Thread: Channel Divinity Feats Proposal
Monday, 22nd September, 2008, 06:46 PM #11
The Great Druid (Lvl 17)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
ø Ignore renau1g
Good point Atanatotatos, as I said, I hadn't really looked at them, but knew they were an option. If they're unbalanced, I retract my statement.
*sigh* I hoped power creep wouldn't happen so soon.
- EN World
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense
Acolyte (Lvl 2)
I don't think they're unbalanced... It's that most core divinity feats are crap. So.... don't really know...
Come join us in the Shifting Seas and Transitive Isles of Living 4th Edition, amazing adventures and great fun guaranteed!
Then to play community 4e in Eberron join us in LEB too! Give life to your characters and contribute to the living settings!
Please excuse my poor English. It is not my first language.
Acolyte (Lvl 2)
There was some chunk of people (who I can no longer remember) who felt we should be SRD-only (or the 4e equivalent) like LEW is.
From a judges standpoint it's a fairly massive nightmarish discussion. You have
- core purists for balance
- core purist for roleplaying reasons
- core purists for time/economic reasons (don't want to have to spend a lot of time or money to be "up to date" or to keep their characters on the power curve)
- people who only want core + printed books (I think it's perceived as being more balanced)
- people who only want core + free online stuff (cost and/or lack of access to books)
- people who want everything
- people who want make up their own stuff (which LEW actually apparently allows now... so it's SRD + player generated content)
And... people aren't real flexible.
You can toss out options that are designed to split the difference (i.e. core classes get 25 attribute points, but core + online or books get 22 -> address balance issues encourage people to play "core") but nobody votes for that.
And with DDI being charged for? Not sure it'll be easier.
I think that in 3 months we'll be comfortable and happy enough playing with each other to have a chance of effectively forging consensus.
Now? It's tough. Especially since we've only got one character available to people. I'd hate to see people retiring their characters after all the effort they're spending making and approving them.
Not to mention that this can of worms often brings with it other issues (i.e. some people want to limit "weird" choices)
Defender (Lvl 8)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Ann Arbor, MI
ø Ignore covaithe
By Mal Malenkirk in forum Living 4th EditionReplies: 17Last Post: Wednesday, 21st April, 2010, 04:51 AM
By Esper the Dreamer in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 0Last Post: Saturday, 24th January, 2009, 10:56 AM
By Spatula in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 5Last Post: Monday, 15th September, 2008, 08:33 AM
By Mengu in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 26Last Post: Tuesday, 8th July, 2008, 11:58 PM
By runnerXL in forum D&D and PathfinderReplies: 0Last Post: Friday, 13th June, 2008, 01:19 PM