+ Log in or register to post
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Monday, 17th January, 2011, 12:14 PM #1
Proposal: Magic Item trade caluse
Proposal: A player may trade with a merchant or another player. If trading with a player, the level and cost of the items must be equal. If trading with a merchant, the level and cost must be equal or lower.
Why? This proposal is aimed to fix some of the problems raised Proposal: Let Players Sell Stuff to Other Players, while still maintaining the integrity of the D&D wealth curve.
Allowing players to trade their magic items for items of an equivalent value addresses the issue of DMs giving unwanted loot, whether it be items that the player dislikes, or if an item type (sword, shield, armor, etc) is replaced before other item groups are filled out.
Also, it just makes sense. For example, let's say I go adventuring and find a L4 Shielding blade. Then I go back to town to see the merchant and he's selling a L4 Sunblade which I like better. It's nonsensical that the vendor would offer me only 168gp for the Shielding blade, but pay the full 840 for the Sunblade.
This would essentially allow players to sell at 100%, if and only if, they spend that gold on an item of equal or lesser value. Therefore, the wealth of the player has not changed (in fact, it may have gotten lower), but the player is happier.
The Result:The player wealth will remain essentially the same, players will be able to generally have the items they want, and DMs will not need to be as concerned with picking the "right" item for the player.
Tuesday, 18th January, 2011, 03:19 AM #2
Well, the underlying economics of D&D has never made sense. Truthfully it makes no sense for any merchant to carry any magic items....outside of maybe +1 items, as having thousands of gold pieces tied up in inventory on the hopes that someone comes buy to pick it up? Not likely.
Currently the system forces people to decide whether they want to upgrade their main 3 items (weapon/implement, armor, neck) or grab some misc. items. Not sure I like the swapping at will. At best I'd allow this "re-train" instead of your regular retrain of a feat/power/etc.
Tuesday, 18th January, 2011, 06:28 PM #3
Defender (Lvl 8)
Tuesday, 18th January, 2011, 07:39 PM #4
Wednesday, 19th January, 2011, 03:05 PM #5
Defender (Lvl 8)
I struggle with that, too, as a DM. As a judge, I'd have no problem at all if you want to award your players the L4 item of their choice. Suitably fluffed up (e.g. their patron commissions the finest magical craftsmen to do a personalized order) that sort of thing can be a great RP experience and a fun way to end an adventure. But it's not appropriate for all adventures, and as a DM, I'd want to have the option to give specific items.
Also, IMO allowing players to trade one-for-one with merchants freely makes it too easy to customize their equipment for specific adventures. "What's that you say? You've got a problem with undead? Pardon me while I go turn in my necrotic weapon for a radiant weapon..."
Wednesday, 19th January, 2011, 06:03 PM #6
Scout (Lvl 6)
I play WotC's Living Forgotten Realms campaign. With the introduction of item rarity into D&D, they added a generic treasure option to all of their adventures.
Pick an uncommon item of your level or less, or a common item of your level+2 or less.
Rare items are only given out as specific rewards.
You are allowed to purchase common items, but not uncommon items or rare items.
You can sell common items for 20% of their price, uncommon items for 50%. You cannot sell rare items at all.
You are limited to owning a number of uncommon items equal to your level and one rare item per tier.
Perhaps something similar can be formulated that would work with L4W. Personally, I think the LFR rules have a big hole when it comes to consumables.
By Vertexx69 in forum Living EberronReplies: 36Last Post: Thursday, 10th June, 2010, 03:12 AM
By TwoHeadsBarking in forum Living 4th EditionReplies: 59Last Post: Wednesday, 2nd December, 2009, 02:10 PM
By JoeNotCharles in forum Living 4th EditionReplies: 10Last Post: Wednesday, 23rd September, 2009, 05:23 PM
By Halford in forum Living EN WorldReplies: 8Last Post: Saturday, 29th November, 2008, 10:14 AM
By Olaf the Stout in forum General Tabletop Gaming DiscussionReplies: 30Last Post: Saturday, 26th May, 2007, 03:13 AM