[Closed for now]Ata's 4e PPvPP Arena

Lord Sessadore · May 26, 2009

Oooh, Iceland. I think it'd be fun to visit Iceland. Well, hopefully his RL issues aren't anything bad, and he gets back without incident.

Atanatotatos · May 26, 2009

Well, that's good to hear. Tell him that we'll be waiting and to have a nice trip

CaBaNa · May 28, 2009

Oh No! Howling in the NIGHT!

haha

Just when the minotaur went down too... :devil:

Atanatotatos · May 28, 2009

As I was saying to Cabana via pm, I'm starting to think about possible future iterations of these PvP games. In the chance that you guys are still interested in playing these, I'd like to know what you think about two ideas I have in mind at the moment:

-One is a PvP more or less similar to the first two, but set in a single BIG labyrinth (dungeon-delving-sized, say) where all the characters make their way, basically an all-vs-all survival game.

-The other is a proper, short campaign, where one group is made of bad guys, and the other of good guys, probably set in epic levels, and heavily player-influenced. The game would be divided in two threads, and would be mostly similar to a short campaign, except that ther would be two parties of PCs in the same world, with conflicting goals. This would probably be more complex and harder to pull off.

I'd like to hear what you think about it and if you deem these feasible or interesting at all, although it's still early seeing that we're in the middle of first round at the moment.

CaBaNa · May 28, 2009

Conflicted is the right word!

Both are great ideas!

The all vs all PvP would be spectacular fun, I honestly don't know what character I would use.

The good vs evil thing would be awesome as well! Almost a capture the flag style idea. Or conquer and hold command posts. Anything could be done really.

whichever it may be, count me in!

renau1g · May 28, 2009

I enjoy it as well, it's fun to try and take on other players, as there's so many options available, you really can't pick a class that's far and away better than another.

I would lean towards the first option, mostly for ease of running it. Also, with a full party we might get some controllers involved?

industrygothica · May 28, 2009

I'm good with either. As long as I don't have two hulking behemoths attacking me at once.

Again.

-IG

Lord Sessadore · May 29, 2009

Pfft, what are you complaining about, two hulking behemoths attacking you at once? That's totally the situation I'm in, scrambling to keep Oni at bay. Again.

As a side note to that, it sounds like there's one character down in each match ... wonder how the singleton is faring in the other match ...

As for the future ideas, either one sounds cool to me. I'd definitely be interested in either one, though I agree that the campaign-style one would be hard to pull off, especially if posting rates between the two groups differs by any significant amount. Could be hard to explain why team A gets so much more done than team B

The labyrinth free-for-all really twigs my imagination though, for what it's worth.

renau1g · May 29, 2009

No the other guys not down, but we were split up for a moment. We'll see how the battle goes when it's us caught in a flanking position

industrygothica · May 29, 2009

I must say that I'm a bit curious about the second round, regardless of who makes it. I have a feeling it'll be a battle of the At-Wills... not to mention the serious lack of healing surges that will be available. This is tough!

-IG