okay.... im a little confused about the approval process. there were two obvious errors which i corrected but i was told that:
"You will need to create a character summary on the wiki page, like the ones you can find on non-spreadsheet characters. It doesn't look like the Character Creation Guide was updated to show this, but the summary makes it much easier for DMs to look over your character and make sure everything's fine. Just to clarify, you don't need to add a Math section, just a summary."
I used the character spreadsheet method, and the character spreadsheet includes a summary for the DM's quick reference, which I filled out as per the instructions on the spreadsheet and the character creation guide. If I did that... why do I have to post it again in the wiki page i created for my character? the link to the character sheet with the summary is right at the top of the wiki page. (frustrated frown)
The point is that everyone here is used to the wiki summary. The history behind this is that for a while people were allowed to just have spreadsheets. Basically, the person who built the character enjoyed the ease the spreadsheets allowed, but everyone else who had to use the character sheet (judges, DMs) really didn't like it. Personally, I prefer the spreadsheet for building characters, but I find reading the wiki page to be so much easier once the character is already built. You can read more about the decision to stop allowing just the spreadsheet
here.
Anyway, Voda Vosa's character
Vermitrax is a pretty good example of what your character page should look like.
second. i was told that:
"Powers: You should replace the "+ [Ability] modifier" wording with the final number. Also, no need to say how the power gets better when you level."
Shouldnt this be a realtively MINOR thing to withhold approval for? All of the math is right there on the spreadsheet as it is. All I did was copy/paste directly from the compendium the exact wording of the "on hit" text for the power in question.
What stonegod said, mostly. Also, that's not why I didn't approve Vayne. The lack of summary and the expertise feat were why I didn't approve her. When I review a character, I make notes of everything out of place that I notice, but I only withhold approval if one of the issues is mechanically important. Not having the right amount of ability points, or using an unapproved background. Things that change the numbers. These are the issues that need to be addressed before approval, but I still tell the player about everything else that popped up.
I fixed the mechanical errors, no problem, but im hesitating to submit my character for approval again if its going to be rejected for things like that...
would someone mind proofing me again to make sure its not an issue? (link to character page in sig)
Please don't see my comments as a rejection. See them as a critique. You submitted the first draft of your character, and I gave you notes on it. The character approval process is really more like peer review than anything else. Let me know when you've chosen a feat, and I'll take another look at Vayne.
[edit... still workign on picking a feat... so thats blank]
I recommend Unarmored Agility. Vayne's a little fragile.
edit: Dang, stonegod. You ninja-ed me twice.