House Rules - Your Opinion?
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Golden State
    Posts
    944

    House Rules - Your Opinion?

    I'm thinking of trying out a couple of houserules for my TB arc. They are:

    1) Spell casters regain spell slots as per the 10 minute day as per TB. However, all spells cast are at minimum caster level for all level-based effects. Thus, a 10th level wizard casting a 3rd level fireball would inflict only 5d6 of damage instead of 10d6. (5th level, or +5 in TB, is the minimum level necessary for wizards to cast 3rd level spells). To get the full level effect of the spell, the caster must expend an additional spell slot.

    2) For solo monsters, instead of having a "pool" of hitpoints equal to the monster's hp times the number of PCs, the monster has a number of attacks equal to the number of PCs.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Clemson
    Posts
    2,234
    #1 is double cost for mages. Fireball is Restricted alread (AP to recover all of them in a short rest), and they have to burn two slots to get their full level.
    Long live the charging, full power attacking barbarians, because they're obviously your only beloved class.
    (Seriously, major caster nerf, and in a way that doesn't really fix anything.)

    #2 Seems like it's meant to beat PCs to death unless they "win initiative". Give it the HP it needs to survive long enough to be interesting and memorable. Then use AP liberally to take a standard action in between PC turns, so that it's "turn" is the entire freaking round. That's Solo.
    Don't give the dragon four attacks (what do you mean dragons already have six attacks!?).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Golden State
    Posts
    944
    Quote Originally Posted by ValhallaGH View Post
    #1 is double cost for mages. Fireball is Restricted alread (AP to recover all of them in a short rest), and they have to burn two slots to get their full level.
    Long live the charging, full power attacking barbarians, because they're obviously your only beloved class.
    (Seriously, major caster nerf, and in a way that doesn't really fix anything.)

    #2 Seems like it's meant to beat PCs to death unless they "win initiative". Give it the HP it needs to survive long enough to be interesting and memorable. Then use AP liberally to take a standard action in between PC turns, so that it's "turn" is the entire freaking round. That's Solo.
    Don't give the dragon four attacks (what do you mean dragons already have six attacks!?).
    Thanks for the response, ValhallaGH. Regarding #1: Spell slot recovery will be same as other special abilities, not as per TB. Thus, MUs get all their spell slots back after a 10 minute rest.

    As for #2: I'll let you know how it goes. And thanks for the reminder about the AP. Hmmm. Party of six equals six attacks (or 36 for dragons ) AND an extra action via an AP. That...is gonna hurt.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    U.S. New England
    Posts
    8,336
    What Valhalla said.

    (VGH groks TB better than any customer I've seen yet.)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Clemson
    Posts
    2,234
    Quote Originally Posted by joela View Post
    Regarding #1: Spell slot recovery will be same as other special abilities, not as per TB. Thus, MUs get all their spell slots back after a 10 minute rest.
    ... Then just cut available spell slots in half (round up). Same effect, and it's so very simpler to implement and explain.

    (Oh, and it throws the spell re-balance of Trailblazer right out a window to land on it's face in a pile of dog droppings. TB assumes that certain spells are powerful enough that they shouldn't be always available, but cool and useful enough that they shouldn't be banned outright. That's where the current system came from.
    Your system assumes that all spells are fine, it's just the automatic Caster Level increase that's a problem, and that it is only a problem when a caster has as many spells as they get. If they had half that number then it wouldn't be an issue. Or they could have the same number of spells but they don't get any benefit from caster levels beyond the minimum. Which is a false assumption.)

    Quote Originally Posted by joela View Post
    As for #2: I'll let you know how it goes. And thanks for the reminder about the AP. Hmmm. Party of six equals six attacks (or 36 for dragons ) AND an extra action via an AP. That...is gonna hurt.
    Scariest. Hydras. Since mythology.
    7+ attacks against every member of the party. Or 7+ against everyone except the Wizards, and a breath weapon for everyone. (Assuming a 7-head cryo-/pyro-hydra; but anything less isn't really challenging enough to use at any level.)
    Plus their standard "all-in" attacks of opportunity.

    Still squishy enough to kill in the surprise round (poor hydras, not being tough) but if they live past that, and get into melee, then a PC (or two) is going to die.


    @Wulf Ratbane - Blame Iron Heroes. I loved that system, and grok it fully. (It's terribly flawed and wildly complicated or I'd still be playing it.) Trailblazer is a spiritual successor, if not a mechanical one. That's a good thing.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Golden State
    Posts
    944
    Quote Originally Posted by ValhallaGH View Post
    ... Then just cut available spell slots in half (round up). Same effect, and it's so very simpler to implement and explain.

    (Oh, and it throws the spell re-balance of Trailblazer right out a window to land on it's face in a pile of dog droppings. TB assumes that certain spells are powerful enough that they shouldn't be always available, but cool and useful enough that they shouldn't be banned outright. That's where the current system came from.
    Your system assumes that all spells are fine, it's just the automatic Caster Level increase that's a problem, and that it is only a problem when a caster has as many spells as they get. If they had half that number then it wouldn't be an issue. Or they could have the same number of spells but they don't get any benefit from caster levels beyond the minimum. Which is a false assumption.)



    Scariest. Hydras. Since mythology.
    7+ attacks against every member of the party. Or 7+ against everyone except the Wizards, and a breath weapon for everyone. (Assuming a 7-head cryo-/pyro-hydra; but anything less isn't really challenging enough to use at any level.)
    Plus their standard "all-in" attacks of opportunity.

    Still squishy enough to kill in the surprise round (poor hydras, not being tough) but if they live past that, and get into melee, then a PC (or two) is going to die.
    Awesome analysis. Thanks!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Clemson
    Posts
    2,234
    You are most welcome.

    Best of luck.

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Similar Threads

  1. good site for posting house rules [re. house rules subforum]
    By garrowolf in forum Meta - Forums About Forums
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Saturday, 29th June, 2013, 11:55 AM
  2. My House Rules - What is your opinion?
    By HealingAura in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Sunday, 7th June, 2009, 04:28 AM
  3. Why are house rules bad? Why are people proud of having few house rules?
    By Chainsaw Mage in forum *General Roleplaying Games Discussion
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: Sunday, 8th October, 2006, 08:39 PM
  4. House rules that relate to the "How house rules are changing my Scout." thread.
    By ProtoClone in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Wednesday, 31st August, 2005, 05:42 PM
  5. Opinion of Minimum Hit Point Increase House Rule?
    By AdamBank in forum *Pathfinder, Starfinder, Older D&D Editions (4E, 3.x, 2E, 1E, OD&D), D&D Variants, OSR
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: Sunday, 9th February, 2003, 05:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •