+ Log in or register to post
Results 171 to 180 of 265
Thread: Revised GSL TODAY!
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 11:54 AM #171
Magsman (Lvl 14)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but under the new GSL, product lines can include products published under both the OGL and the GSL, correct?
Doesn't this mean that Paizo could continue to publish its adventure paths under the OGL as it has been, and then publish a separate conversion document under the GSL? It wouldn't have to jump through hoops (whether or not those hoops exist in reality) to avoid "re-definition" since all it would need to provide in the conversion document (the one using the GSL) is the necessary information on how to run it in 4th Edition. The "fluff", plot and other information where you might get tangled up in problems of terminology would all stay in the original adventure, free from the restrictions of the GSL.
Am I correct in how I understand this?
- EN World
- has no influence
- on advertisings
- that are displayed by
- Google Adsense
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 12:09 PM #172
Minor Trickster (Lvl 4)
The issue with paizo's story style is 4e's pg-13 limit. Paizo often pushes the limits, remakes monsters and redefines what something is.
Could they do..child eating monsters?, gay lovers?, incest driven cannibalistic creatures? carnivals of pain ?
The issue is having to tip -toe around someone else rules on what you can and can not say.
And it would take months extra just to get one mod out,...send it in..reject...send it in..reject...send it in reject. It's to much, they can not tell storys how they want, they have to limit it to how the gsl allows. Simple as that
Add that they are small, are streached as far as they can and 4E just is not gonna happen.
Remember kids whisky will not put out flaming mages ,but it will confuse the deathknight
"The Soul of D&D? It's rolling a natural 20 when you're down to 3 hit points and the cleric's on the floor and you're staring that sunnavabitch bugbear right in his bloodshot eye and holding the line just long enough to let the wizard unleash a fireball at the guards who are on their way, because they're all that stands between you, the Foozle and Glory." - WizarDru
Thank you Gary Gygax, for everything.
"Rock on, Paizo, for you rock mightily".- dragonlordofpoondari
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 12:23 PM #173
Scout (Lvl 6)
Piazo's goblins, ogres, harpies, elves, drow, and gnomes have been extensively redefined. Not mechanically, but description and background wise. They can't do that under the GSL. Additionally, there's the moral violence and gore cause. If that was in effect a lot of stuff that they've done they might not have. Ogres and ogre-kin, the side quest in Runelords featuring them, Lamashtu, Calistria, Zon-kuthon... heck, even Cayden Cailean might get them in trouble.
Now, they could come up with a second world or PG-13 versions of Golarion; but they're a small company who have decided they don't want to divert resources to developing a world that they can do in 4e, or to make a clean version that won't potentially make WotC either now or later revoke their liscense.
We can lick gravity, but sometimes the paperwork is overwhelming. - Werner von Braun
Right now you have no idea how lucky you are that I am not a sociopath. - A sign seen above my desk.
Never confuse movement with action. - Ernest Hemingway
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 12:28 PM #174
Acolyte (Lvl 2)
I see pathfinder as paizo's take on a 4e (i don't mean a clone or copy of wotc's 4e), it's thiers and I can definately see why they wouldn't want to divert resources at this time.
"If life gives you lemons go find someone with vodka and make a party!" --Antilles
Paraphrased from the enworld chat room.
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 12:39 PM #175
Minor Trickster (Lvl 4)
Plus as was said-the SRD doesnt allow things like Elves of G, or perhaps Classic monsters revisited....
Plus the "no excessive gor or violence...They couldnt make things like AP3 hook mountain perhaps.
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 12:51 PM #176
Cutpurse (Lvl 5)
Although I had hoped that Paizo could enter the 4E market safely, I do understand their reluctance. I don't play 4E myself, but my thought was that by marketing 4E material Paizo could widen their audience and please those who have moved on into 4E whole-heartedly. However, considering the size of the company and the amount of effort developing the 4E line would take, right before Pathfinder's rules set release date of August I can see where they are coming from. They have also mentioned that most of the folks there are unfamiliar with the new rules, and the time that it would take to become 'professional-grade proficient' would be prohibitive. Que sera sera.
I guess that Vic had it when he called it 'too little too late'. They have decided to devote all their resources to Pathfinder, and that's not such a bad thing ...
Playing pretend since 1979.
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 12:54 PM #177
Enchanter (Lvl 12)
My D&D Class:
Lawful Good Human Paladin
My Robin Law's Game Style:
100% Method Actor, 100% Storyteller, 83% Butt-Kicker, 75% Specialist, 75% Power Gamer, 67% Tactician, 0% Casual Gamer
Look what I made!
OSRIC Henchmen Generator
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 01:02 PM #178
Acolyte (Lvl 2)
Winter Arcane (aka Vanuslux)
Writer of Hardcore and Lethal
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 01:07 PM #179
Gallant (Lvl 3)
Orcus is in the Tome of Horrors. So is Jubilex (not Juiblex) and a couple of other big-name demons and devils, some renamed, some "classic". All OGC.
One project I've been working on, off and on, is a Big Book Of Slimes And Oozes, 'cause I think they're cool. I was going to use the TOH Jubilex as the centerpiece and reference him by name a lot.
Could I make a (mostly) 4e book, but include Jubilex (not Juiblex), provided I correctly included the OGL solely to reference his name, writing up my 4e version of him? Theoretically, I can include as much or as little actual text from an OGL source in an OGL product that I wish, so I could, I think, include just the name as text and the rest as "concept". I don't think you can trademark/copyright "Big slime demon" as an idea.
MrLizard.com: Lots of useful (crunchy) stuff for your RPG needs!
Wednesday, 4th March, 2009, 01:08 PM #180
Magsman (Lvl 14)
My view on this is: If you redefine a race that strongly, why bother with calling it "Elf" or "Harpie": Give it your own frigging name! Even if it's just "Golorian Elb" or something like that.
Especially in 4E, this would be a great idea to do in the first pace, since races really have characteristics and abilities that make them unique. Why not represent their take on Elves or Goblins with their own racial abilities?
Mustrum "Gummibńrchen helfen auch" Ridcully
Thoughts of the Arch Chancellor - My weblog on EN World
- containing game related material, like: house rules, design theories, reviews, play reports, adventure ideas
Secret Member of <Think we would just hide our secret with a spoiler tag, eh?>
By Emirikol in forum Miscellaneous Geek Talk & Media LoungeReplies: 45Last Post: Wednesday, 1st October, 2008, 08:35 PM
By Morrus in forum EN PublishingReplies: 7Last Post: Monday, 13th December, 2004, 05:20 PM
By Morrus in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: Sunday, 12th December, 2004, 05:45 AM
By Morrus in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: Friday, 10th December, 2004, 05:15 PM
By Holy Bovine in forum RPGs & Tabletop Gaming DiscussionReplies: 5Last Post: Tuesday, 25th June, 2002, 12:56 AM