. But I don't really feel strongly enough about it to push.

    I agree that the main purpose of the math section is to make it easy to approve, but I also think we should avoid making it any more difficult to fill out than we have to. Remember, if a player submits an unreadable sheet, the judges can always just say "I'm sorry, this sheet is too disorganized for me to be able to approve it yet. Could you please reformat it along the lines of (link to better sheet) and resubmit?".

  6. #166
    Hey everyone sorry for not being active the last few days, things are pretty hectic with work... thanks for picking up my slack

    Edit: I'm good with the transitive isles completeness
    Last edited by renau1g; Tuesday, 26th August, 2008 at 03:41 PM.

  7. #167
    Member
    Waghalter (Lvl 7)

    garyh's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    5,839
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block garyh


    Friend+
    I also agree the Transitive Isles are essentially complete.

  8. #168
    Member
    Acolyte (Lvl 2)

    Graf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    undisclosed
    Posts
    3,994
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Graf


    Friend+
    Cool. For the record somebody who isn't me should do the setting poll.

  9. #169
    Member
    Defender (Lvl 8)



    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    4,971
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block covaithe


    Friend+
    Okay. I've created a poll on Transitive Isles. So all that's left to do before opening character submissions is nail down the character sheet a bit more, maybe, and decide on regional benefits.

  10. #170
    I'll try to provide more feedback on the character sheet, especially on the math sections that you two have been working on. Just making my way through the other threads first.

+ Log in or register to post
Page 17 of 48 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415161718192021222324252627 ... LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Similar Threads

  1. Discussion - General Discussion Thread 2010-11
    By Living Enworld Judge in forum Living EN World
    Replies: 205
    Last Post: Tuesday, 4th September, 2012, 05:03 PM
  2. Living Supers - General Discussion Thread
    By Living Supers Judge in forum Talking the Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Wednesday, 19th October, 2005, 08:11 AM
  3. LIVING GREYHAWK: DM's discussion group set up
    By Emirikol in forum Roleplaying Games General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Friday, 30th January, 2004, 05:13 PM
  4. (Discussion) Chatroom Living Enworld Games
    By Creamsteak in forum Living EN World
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Monday, 13th October, 2003, 01:15 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •