+ Log in or register to post
Results 51 to 60 of 95
Tuesday, 16th March, 2010, 08:15 AM #1
Acolyte (Lvl 2)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
ø Ignore elecgraystone
Proposal: Replace Expertise Related House Rule with Feat Slot
As promised, it's the 16th so it's time to propose this. It came up as a counter-prososal to changing our houserule into a feat bonus. To see that debate the link is below.
The proposal is a simple one. Instead of the current +1 to all attacks at 5th, we give characters a free slot that they must use on an expertise type feat. Examples are Versatile Expertise and Draconic Spellcaster. Basically any feat that gives a scaling feat bonus to attacks.
The reason I think this would be the best way to deal with the new errata is that this keeps us as close to the original game as possible, as opposed to changing the universal bonus to a feat bonus that makes many feats useless. It preserves the expertise feats as is and we've already seen a feat that requires one of the feats, Weapon Master. There is also a paragon path that requires one of these feats, Ninefold Master. Who knows what will come next that has one of these feats as a requirement.
EDIT: Option B. Instead of restricting the feat slot to just expertise feats, allow any feat.
This allows players to pick flavor feats or other feats important to their character if they wish. Lets face it, a dagger weilding clever sneak (+4 dagger, +5 from 20 dex, +2 hidden = +11 at first vs ref) doesn't need an extra +1 to hit .
By Oni in forum Living 4th EditionReplies: 59Last Post: Thursday, 11th March, 2010, 04:45 AM
By JoeNotCharles in forum Living 4th EditionReplies: 3Last Post: Saturday, 15th August, 2009, 06:53 AM
By Stalker0 in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR GamingReplies: 4Last Post: Wednesday, 30th November, 2005, 11:59 AM
By HeavyG in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR GamingReplies: 11Last Post: Sunday, 10th October, 2004, 07:30 PM
By IceBear in forum Older D&D Editions and OSR GamingReplies: 24Last Post: Friday, 13th December, 2002, 09:32 PM