June Content Calender up

R

Rechan

Adventurer

• May 28, 2010

• #1

Dungeons & Dragons Roleplaying Game Official Home Page - Calendar (June 2010 Content Calendar)

Next month looks a little sparse, interest-wise. Aside from the Design and Development articles, and the Demonomicon Exceprts (and perhaps the Assassin Class Act), it's a fairly yawnworthy month.

Although I'm glad to see they are putting out sidetreks for HS1.

 

log in or register to remove this ad

AntlerDruid

Explorer

• May 28, 2010

• #2

I am excited that there is FINALLY a Psionic oriented article - Psionic Traditions!!!

another Wizards article? Geez don't they get enough already.....I would rather see Sorcerers, Ardents, Seekers, Monks, Psions & Battleminds get some love.....Wizards already have so many articles.

 

M

Mengu

First Post

• May 28, 2010

• #3

Oh finally. A dragonborn article. Was wondering if they would ever support this race.

 

Dice4Hire

First Post

• May 28, 2010

• #4

Well, I am not DDI, but the trend towards looking forwards to Dark Sun interests me a lot.

I'm looking forward to the DS discussions to be held here.

 

J

Jhaelen

First Post

• May 28, 2010

• #5

Mengu said:

Oh finally. A dragonborn article. Was wondering if they would ever support this race.

Click to expand...

You mean, apart from [ame=http://www.amazon.com/Players-Handbook-Races-Dragonborn-Supplement/dp/0786953861]this[/ame]?

 

P

Peraion Graufalke

First Post

• May 28, 2010

• #6

Looks good to me, there's something for players of every 4e setting (Hooray for Dark Sun stuff!), and assassins finally get some love.

Jhaelen said:

You mean, apart from this?

Click to expand...

Sarcasm, methinks.

 

Bold or Stupid

First Post

• May 28, 2010

• #7

Oooh. Wonder what the dragonmark article contains.

 

vagabundo

Adventurer

• May 28, 2010

• #8

Bold or Stupid said:

Oooh. Wonder what the dragonmark article contains.

Click to expand...

New Dragonmarks.

 

Dice4Hire

First Post

• May 28, 2010

• #9

vagabundo said:

New Dragonmarks.

Click to expand...

This thread has its full share of obvious answers already, methinks.

 

RangerWickett

Legend

• May 28, 2010

• #10

"Mr. Webster, in your dictionary, under redundant it says, 'See redundant.' That entry will confuse the readers."

"Heh, you can say that again."



I'm still sad that they put the art galleries behind a pay wall. It's hard to send links to my friends.