Monster Manual 3 New Math?
+ Log in or register to post
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    Member
    Cutpurse (Lvl 5)

    Sylrae's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    London, On
    Posts
    905
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Sylrae


    Friend+
    My communities:

    Monster Manual 3 New Math?

    I've been hearing lots of people telling me that the MM3 is better overall and uses different math than the MM1.

    Can someone show me the differences, and possibly point me to a table of the expected numbers for different roles at different levels?

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Spellbinder (Lvl 16)

    keterys's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lynn, MA
    Posts
    7,854
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block keterys


    Friend+
    Good discussion can be found here.

  4. #4
    Member
    Superhero (Lvl 15)



    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,991
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block Aegeri


    Friend+
    Quote Originally Posted by Sylrae View Post
    I've been hearing lots of people telling me that the MM3 is better overall and uses different math than the MM1.

    Can someone show me the differences, and possibly point me to a table of the expected numbers for different roles at different levels?
    On average, monsters do around level + 8 damage now, with brutes doing a little more and limited attacks doing a little more again. This damage increase really comes into play at paragon and epic tier, so you can leave heroic monsters alone.

    There are two options for older monsters:

    A) Use the new damage chart and change expressions as you like.

    B) Double the static damage normal creatures do and triple the static damage that a brute does.

    EG: A level 12 creature that does 2d6+3 damage, now does 2d6+6 damage.

    A level 12 brute that does 2d6+3 damage, now does 2d6+9 damage.

    The double/triple method is the easiest one in practice and actually comes off pretty well for monster creatures. For a more swingy effect, you can also add 1 or 2 dice onto the attack. The above example would be 3d6+3 and 4d6+3 for a brute.

  5. #5
    Member
    Myrmidon (Lvl 10)



    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    knockin' on heaven's door
    Posts
    2,263
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block ggroy


    Friend+
    My communities:

    For the old monster damage, the average damage from the "normal damage expression" table on page 185 of the 4E DMG1, follows approximately:

    low damage: 6 + level*5/12
    medium damage: 8 + level*7/15
    high damage: 10 + level*3/5.


    For the new monster damage table from the 4E DMG1 errata for page 185, the average damage follow approximately:

    single target: 8 + level
    two or more targets: 6 + level*3/4.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Spellbinder (Lvl 16)

    keterys's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lynn, MA
    Posts
    7,854
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block keterys


    Friend+
    +25% for Brute or Limited
    +50% for Brute Limited

    (Note that many Lurkers fall into Limited, and may merit the full 50% for extreme lurking mechanics)

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Monster builder still uses old math... a little bit annoying... and time consuming.

  9. #9
    Member
    Defender (Lvl 8)

    caudor's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas, United States
    Posts
    1,737
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block caudor


    Friend+
    My communities:

    Hum...I'm trying to grasp the impact/scope of this errata. Does this change the damage of all monsters & traps in Monster Manual 1 & 2, plus all adventures and other books before July 2010?

    Is the online compendium updated to reflect changes to damage of older monsters?

    Thanks.

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Spellbinder (Lvl 16)

    keterys's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lynn, MA
    Posts
    7,854
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews

    Block keterys


    Friend+
    No and no, though many of the older monsters _should_ have their damage changed.

    Expect to see some higher damage options in newer books, though. Monster Vault will soon be out, and I highly suspect it'll have some much better versions of a number of monsters.

+ Log in or register to post
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Similar Threads

  1. Unhappy w/4E monster manual..3PP pls. publish monster books pronto!!
    By Blair Goatsblood in forum Roleplaying Games General Discussion
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: Thursday, 10th February, 2011, 08:58 AM
  2. Monster Manual monster attack keywords, resistances, immunities, and vulnerabilities.
    By FatAndy in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Monday, 18th May, 2009, 12:30 PM
  3. i created this monster off of the older monster manual
    By fearghal in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Tuesday, 19th August, 2008, 09:13 AM
  4. So which Desert of Desolation Monster isn't in the Monster Manual I?
    By Glyfair in forum Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, and OSR Gaming
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: Monday, 29th October, 2007, 09:36 PM
  5. partial monster list for Monster Manual III
    By Kravell in forum Roleplaying Games General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Tuesday, 15th June, 2004, 12:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •